• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国上海医院选择性与常规性会阴切开术用于阴道分娩的比较:政策比较。

Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal births in Shanghai hospitals, China: a comparison of policies.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.

Ministry of Education-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health, and Department of Obstetrics, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao-Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jun 11;22(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04790-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-022-04790-0
PMID:35690738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9188710/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the effects of policy of selective versus routine episiotomy on mother and baby for women delivering vaginally in Shanghai and whether the hospital type has any effect on the outcomes.

METHOD

This was a multi-center retrospective cohort study in Shanghai between March 2015 and May 2017. The study population were vaginal births with selective or routine episiotomy (n = 5478) in 20 secondary or tertiary hospitals. Main Outcome Measure was the incidence of severe perineal lacerations. The adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by logistic regression and presented as the effect sizes. All models were stratified by the utilization of level (secondary and tertiary) and type (general and Obstetric) of hospital.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was not significantly different between vaginal births with routine and selective episiotomy. Patients with selective episiotomy had a lower risk of postpartum hemorrhage, and newborns in the selective episiotomy group had a lower risk of shoulder dystocia and Neonatal Ward compared to those with routine episiotomy. Newborns in selective episiotomy group had a lower risk of birth injury in tertiary hospital. However, newborns in selective episiotomy group had a higher risk of birth injury in general hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Selective episiotomy is safe and can be recommended over routine episiotomy in obstetric and tertiary hospital settings in China.

摘要

背景

评估上海阴道分娩产妇选择性会阴切开术与常规会阴切开术对母婴的影响,以及医院类型是否对结局有影响。

方法

这是 2015 年 3 月至 2017 年 5 月在上海进行的一项多中心回顾性队列研究。研究人群为 20 家二级或三级医院选择性或常规会阴切开术(n=5478)的阴道分娩产妇。主要结局指标为严重会阴裂伤的发生率。采用 logistic 回归估计调整后的优势比(aOR)和 95%置信区间(CI),并以效应大小表示。所有模型均按医院使用的级别(二级和三级)和类型(普通和产科)分层。

结果

常规会阴切开术与选择性会阴切开术分娩的主要结局无显著差异。选择性会阴切开术产妇产后出血风险较低,选择性会阴切开术组新生儿肩难产和新生儿病房入住风险低于常规会阴切开术组。选择性会阴切开术组新生儿在三级医院发生分娩损伤的风险较低。然而,选择性会阴切开术组新生儿在综合医院发生分娩损伤的风险较高。

结论

选择性会阴切开术是安全的,在中国产科和三级医院环境中可推荐替代常规会阴切开术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba3/9188710/cdc83aae4e6e/12884_2022_4790_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba3/9188710/798799c2251f/12884_2022_4790_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba3/9188710/7e6242b1e78b/12884_2022_4790_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba3/9188710/58c39848df56/12884_2022_4790_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba3/9188710/0a6d2bfe38f5/12884_2022_4790_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba3/9188710/3365eb81f716/12884_2022_4790_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba3/9188710/cdc83aae4e6e/12884_2022_4790_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba3/9188710/798799c2251f/12884_2022_4790_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba3/9188710/7e6242b1e78b/12884_2022_4790_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba3/9188710/58c39848df56/12884_2022_4790_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba3/9188710/0a6d2bfe38f5/12884_2022_4790_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba3/9188710/3365eb81f716/12884_2022_4790_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba3/9188710/cdc83aae4e6e/12884_2022_4790_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal births in Shanghai hospitals, China: a comparison of policies.中国上海医院选择性与常规性会阴切开术用于阴道分娩的比较:政策比较。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jun 11;22(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04790-0.
2
Prevalence and contributing factors of severe perineal damage following episiotomy-assisted vaginal delivery.会阴切开术辅助阴道分娩后严重会阴损伤的发生率及影响因素。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;53(4):481-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2013.07.002.
3
Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study.第二产程时长及器械助产作为严重会阴裂伤的危险因素:基于人群的研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Feb 21;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1251-6.
4
A randomised controlled trial in comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes between hands-and-knees delivery position and supine position in China.中国一项比较手膝位分娩姿势与仰卧位分娩姿势的母婴结局的随机对照试验。
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:117-124. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.03.022. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
5
Identification of women at high risk for severe perineal lacerations.识别严重会阴裂伤高危女性。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Nov;182:11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.031. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
6
Restrictive versus routine episiotomy among Southeast Asian term pregnancies: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.限制与常规会阴切开术在东南亚足月产中的应用比较:一项多中心随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2020 Feb;127(3):397-403. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15982. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
7
The impact of selective episiotomy on maternal short-term morbidity: a retrospective study.选择性会阴切开术对产妇短期发病率的影响:一项回顾性研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Dec;44(1):2369664. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2024.2369664. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
8
No episiotomy versus selective lateral/mediolateral episiotomy (EPITRIAL): an interim analysis.非会阴切开术与选择性侧切/中侧切术(EPITRIAL):一项中期分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):415-423. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3480-7. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
9
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries among women with gestational diabetes and women without gestational diabetes: A NSW population-based cohort study.妊娠期糖尿病女性与非妊娠期糖尿病女性的产科肛门括约肌损伤:一项基于新南威尔士州人群的队列研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Oct;59(5):662-669. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12950. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
10
Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum.手术助产阴道分娩与会阴正中切开术:会阴的不良组合。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;195(3):749-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.078.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting Respectful Maternity Care by Reducing Unnecessary Episiotomies: Experiences from Centers of Excellence for Breastfeeding in Vietnam.通过减少不必要的会阴切开术促进尊重孕产妇护理:越南母乳喂养卓越中心的经验。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 12;11(18):2520. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182520.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of a selective use of episiotomy combined with Couder's maneuver for the perineal protection.选择性会阴切开术联合 Couder 手法用于保护会阴的效果。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;302(1):77-83. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05572-9. Epub 2020 May 9.
2
Episiotomy: history, present and future - a review.会阴切开术:历史、现状与未来——综述
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Apr;35(7):1386-1391. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1755647. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
3
Prevalence of Cesarean Section and Its Indications in A Tertiary Care Hospital.
三级护理医院剖宫产的患病率及其指征
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2019 Mar-Apr;57(216):70-73. doi: 10.31729/jnma.4282.
4
Episiotomy in modern clinical practice: friend or foe?现代临床实践中的会阴切开术:是福是祸?
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 May;30(5):669-671. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03912-1. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
5
How did episiotomy rates change from 2007 to 2014? Population-based study in France.2007 年至 2014 年会阴切开率如何变化?法国基于人群的研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1747-8.
6
Large reductions in cesarean delivery rates in China: a qualitative study on delivery decision-making in the era of the two-child policy.中国剖宫产率大幅下降:两孩政策时代的分娩决策定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 4;17(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1597-9.
7
Long- and short-term complications of episiotomy.会阴切开术的长期和短期并发症。
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;13(3):144-148. doi: 10.4274/tjod.00087. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
8
Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial.选择性会阴切开术与实施非会阴切开术方案的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Reprod Health. 2017 Apr 24;14(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0315-4.
9
Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.经阴道分娩时会阴切开术的选择性使用与常规使用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 8;2(2):CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3.
10
Geographic Variations and Temporal Trends in Cesarean Delivery Rates in China, 2008-2014.中国 2008-2014 年剖宫产率的地域差异和时间趋势。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 3;317(1):69-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.18663.