College of Economics and Management, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, China.
College of Economics and Management, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 10;17(6):e0266169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266169. eCollection 2022.
Due to promote manufacturing enterprises to carry out green technology innovation practice smoothly, achieve the goal of energy conservation and emission reduction, and win green competitive advantage, this paper first divides the green technology innovation path into two types, namely internal independent R&D of green technology (IIGT) and external green technology introduction (EGTI), and analyzes the operation mechanism of these two types of paths. Secondly, a two-agent game model of different types of environmental regulation tools on the choice of green technology innovation path of manufacturing enterprises is constructed. To be sure, the manufacturing enterprises include the leader enterprise A and the follower enterprise B. It is assumed that the two groups of manufacturing enterprises produce the same products or provide the same services in the natural state without considering other influencing factors. Finally, stability analysis and numerical simulation are employed to compare and analyze the heterogeneous effects of different environmental regulation tools on the path selection of green technology innovation in manufacturing enterprises.The simulation shows that when the government adopts or does not adopt environmental regulation means, the system, leader enterprise A and follower enterprise B will eventually choose the path of IIGT or EGTI respectively after a long-term evolution process. However, the effects of subsidy for green technology innovation and carbon tax rate on the path selection of green technology innovation are different among the three parties. Specifically, when the government adopts the means of subsidy for green technology innovation, the leader enterprise A will actively choose the the path of IIGT earlier than the follower enterprise B. On the contrary, when the government adopts the means of carbon tax, the leader enterprise A will actively choose the the path of IIGT later than the follower enterprise B. The research of this paper is helpful to explore the green and sustainable development mode of China's manufacturing industry under the dual constraints of environment and resources, and provides decision support for the relevant national departments to make relevant policies.
为了顺利推动制造企业开展绿色技术创新实践,实现节能减排目标,赢得绿色竞争优势,本文首先将绿色技术创新路径分为内部独立绿色技术研发(IIGT)和外部绿色技术引进(EGTI)两种类型,并分析了这两种路径的运行机制。其次,构建了不同类型环境规制工具对制造企业绿色技术创新路径选择的两阶段博弈模型。确定制造企业包括领导者企业 A 和追随者企业 B。假设两组制造企业在自然状态下生产相同的产品或提供相同的服务,不考虑其他影响因素。最后,运用稳定性分析和数值模拟,比较和分析了不同环境规制工具对制造企业绿色技术创新路径选择的异质效应。模拟结果表明,当政府采取或不采取环境规制手段时,系统、领导者企业 A 和追随者企业 B 经过长期的演化过程后,最终会分别选择 IIGT 或 EGTI 路径。然而,绿色技术创新补贴和碳税率对绿色技术创新路径选择的影响在三方之间存在差异。具体来说,当政府采用绿色技术创新补贴手段时,领导者企业 A 会比追随者企业 B 更早地积极选择 IIGT 路径。相反,当政府采用碳税手段时,领导者企业 A 会比追随者企业 B 更晚地积极选择 IIGT 路径。本文的研究有助于探索中国制造业在环境和资源双重约束下的绿色可持续发展模式,为相关国家部门制定相关政策提供决策支持。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-9-3
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-10-21
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-12-8
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024-6
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023-8
Front Psychol. 2021-1-18
Soc Work Public Health. 2020-4-1
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019-11-26
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019-3-21