• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康专业人员和家长对婴儿主导的断奶的知识和态度:一项横断面研究。

Knowledge and attitudes towards baby-led-weaning by health professionals and parents: A cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Research Centers in Nutrition and Health (CINUSA Group), Paseo de la Habana, 43, 28036 Madrid, Spain; Escuela Baby Lead Weaning, https://www.escuelablw.es/, Spain.

Research Centers in Nutrition and Health (CINUSA Group), Paseo de la Habana, 43, 28036 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2022 Jun;32 Suppl 1:S64-S72. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcle.2021.04.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.enfcle.2021.04.005
PMID:35688568
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Baby-led-weaning (BLW) is a novel model of complementary feeding. Although there is little scientific evidence to support the suitability or superiority of this complementary feeding model, BLW is followed by many families today. The aim was to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of a group of parents and health professionals regarding BLW in Spain.

METHODS

This research was designed as a cross-sectional study in a sample of 502 parents and 364 health professionals. Two questionnaires generated and disseminated through Google forms were used. The differences between groups of professionals were analyzed using the Chi-Square test.

RESULTS

92.3% of professionals and 93.4% of parents knew about BLW. They recommend BLW "always" in 39.8% and 69.3% of the cases, and "sometimes" in 49.7% and 24.9%, respectively. Of the health professionals, 80.5% recommended starting complementary feeding as of six months, 36% of them using BLW, 24% followed traditional weaning, 3.3% bottle feeding and the remaining 36% did not indicate. Eighty-three percent recommended chewing as soon as the child showed interest.

CONCLUSION

Both health professionals and parents recommend BLW and consider it helps promote the developmental milestones of the baby. Providing nurses with an adequate number of resources to guide parents on complementary feeding will continue to improve childcare.

摘要

目的

婴儿主导的离乳(BLW)是一种新的补充喂养模式。尽管几乎没有科学证据支持这种补充喂养模式的适用性或优越性,但现在仍有许多家庭遵循 BLW。本研究旨在评估西班牙一组父母和卫生专业人员对 BLW 的知识和态度。

方法

本研究设计为通过谷歌表格分发的 502 名父母和 364 名卫生专业人员的横断面研究。使用两个自行生成的问卷进行研究。使用卡方检验分析专业人员之间的差异。

结果

92.3%的专业人员和 93.4%的父母了解 BLW。他们在 39.8%和 69.3%的情况下始终建议 BLW,在 49.7%和 24.9%的情况下有时建议 BLW。在卫生专业人员中,80.5%建议从 6 个月开始补充喂养,其中 36%使用 BLW,24%遵循传统离乳,3.3%采用奶瓶喂养,其余 36%未指定。83%的人建议一旦孩子表现出兴趣就开始咀嚼。

结论

卫生专业人员和父母都推荐 BLW,并认为它有助于促进婴儿的发育里程碑。为护士提供足够数量的资源来指导父母进行补充喂养,将继续改善儿童保健。

相似文献

1
Knowledge and attitudes towards baby-led-weaning by health professionals and parents: A cross-sectional study.健康专业人员和家长对婴儿主导的断奶的知识和态度:一项横断面研究。
Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2022 Jun;32 Suppl 1:S64-S72. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcle.2021.04.005.
2
Knowledge and attitudes towards baby-led-weaning by health professionals and parents: A cross-sectional study.健康专业人员和家长对自主进食的认知与态度:一项横断面研究。
Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2021 Jun 19. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2021.04.005.
3
Baby-led weaning: Health professionals 'knowledge and attitudes and parents' experiences from Spain. A mixed methods approach.婴儿主导的离乳:来自西班牙的健康专业人员的知识、态度和父母的经验。混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jul;30(4):e1352-e1363. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13543. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
4
Brazilian health professionals' perception about the Baby-Led Weaning (BLW) method for complementary feeding: an exploratory study.巴西卫生专业人员对婴儿主导的断乳法(BLW)用于补充喂养的看法:一项探索性研究。
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2021 Oct 4;40:e2020321. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2020321. eCollection 2021.
5
Experiences and opinions towards baby-led weaning by healthcare professionals. A qualitative study.医护人员对婴儿主导的离乳法的经验和看法。一项定性研究。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Nov;94(5):1784-1788. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02694-z. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
6
[What is currently known about the baby-led weaning method-BLW?].[目前关于婴儿主导式断乳法(BLW)有哪些已知信息?]
Andes Pediatr. 2022 Jun;93(3):300-311. doi: 10.32641/andespediatr.v93i3.4181.
7
Comparison of food and nutrient intake in infants aged 6-12 months, following baby-led or traditional weaning: A cross-sectional study.6-12 月龄婴儿采用自主进食或传统方法添加辅食后食物及营养素摄入的比较:一项横断面研究。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022 Apr;35(2):310-324. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12947. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
8
How different are baby-led weaning and conventional complementary feeding? A cross-sectional study of infants aged 6-8 months.婴儿主导式辅食添加与传统辅食添加有何不同?一项针对6至8个月婴儿的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 May 6;6(5):e010665. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010665.
9
Baby-led weaning: A thematic analysis of comments made by parents using online parenting forums.婴儿自主进食:对使用在线育儿论坛的父母发表的评论进行的主题分析。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2023 Jun;36(3):772-786. doi: 10.1111/jhn.13078. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
10
Use of the Baby-Led Weaning (BLW) Method in Complementary Feeding of the Infant-A Cross-Sectional Study of Mothers Using and Not Using the BLW Method.婴儿主导的离乳法(BLW)在婴儿补充喂养中的应用——使用和不使用 BLW 方法的母亲的横断面研究。
Nutrients. 2022 Jun 8;14(12):2372. doi: 10.3390/nu14122372.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Professionals' Knowledge, Perceptions, and Attitudes Toward Baby-Led Weaning: Scoping Review.卫生专业人员对婴儿主导式断奶的知识、认知和态度:范围综述
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Sep 27;10:23779608241285417. doi: 10.1177/23779608241285417. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Micronutrient Profile and Carbohydrate Microstructure of Commercially Prepared and Home Prepared Infant Fruit and Vegetable Purees.市售和家庭自制婴儿果蔬泥的微量营养素特征和碳水化合物微观结构。
Nutrients. 2022 Dec 22;15(1):45. doi: 10.3390/nu15010045.