• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An Examination of Factors Affecting State Legislators' Support for Parity Laws for Different Mental Illnesses.不同精神疾病平等法律的州立法者支持因素的考察。
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Jan;59(1):122-131. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-00991-1. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
2
Factors associated with state legislators' support for opioid use disorder parity laws.与州立法者对阿片类药物使用障碍平权法支持相关的因素。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Aug;82:102792. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102792. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
3
State Legislators' Support for Behavioral Health Parity Laws: The Influence of Mutable and Fixed Factors at Multiple Levels.州立法者对行为健康平等法的支持:多层次可变因素和固定因素的影响
Milbank Q. 2019 Dec;97(4):1200-1232. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12431. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
Audience segmentation to disseminate behavioral health evidence to legislators: an empirical clustering analysis.向立法者传播行为健康证据的受众细分:一项实证聚类分析。
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 19;13(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0816-8.
5
Legislators' Sources of Behavioral Health Research and Preferences for Dissemination: Variations by Political Party.立法者的行为健康研究来源和传播偏好:按政党划分的差异。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Oct 1;69(10):1105-1108. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800153. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
6
An audience research study to disseminate evidence about comprehensive state mental health parity legislation to US State policymakers: protocol.一项向美国州政策制定者传播有关全面州心理健康平权立法证据的受众研究:方案
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 26;12(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0613-9.
7
State legislators' attitudes and voting intentions toward tobacco control legislation.州立法者对烟草控制立法的态度和投票意向。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Jul;87(7):1197-200. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.7.1197.
8
State legislators' work on public health-related issues: what influences priorities?州立法者在公共卫生相关问题上的工作:哪些因素影响优先事项?
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):25-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318246475c.
9
Unintended consequences of disseminating behavioral health evidence to policymakers: Results from a survey-based experiment.向政策制定者传播行为健康证据的意外后果:基于调查的实验结果。
Implement Res Pract. 2023 May 8;4:26334895231172807. doi: 10.1177/26334895231172807. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
10
Caring for children with mental disorders: do state parity laws increase access to treatment?关爱患有精神障碍的儿童:州平价医疗法是否增加了治疗机会?
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2008 Jun;11(2):57-66.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental Health Treatment Access: Experience, Hypotheticals, and Public Opinion.心理健康治疗的可及性:经验、假设与公众意见
Milbank Q. 2025 Mar;103(1):100-129. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12726. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
2
Demographic variation in preferred sources for suicide prevention and mental health crisis services among U.S. adults.美国成年人在自杀预防和心理健康危机服务的首选来源方面的人口统计学差异。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Oct 19;47:102914. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102914. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Amplifying consumers as partners in dissemination and implementation science and practice.增强消费者作为传播与实施科学及实践合作伙伴的作用。
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Oct 11;4:26334895231205894. doi: 10.1177/26334895231205894. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Revisiting the policy ecology framework for implementation of evidence-based practices in mental health settings.重新审视精神卫生服务中实施基于证据的实践的政策生态框架。
Implement Sci. 2023 Nov 7;18(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01309-9.
5
On the Relationship Between Stakeholder Affiliation and Attitudes Toward Behavioral Health Reform in Kansas.堪萨斯州利益相关者归属与对行为健康改革态度之间的关系
Kans J Med. 2023 Feb 21;16(1):28-34. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol16.18542. eCollection 2023.

不同精神疾病平等法律的州立法者支持因素的考察。

An Examination of Factors Affecting State Legislators' Support for Parity Laws for Different Mental Illnesses.

机构信息

Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.

Department of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2023 Jan;59(1):122-131. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-00991-1. Epub 2022 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-022-00991-1
PMID:35689717
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9188272/
Abstract

Mental health parity legislation can improve mental health outcomes. U.S. state legislators determine whether state parity laws are adopted, making it critical to assess factors affecting policy support. This study examines the prevalence and demographic correlates of legislators' support for state parity laws for four mental illnesses- major depression disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia, and anorexia/bulimia. Using a 2017 cross-sectional survey of 475 U.S. legislators, we conducted bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression. Support for parity was highest for schizophrenia (57%), PTSD (55%), and major depression (53%) and lowest for anorexia/bulimia (40%). Support for parity was generally higher among females, more liberal legislators, legislators in the Northeast region of the country, and those who had previously sought treatment for mental illness. These findings highlight the importance of better disseminating evidence about anorexia/bulimia and can inform dissemination efforts about mental health parity laws to state legislators.

摘要

精神健康平权立法可以改善精神健康结果。美国州立法者决定是否通过州平权法,因此评估影响政策支持的因素至关重要。本研究调查了立法者支持四种精神疾病(重度抑郁症、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、精神分裂症和厌食症/贪食症)的州平权法的流行率和人口统计学相关性。使用 2017 年对 475 名美国立法者进行的横断面调查,我们进行了双变量分析和多变量逻辑回归。对平权的支持率最高的是精神分裂症(57%)、创伤后应激障碍(55%)和重度抑郁症(53%),对厌食症/贪食症的支持率最低(40%)。平权的支持率通常在女性、更自由的立法者、来自美国东北部地区的立法者以及那些曾经寻求精神疾病治疗的立法者中更高。这些发现强调了更好地传播关于厌食症/贪食症的证据的重要性,并可以为向州立法者传播精神健康平权法提供信息。