• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上颌即刻种植并采用牙槽窝保护技术:1 年随访的前瞻性病例系列评估。

Immediate implant placement with socket shield technique in the maxilla: a prospective case series evaluation at 1-year follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Arab American University, Jenin, Palestinian Territory, P. Box: 240, Jenin, Israel.

出版信息

Head Face Med. 2022 Jun 10;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13005-022-00324-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13005-022-00324-3
PMID:35689246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9185963/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aims of this case series were to investigate the clinical, radiographic, implant success, complication incidence, esthetic, and patient-reported outcomes of 10 immediately placed implants associated with the socket shield technique at 12 months post-loading and to assess the ridge width changes that occurred at 8 months following implant placement.

METHODS

A total of 10 patients received 10 socket shield immediate implants (MegaGen AnyRidge). At 8 months postimplantation, casts were made to assess the ridge width changes by measuring the ridge width at the implant sites and comparing them with the corresponding measurements at the contralateral tooth site. At 12 months post-loading, clinical indices, marginal bone loss, pink esthetic score, and patient-assessed outcomes were evaluated. The mean, standard deviation and median were calculated for all continuous variables.

RESULTS

All implants demonstrated a 100% success rate, while 2 implants presented with external shield exposure that was managed successfully. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.08 ± 0.14 mm mesially and 0.21 ± 0.23 mm distally. Esthetic evaluation yielded an average modified pink esthetic score of 8.65. A mean gain of 0.17 mm in the facial-palatal ridge width was recorded at 8 months postimplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The socket shield technique enhanced the functional and esthetic results by preserving the alveolar bone and peri-implant soft tissues. However, this is a sensitive technique and still needs more robust evidence before it can be recommended for everyday clinical practice.

摘要

背景

本病例系列研究旨在探讨 10 例即刻植入物联合种植体套筒保护技术在负荷 12 个月时的临床、影像学、种植体成功率、并发症发生率、美观和患者报告结果,并评估种植体植入后 8 个月时牙槽嵴宽度的变化。

方法

共 10 例患者接受了 10 个种植体套筒保护即刻植入物(MegaGen AnyRidge)。在种植体植入后 8 个月,通过测量种植体部位的牙槽嵴宽度并与对侧同名牙部位的相应测量值进行比较,制取印模以评估牙槽嵴宽度的变化。在负荷后 12 个月,评估临床指数、边缘骨丧失、粉色美学评分和患者评估结果。所有连续变量的平均值、标准差和中位数均进行了计算。

结果

所有种植体均达到 100%的成功率,而 2 个种植体出现了外部保护套暴露的情况,但得到了成功处理。平均近中边缘骨丧失为 0.08 ± 0.14mm,远中为 0.21 ± 0.23mm。美学评估的平均改良粉色美学评分为 8.65。种植体植入后 8 个月,颊腭侧牙槽嵴宽度平均增加 0.17mm。

结论

种植体套筒保护技术通过保留牙槽骨和种植体周围软组织,提高了功能和美观效果。然而,这是一种敏感的技术,在推荐用于日常临床实践之前,还需要更多的有力证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/92ec40d365fe/13005_2022_324_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/97167fffc969/13005_2022_324_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/7c44a1a36938/13005_2022_324_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/ee0aba57807a/13005_2022_324_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/254f1a7d3e22/13005_2022_324_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/054f3798e913/13005_2022_324_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/064d79ce549d/13005_2022_324_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/6aa273e0d49c/13005_2022_324_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/b52d71879303/13005_2022_324_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/471daf49b8e5/13005_2022_324_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/e0e03fcc7277/13005_2022_324_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/129d9581b6f4/13005_2022_324_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/3013a9531c48/13005_2022_324_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/92ec40d365fe/13005_2022_324_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/97167fffc969/13005_2022_324_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/7c44a1a36938/13005_2022_324_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/ee0aba57807a/13005_2022_324_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/254f1a7d3e22/13005_2022_324_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/054f3798e913/13005_2022_324_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/064d79ce549d/13005_2022_324_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/6aa273e0d49c/13005_2022_324_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/b52d71879303/13005_2022_324_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/471daf49b8e5/13005_2022_324_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/e0e03fcc7277/13005_2022_324_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/129d9581b6f4/13005_2022_324_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/3013a9531c48/13005_2022_324_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e06/9185963/92ec40d365fe/13005_2022_324_Fig13_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Immediate implant placement with socket shield technique in the maxilla: a prospective case series evaluation at 1-year follow-up.上颌即刻种植并采用牙槽窝保护技术:1 年随访的前瞻性病例系列评估。
Head Face Med. 2022 Jun 10;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13005-022-00324-3.
2
Socket shield technique and delayed implant placement in maxilla: a series of five case reports.Socket shield technique and delayed implant placement in maxilla: a series of five case reports. 上颌窦提升同期种植体延期植入:五例病例系列报告。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 5;22(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02149-7.
3
Immediate Tooth Replacement in the Esthetic Zone with the Socket Shield Technique and a Novel Body-Shift Implant: A Pilot Study with Up to 3 Years of Follow-up.即刻牙种植修复在美学区的应用:Socket Shield 技术和新型体位移植体的初步研究(长达 3 年的随访结果)。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2023 Oct 24(7):s107-s117. doi: 10.11607/prd.6446.
4
Evaluation of soft tissue and labial plate of bone stability with immediate implant in direct contact versus gap with socket shield: A randomized clinical trial with 1 year follow-up.即刻种植体直接接触与使用 socket shield 保持间隙对软组织和牙槽嵴稳定性的评估:一项为期 1 年的随机临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Oct;24(5):548-558. doi: 10.1111/cid.13117. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
5
Navigation guided socket-shield technique for implant and pontic sites in the esthetic zone: A proof-of-concept 1-year prospective study with immediate implant placement and loading.导航引导的种植体和桥体位点 socket-shield 技术:即刻种植即刻负载的 1 年前瞻性临床研究。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Jan;34(1):203-214. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12867. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
6
Immediate non-occlusal loading of immediate post-extractive versus delayed placement of single implants in preserved sockets of the anterior maxilla: 1-year post-loading outcome of a randomised controlled trial.上颌前部保存牙槽窝内即刻种植体即刻非咬合负重与延期种植的比较:一项随机对照试验的负重后1年结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Winter;8(4):361-72.
7
Immediate loading of post-extractive versus delayed placed single implants in the anterior maxilla: outcome of a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial 1-year after loading.上颌前部拔牙后即刻种植与延期种植单颗种植体的即刻负重:一项实用多中心随机对照试验负重1年后的结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Winter;8(4):347-58.
8
A retrospective evaluation of 128 socket-shield cases in the esthetic zone and posterior sites: Partial extraction therapy with up to 4 years follow-up.回顾性评估 128 例美学区和后牙区种植覆盖义齿病例:最长 4 年的随访结果。部分拔牙病例。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Apr;20(2):122-129. doi: 10.1111/cid.12554. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
9
Comparison of the soft and hard peri-implant tissue dimensional changes around single immediate implants in the esthetic zone with socket shield technique versus using xenograft: A randomized controlled clinical trial.在美学区,采用 socket shield 技术与使用异种移植物相比,比较单即刻种植体周围软硬组织的尺寸变化:一项随机对照临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Jun;23(3):456-465. doi: 10.1111/cid.13008. Epub 2021 May 24.
10
Immediate and flapless implant insertion and provisionalization using autogenous bone grafts in the esthetic zone: 5-year results.即刻无瓣种植及使用自体骨移植在美学区进行种植体植入和临时修复:5 年结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Mar;29(3):320-327. doi: 10.1111/clr.13119.

