Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, and Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):25-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318246475c.
Policies are an effective way to influence population health and prevent disease. Unfortunately, public health research is often not well translated for policy audiences. Furthermore, researchers seeking to influence policy face an incomplete understanding of what influences legislators' decisions regarding which issues will receive their limited time and focus.
The objective of this analysis was to examine various factors that may influence state legislators' decisions about which health issues they address.
Cross-sectional analysis of data collected from a randomized trial.
State legislatures.
State-level legislators.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Measures included a rating of the influence of various factors on health policy priorities. A 7-point scale was used to measure political ideology on social and fiscal issues. Standard demographic questions were included on age, gender, and level of education.
Seventy-five legislators completed surveys. Sixty-three percent were aged 55 years or older, and 76% male. When they were asked to rate factors according to importance in determining what health issues to work on, the top-rated factor was constituents' needs or opinions followed by evidence of scientific effectiveness. Ratings were also examined by subgroups.
These findings point to several important applications for public health practitioners and researchers. Because legislators value constituents' opinions, it is critical to inform and educate constituents about public health issues as well as policy options that may be effective in addressing problems. The results also highlight the importance of public health researchers and practitioners improving dissemination efforts to ensure that evidence-based scientific information is shared with policymakers in an effective and timely manner.
政策是影响人口健康和预防疾病的有效手段。然而,公共卫生研究往往未能很好地转化为政策受众所需的内容。此外,寻求影响政策的研究人员对影响立法者决策的因素了解不完整,不知道哪些问题将获得他们有限的时间和关注。
本分析旨在研究可能影响州立法者决定解决哪些健康问题的各种因素。
对随机试验收集的数据进行的横断面分析。
州立法机构。
州一级的立法者。
包括对各种因素对健康政策优先事项的影响的评估。使用 7 分制来衡量社会和财政问题上的政治意识形态。包括年龄、性别和教育程度等标准人口统计问题。
75 名立法者完成了调查。63%的人年龄在 55 岁或以上,76%是男性。当他们被要求根据对确定要解决的健康问题的重要性对因素进行评分时,排名最高的因素是选民的需求或意见,其次是科学有效性的证据。评分还按小组进行了检查。
这些发现为公共卫生从业人员和研究人员指出了几个重要的应用方向。由于立法者重视选民的意见,因此告知和教育选民了解公共卫生问题以及可能有效解决问题的政策选择至关重要。结果还强调了公共卫生研究人员和从业人员加强传播工作的重要性,以确保将基于证据的科学信息以有效和及时的方式与政策制定者分享。