• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医护人员对婴儿主导的离乳法的经验和看法。一项定性研究。

Experiences and opinions towards baby-led weaning by healthcare professionals. A qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.

Quirón Health Hospital, Almería, Spain.

出版信息

Pediatr Res. 2023 Nov;94(5):1784-1788. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02694-z. Epub 2023 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1038/s41390-023-02694-z
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Baby-led weaning (BLW) is an alternative method to spoon-feeding to introduce solid foods. This study aimed to describe and understand the experiences and opinions of pediatricians and pediatric nurse specialists of the implementation of the BLW approach.

METHODS

An interpretive descriptive qualitative research was carried out. A focus group with 7 participants and 13 face-to-face interviews were conducted between February and May 2022 (17 females and 3 males). All were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with the supported by Atlas.Ti qualitative data analysis software.

RESULTS

From the data, two themes developed: (1) BLW as an ideal method of introducing solid food, with the subthemes: "a natural method of introducing complementary feeding" and "BLW is a safe method"; (2) Perceived barriers to the uptake of the BLW method, with the subthemes: "a lack of BLW training prevents the best practice" and "the influence of family and social context on parents."

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare professionals perceive BLW to be a safe and natural weaning approach. The lack of training of healthcare professionals and the influence of family social context on parents may limit the implementation of BLW.

IMPACT

Baby-led weaning is perceived by healthcare professionals as a safe complementary feeding method that promotes chewing, improves growth, and the development of fine motor skills. However, lack of training of healthcare professionals and the family social context of the parents hinders the uptake of baby-led weaning. The views of the family and parents' social context about baby-led weaning may restrict their willingness to use the method. Family education delivered by healthcare professionals may avoid risks and allay parental anxieties about safety.

摘要

背景

婴儿主导的辅食添加(BLW)是一种替代勺喂的方法,用于引入固体食物。本研究旨在描述和了解儿科医生和儿科护士专家对 BLW 方法实施的经验和看法。

方法

采用解释性描述定性研究。2022 年 2 月至 5 月期间,进行了一次有 7 名参与者参加的焦点小组和 13 次面对面访谈(17 名女性和 3 名男性)。所有访谈均进行了录音、转录,并使用 Atlas.Ti 定性数据分析软件进行了分析。

结果

从数据中得出了两个主题:(1)BLW 是引入固体食物的理想方法,包括以下子主题:“引入补充喂养的自然方法”和“BLW 是一种安全的方法”;(2)BLW 方法实施的感知障碍,包括以下子主题:“缺乏 BLW 培训阻碍最佳实践”和“家庭和社会环境对父母的影响”。

结论

医疗保健专业人员认为 BLW 是一种安全且自然的断奶方法。医疗保健专业人员培训的缺乏以及父母家庭社会环境的影响可能会限制 BLW 的实施。

影响

医疗保健专业人员认为 BLW 是一种安全的补充喂养方法,可促进咀嚼、促进生长和发展精细运动技能。然而,医疗保健专业人员培训的缺乏以及父母的家庭社会环境会阻碍 BLW 的采用。家庭对 BLW 的看法和父母的社会背景可能会限制他们使用该方法的意愿。医疗保健专业人员提供的家庭教育可以避免风险,并减轻父母对安全的担忧。