引用本文的文献

1
Socket Shield Technique in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival, Aesthetic Outcomes, and Complications.种植义齿中的套筒冠技术:一项关于生存率、美学效果及并发症的系统评价与Meta分析
Cureus. 2025 Jun 1;17(6):e85176. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85176. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Comparison of Three-Dimensional Bone Changes in Socket Shield Technique Versus Immediate Implant Placement - A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial.牙槽嵴保护技术与即刻种植三维骨变化的比较——一项非随机临床试验
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2788-S2790. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_322_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
3
Clinical and Radiographical Evaluation of Immediate Loading of Narrow Diameter Dental Implants.

本文引用的文献

1
The socket shield technique for immediate implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Socket 盾技术在即刻种植体植入中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Dec;33(8):1186-1200. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12812. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
2
Failure Rate, Marginal Bone Loss, and Pink Esthetic with Socket-Shield Technique for Immediate Dental Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.美学区即刻牙种植体植入的牙槽窝屏蔽技术的失败率、边缘骨丢失及粉色美学效果:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Biology (Basel). 2021 Jun 18;10(6):549. doi: 10.3390/biology10060549.
3
Socket shield technique vs conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization. Randomized clinical trial.
窄直径牙种植体即刻负重的临床与影像学评估
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 1):S333-S335. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_589_22. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
Socket shield 技术与传统即刻种植即刻临时修复的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Oct;22(5):602-611. doi: 10.1111/cid.12938. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
4
A decade of the socket-shield technique: a step-by-step partial extraction therapy protocol.种植体肩台保护技术十年:分步式部分牙拔除治疗方案
Int J Esthet Dent. 2020;15(2):212-225.
5
Esthetics and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Implants Placed with Guided Bone Regeneration and Complete Native Bone: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial.引导骨再生和完整原生骨植入的美学和患者报告结局:一项前瞻性对照临床试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):406-414. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7751.
6
Comparing conventional flap-less immediate implantation and socket-shield technique for esthetic and clinical outcomes: A randomized clinical study.比较无瓣即刻种植与牙槽窝保护技术在美学和临床效果方面的差异:一项随机临床研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Feb;31(2):181-191. doi: 10.1111/clr.13554. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
7
Socket-shield technique for implant placement to stabilize the facial gingival and osseous architecture: A systematic review.用于种植体植入以稳定面部牙龈和骨结构的套接字屏蔽技术:一项系统评价。
J Investig Clin Dent. 2019 Nov;10(4):e12449. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12449. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
8
Volumetric alterations around single-tooth implants using the socket-shield technique: preliminary results of a prospective case series.使用牙槽嵴保护技术的单颗牙种植体周围的容积改变:一项前瞻性病例系列的初步结果
Int J Esthet Dent. 2018;13(2):146-170.
9
Postextraction Dental Implant in the Aesthetic Zone, Socket Shield Technique Versus Conventional Protocol.美学区拔牙后牙种植,牙槽窝保护技术与传统方案对比
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jun;29(4):1037-1041. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004419.
10
A retrospective evaluation of 128 socket-shield cases in the esthetic zone and posterior sites: Partial extraction therapy with up to 4 years follow-up.回顾性评估 128 例美学区和后牙区种植覆盖义齿病例:最长 4 年的随访结果。部分拔牙病例。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Apr;20(2):122-129. doi: 10.1111/cid.12554. Epub 2017 Nov 26.