Suppr超能文献

计算机断层扫描对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者短期死亡率的预测价值:系统评价。

Predictive value of computed tomography for short-term mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Department of Radiology, Tokai University Hospital, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 10;12(1):9579. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13972-x.

Abstract

The best available evidence and the predictive value of computed tomography (CT) findings for prognosis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are unknown. We systematically searched three electronic databases (MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov). A total of 410 patients from six observational studies were included in this systematic review. Of these, 143 patients (34.9%) died due to ARDS in short-term. As for CT grade, the CTs used ranged from 4- to 320-row. The index test included diffuse attenuations in one study, affected lung in one study, well-aerated lung region/predicted total lung capacity in one study, CT score in one study and high-resolution CT score in two studies. Considering the CT findings, pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 62% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30-88%), 76% (95% CI 57-89%), 2.58 (95% CI 2.05-2.73), 0.50 (95% CI 0.21-0.79), and 5.16 (95% CI 2.59-3.46), respectively. This systematic review revealed that there were major differences in the definitions of CT findings, and that the integration of CT findings might not be adequate for predicting short-term mortality in ARDS. Standardisation of CT findings and accumulation of further studies by CT with unified standards are warranted.

摘要

目前尚不清楚最佳的现有证据以及计算机断层扫描 (CT) 结果在急性呼吸窘迫综合征 (ARDS) 患者预后预测中的价值。我们系统地检索了三个电子数据库(MEDLINE、CENTRAL 和 ClinicalTrials.gov)。这项系统综述共纳入了来自六项观察性研究的 410 名患者。其中,143 名患者(34.9%)在短期内因 ARDS 死亡。就 CT 分级而言,所使用的 CT 范围从 4 排到 320 排。在一项研究中,指数试验包括弥漫性衰减,一项研究中包括受累肺,一项研究中包括充气良好的肺区/预测总肺活量,一项研究中包括 CT 评分,两项研究中包括高分辨率 CT 评分。考虑到 CT 结果,合并后的敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和诊断比值比分别为 62%(95%置信区间 [CI] 30-88%)、76%(95% CI 57-89%)、2.58(95% CI 2.05-2.73)、0.50(95% CI 0.21-0.79)和 5.16(95% CI 2.59-3.46)。本系统评价表明,CT 结果的定义存在较大差异,整合 CT 结果可能不足以预测 ARDS 的短期死亡率。有必要对 CT 结果进行标准化,并通过具有统一标准的 CT 进一步开展研究以积累数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0762/9187712/e62f27451ced/41598_2022_13972_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验