Department of Mathematics, Xavier University, Cincinnati, Ohio.
National Advance Driving Simulator, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(sup1):S1-S7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2072492. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
This research explores the driving performance of people who use cannabis daily or occasionally during distraction tasks performed following acute cannabis use. Healthy adults aged 25 to 45 years with different cannabis usage histories were recruited to participate in a within-subjects controlled experiment using a car-based driving simulator. Participants were classified as having daily use (n = 31), occasional use (1 or 2 times per week; n = 24), or no-use (n = 30). Participants completed a practice drive followed by four 5-10 minute driving scenarios during the baseline period. Participants then smoked self-procured cannabis flower ad libitum for up to 15 minutes. Thirty minutes later, they completed four additional 5-10 minute scenarios. Scenarios were paired according to difficulty and randomized across the baseline and post-use periods. Each scenario contained between 0 and 3 repetitions of a distraction task where the participant was prompted by an audio message to select an app from a 4 × 5 grid displayed on a mounted tablet, a step that would require briefly looking away from the roadway. Measures of driving performance (lane departures, standard deviation of lateral position) were assessed during the five-second period following the audio trigger and analyzed using generalized linear mixed models. Those with a pattern of occasional use were significantly more likely to experience a lane departure during distraction periods after acute cannabis use relative to baseline (OR = 3.71, = 0.04, CI = 1.04, 13.17), while those with daily use did not exhibit a similar increase (OR = 1.56, = 0.43, CI = 0.52, 4.64). Changes in departure risk were significantly greater for the occasional use group compared to no-use ( = 0.02), but not for the daily use group compared to no-use ( = 0.18). However, following acute use, those who use daily exhibited decreases in speed relative to baseline in comparison to the changes observed in the no-use group ( = 0.02), while differences between occasional and no-use did not reach statistical significance ( = 0.052). Differences in standard deviation of lateral position were not statistically significant, likely due to the short duration of tasks. These results find the largest potential safety concerns associated with a pattern of occasional use, who displayed an increase in lane departures after acute cannabis smoking. Those in the daily use group decreased their speed, which may be interpreted as compensation for drug effects. Further research is needed to understand the effects during longer and more complex secondary tasks.
本研究探讨了在急性大麻使用后进行分心任务时,每日或偶尔使用大麻的人的驾驶表现。招募了年龄在 25 至 45 岁之间、有不同大麻使用史的健康成年人,参加基于汽车的驾驶模拟器的单组对照实验。参与者被分为每日使用组(n=31)、偶尔使用组(每周 1 或 2 次;n=24)和无使用组(n=30)。参与者在基线期完成一次练习驾驶,然后在四个 5-10 分钟的驾驶场景中完成驾驶。参与者随后自行吸食大麻花,最多 15 分钟。30 分钟后,他们完成了另外四个 5-10 分钟的场景。根据难度对场景进行配对,并在基线期和使用后期随机配对。每个场景都包含 0 到 3 次分散注意力的任务,参与者会收到一个音频提示,要求他们从显示在安装的平板电脑上的 4×5 网格中选择一个应用程序,这一步骤需要短暂地将视线从道路上移开。在音频触发后的五秒钟内,评估驾驶性能(车道偏离、横向位置标准差),并使用广义线性混合模型进行分析。那些偶尔使用大麻的人在急性大麻使用后,在分心期间发生车道偏离的可能性明显高于基线(OR=3.71,=0.04,CI=1.04,13.17),而每日使用大麻的人则没有类似的增加(OR=1.56,=0.43,CI=0.52,4.64)。偶尔使用组的偏离风险变化明显大于无使用组(=0.02),而每日使用组与无使用组相比(=0.18)则没有明显变化。然而,与无使用组相比,每日使用组在急性使用后,速度相对于基线下降(=0.02),而偶尔使用组与无使用组之间的差异没有达到统计学意义(=0.052)。横向位置标准差的差异没有统计学意义,可能是由于任务持续时间短。这些结果发现与偶尔使用模式相关的最大潜在安全问题,即急性吸食大麻后车道偏离的增加。每日使用组的速度下降,这可能被解释为药物作用的补偿。需要进一步研究以了解在更长和更复杂的次要任务期间的影响。