• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运动反应活力和视觉固视模式反映了跨期选择中的主观估值。

Motor response vigour and visual fixation patterns reflect subjective valuation during intertemporal choice.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jun 10;18(6):e1010096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010096. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010096
PMID:35687550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9187114/
Abstract

Value-based decision-making is of central interest in cognitive neuroscience and psychology, as well as in the context of neuropsychiatric disorders characterised by decision-making impairments. Studies examining (neuro-)computational mechanisms underlying choice behaviour typically focus on participants' decisions. However, there is increasing evidence that option valuation might also be reflected in motor response vigour and eye movements, implicit measures of subjective utility. To examine motor response vigour and visual fixation correlates of option valuation in intertemporal choice, we set up a task where the participants selected an option by pressing a grip force transducer, simultaneously tracking fixation shifts between options. As outlined in our preregistration (https://osf.io/k6jct), we used hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation to model the choices assuming hyperbolic discounting, compared variants of the softmax and drift diffusion model, and assessed the relationship between response vigour and the estimated model parameters. The behavioural data were best explained by a drift diffusion model specifying a non-linear scaling of the drift rate by the subjective value differences. Replicating previous findings, we found a magnitude effect for temporal discounting, such that higher rewards were discounted less. This magnitude effect was further reflected in motor response vigour, such that stronger forces were exerted in the high vs. the low magnitude condition. Bayesian hierarchical linear regression further revealed higher grip forces, faster response times and a lower number of fixation shifts for trials with higher subjective value differences. An exploratory analysis revealed that subjective value sums across options showed an even more pronounced association with trial-wise grip force amplitudes. Our data suggest that subjective utility or implicit valuation is reflected in motor response vigour and visual fixation patterns during intertemporal choice. Taking into account response vigour might thus provide deeper insight into decision-making, reward valuation and maladaptive changes in these processes, e.g. in the context of neuropsychiatric disorders.

摘要

基于价值的决策是认知神经科学和心理学的核心关注点,也是神经精神疾病中决策障碍的研究重点。研究考察决策行为的(神经)计算机制通常侧重于参与者的决策。然而,越来越多的证据表明,选项估值也可能反映在运动反应活力和眼动中,这是主观效用的内隐测量。为了研究跨期选择中选项估值与运动反应活力和视觉注视的关系,我们设计了一项任务,参与者通过按压握力传感器来选择一个选项,同时跟踪选项之间的注视转移。正如我们的预注册(https://osf.io/k6jct)中所述,我们使用分层贝叶斯参数估计来对假设双曲线折扣的选择进行建模,比较了软最大化和漂移扩散模型的变体,并评估了反应活力与估计模型参数之间的关系。行为数据通过指定漂移率与主观价值差异呈非线性关系的漂移扩散模型得到了最好的解释。复制先前的发现,我们发现了时间折扣的幅度效应,即较高的奖励折扣较小。这种幅度效应进一步反映在运动反应活力中,即高幅度条件下的力更强。贝叶斯分层线性回归进一步揭示了更高的握力、更快的反应时间和更低的注视转移次数,用于具有更高主观价值差异的试验。探索性分析表明,选项之间的主观价值总和与试验级握力振幅的关联更为明显。我们的数据表明,主观效用或隐式估值反映在跨期选择中的运动反应活力和视觉注视模式中。考虑反应活力可能会深入了解决策、奖励估值以及这些过程中的适应不良变化,例如在神经精神疾病的背景下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/f7c099a0c52b/pcbi.1010096.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/f0977d783dfc/pcbi.1010096.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/fda39eed2791/pcbi.1010096.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/d66586f1bb40/pcbi.1010096.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/14da3c80b960/pcbi.1010096.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/c0c3c2b610c5/pcbi.1010096.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/9ffbe77b60c6/pcbi.1010096.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/00033a3a27f0/pcbi.1010096.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/f7c099a0c52b/pcbi.1010096.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/f0977d783dfc/pcbi.1010096.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/fda39eed2791/pcbi.1010096.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/d66586f1bb40/pcbi.1010096.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/14da3c80b960/pcbi.1010096.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/c0c3c2b610c5/pcbi.1010096.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/9ffbe77b60c6/pcbi.1010096.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/00033a3a27f0/pcbi.1010096.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd2/9187114/f7c099a0c52b/pcbi.1010096.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Motor response vigour and visual fixation patterns reflect subjective valuation during intertemporal choice.运动反应活力和视觉固视模式反映了跨期选择中的主观估值。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jun 10;18(6):e1010096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010096. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
The Attraction Effect Modulates Reward Prediction Errors and Intertemporal Choices.吸引力效应调节奖励预测误差和跨期选择。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 11;37(2):371-382. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2532-16.2016.
3
Dopaminergic Modulation of Human Intertemporal Choice: A Diffusion Model Analysis Using the D2-Receptor Antagonist Haloperidol.多巴胺能调节人类跨期选择:使用 D2 受体拮抗剂氟哌啶醇的扩散模型分析。
J Neurosci. 2020 Oct 7;40(41):7936-7948. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0592-20.2020. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
4
The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in inter-temporal and risky choice: A case study in medial orbitofrontal cortex lesion patients and controls.时际与风险选择中的漂移扩散模型作为选择规则:内侧眶额皮层损伤患者与对照的病例研究。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Apr 20;16(4):e1007615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007615. eCollection 2020 Apr.
5
Intertemporal choice as discounted value accumulation.作为贴现价值积累的跨期选择。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e90138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090138. eCollection 2014.
6
Cueing the personal future to reduce discounting in intertemporal choice: Is episodic prospection necessary?提示个人未来以减少跨期选择中的折扣:情景式前瞻是否必要?
Hippocampus. 2015 Apr;25(4):432-43. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22431. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
7
The neural dissociation of subjective valuation from choice processes in intertemporal choice.跨期选择中主观估值与选择过程的神经分离。
Behav Brain Res. 2012 May 16;231(1):40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.02.045. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
8
The neural correlates of intertemporal decision-making: contributions of subjective value, stimulus type, and trait impulsivity.时间决策的神经关联:主观价值、刺激类型和特质冲动性的贡献。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Oct;32(10):1637-48. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21136. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
9
Temporal Dynamics of the Interaction between Reward and Time Delay during Intertemporal Choice.跨期选择中奖励与时间延迟之间交互作用的时间动态
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 12;7:1526. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01526. eCollection 2016.
10
Pre-supplementary motor area strengthens reward sensitivity in intertemporal choice.前额辅助运动区增强了跨期选择中的奖励敏感性。
Neuroimage. 2024 Oct 1;299:120838. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120838. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambiguity preferences in intertemporal and risky choice: A large-scale study using drift-diffusion modelling.跨期与风险选择中的模糊性偏好:一项使用漂移扩散模型的大规模研究。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02709-2.
2
Physical effort precrastination determines preference in an isometric task.体力前置决定等距任务中的偏好。
J Neurophysiol. 2024 Nov 1;132(5):1395-1411. doi: 10.1152/jn.00040.2024. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
Dopamine regulates decision thresholds in human reinforcement learning in males.多巴胺调节男性在人类强化学习中的决策阈值。