相似文献

1
Experiences and opinions towards baby-led weaning by healthcare professionals. A qualitative study.医护人员对婴儿主导的离乳法的经验和看法。一项定性研究。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Nov;94(5):1784-1788. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02694-z. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
2
Baby-led weaning: Health professionals 'knowledge and attitudes and parents' experiences from Spain. A mixed methods approach.婴儿主导的离乳:来自西班牙的健康专业人员的知识、态度和父母的经验。混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jul;30(4):e1352-e1363. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13543. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
3
Baby-led weaning: A thematic analysis of comments made by parents using online parenting forums.婴儿自主进食:对使用在线育儿论坛的父母发表的评论进行的主题分析。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2023 Jun;36(3):772-786. doi: 10.1111/jhn.13078. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
4
Differences in dietary composition between infants introduced to complementary foods using Baby-led weaning and traditional spoon feeding.使用婴儿主导的自主进食法和传统勺喂法引入辅食的婴儿的饮食成分差异。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2019 Feb;32(1):11-20. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12616. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
5
The effect of baby-led weaning and traditional complementary feeding trainings on baby development.婴儿主导的断乳法和传统补充喂养训练对婴儿发育的影响。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2023 Nov-Dec;73:196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.09.006. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
6
Brazilian health professionals' perception about the Baby-Led Weaning (BLW) method for complementary feeding: an exploratory study.巴西卫生专业人员对婴儿主导的断乳法(BLW)用于补充喂养的看法:一项探索性研究。
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2021 Oct 4;40:e2020321. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2020321. eCollection 2021.
7
Baby-led complementary feeding: Randomized controlled study.婴儿主导的辅食添加:随机对照研究。
Pediatr Int. 2018 Dec;60(12):1073-1080. doi: 10.1111/ped.13671.
8
Relationship of baby led weaning to other parenting and feeding constructs.婴儿主导的断乳与其他育儿和喂养结构的关系。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2023 Nov-Dec;73:e639-e645. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.11.012. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
9
Knowledge and attitudes towards baby-led-weaning by health professionals and parents: A cross-sectional study.健康专业人员和家长对婴儿主导的断奶的知识和态度:一项横断面研究。
Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2022 Jun;32 Suppl 1:S64-S72. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcle.2021.04.005.
10
Comparison of food and nutrient intake in infants aged 6-12 months, following baby-led or traditional weaning: A cross-sectional study.6-12 月龄婴儿采用自主进食或传统方法添加辅食后食物及营养素摄入的比较:一项横断面研究。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022 Apr;35(2):310-324. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12947. Epub 2021 Sep 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Brazilian health professionals' perception about the Baby-Led Weaning (BLW) method for complementary feeding: an exploratory study.巴西卫生专业人员对婴儿主导的断乳法(BLW)用于补充喂养的看法:一项探索性研究。
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2021 Oct 4;40:e2020321. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2020321. eCollection 2021.
2
Baby-led weaning: Health professionals 'knowledge and attitudes and parents' experiences from Spain. A mixed methods approach.婴儿主导的离乳:来自西班牙的健康专业人员的知识、态度和父母的经验。混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jul;30(4):e1352-e1363. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13543. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
3
Baby-led weaning, an overview of the new approach to food introduction: integrative literature review.
婴儿主导的断奶法:食物引入新方法概述——综合文献综述
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2021 Aug 23;40:e2020507. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2020507. eCollection 2021.
4
Complementary Feeding Methods-A Review of the Benefits and Risks.辅助喂养方法——利益与风险综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 4;18(13):7165. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137165.
5
Interpretive description: A flexible qualitative methodology for medical education research.阐释性描述:医学教育研究的一种灵活的定性方法。
Med Educ. 2021 Mar;55(3):336-343. doi: 10.1111/medu.14380. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
6
BABY-LED WEANING, AN OVERVIEW OF THE NEW APPROACH TO FOOD INTRODUCTION: INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW.婴儿主导式断奶:食物引入新方法概述:综合文献综述
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2020 Jan 13;38:e2018084. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2020/38/2018084. eCollection 2020.
7
Standard . baby-led complementary feeding: a comparison of food and nutrient intakes in 6-12-month-old infants in the UK.标准婴儿主导的补充喂养:英国 6-12 个月大婴儿的食物和营养素摄入量比较。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Oct;22(15):2813-2822. doi: 10.1017/S136898001900082X. Epub 2019 May 16.
8
Perceptions of health professionals about the quality of communication and deliberation with the patient and its impact on the health decision making process.医疗专业人员对与患者沟通和商议的质量及其对健康决策过程的影响的看法。
J Public Health Res. 2018 Dec 20;7(3):1445. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2018.1445.
9
Differences in dietary composition between infants introduced to complementary foods using Baby-led weaning and traditional spoon feeding.使用婴儿主导的自主进食法和传统勺喂法引入辅食的婴儿的饮食成分差异。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2019 Feb;32(1):11-20. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12616. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
10
Food fussiness and early feeding characteristics of infants following Baby-Led Weaning and traditional spoon-feeding in New Zealand: An internet survey.新西兰婴儿主导式进食和传统勺喂法的婴儿的食物挑剔和早期喂养特征:一项网络调查。
Appetite. 2018 Nov 1;130:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.07.033. Epub 2018 Aug 2.