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability assessment of temporal discounting measures in virtual reality environments.虚拟现实环境中时间折扣测量的可靠性评估。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 29;11(1):7015. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86388-8.
2
Using pharmacological manipulations to study the role of dopamine in human reward functioning: A review of studies in healthy adults.使用药理学手段研究多巴胺在人类奖赏功能中的作用:对健康成年人研究的综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Jan;120:123-158. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
3
Pharmacological evidence for the implication of noradrenaline in effort.
Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 4;14(1):5369. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41130-y.
药理学证据表明去甲肾上腺素在努力中的作用。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Oct 12;18(10):e3000793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000793. eCollection 2020 Oct.
4
Dopaminergic Modulation of Human Intertemporal Choice: A Diffusion Model Analysis Using the D2-Receptor Antagonist Haloperidol.多巴胺能调节人类跨期选择:使用 D2 受体拮抗剂氟哌啶醇的扩散模型分析。
J Neurosci. 2020 Oct 7;40(41):7936-7948. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0592-20.2020. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
5
Dopaminergic modulation of the exploration/exploitation trade-off in human decision-making.多巴胺对人类决策中探索/利用权衡的调节作用。
Elife. 2020 Jun 2;9:e51260. doi: 10.7554/eLife.51260.
6
The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in inter-temporal and risky choice: A case study in medial orbitofrontal cortex lesion patients and controls.时际与风险选择中的漂移扩散模型作为选择规则:内侧眶额皮层损伤患者与对照的病例研究。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Apr 20;16(4):e1007615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007615. eCollection 2020 Apr.
7
The role of dopamine in dynamic effort-reward integration.多巴胺在动态努力-奖赏整合中的作用。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020 Aug;45(9):1448-1453. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-0669-0. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
8
Dopamine promotes cognitive effort by biasing the benefits versus costs of cognitive work.多巴胺通过使认知工作的收益与成本产生偏差来促进认知努力。
Science. 2020 Mar 20;367(6484):1362-1366. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz5891.
9
An Adaptation of Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer (PIT) Methodology to Examine the Energizing Effects of Reward-Predicting Cues on Behavior in Young Adults.一种将巴甫洛夫式到工具性转换(PIT)方法进行改编,以检验奖励预测线索对年轻人行为的激励作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 14;11:195. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00195. eCollection 2020.
10
Cross-Situational Statistical Learning of New Words Despite Bilateral Hippocampal Damage and Severe Amnesia.尽管双侧海马体受损并患有严重失忆症,仍能进行新词的跨情境统计学习。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jan 14;13:448. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00448. eCollection 2019.