Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Vision Res. 2022 Aug;197:108047. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108047. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
Visual texture is an important cue to figure-ground organization. While processing of texture differences is a prerequisite for the use of this cue to extract figure-ground organization, these stages are distinct processes. One potential indicator of this distinction is the possibility that texture statistics play a different role in the figure vs. in the ground. To determine whether this is the case, we probed figure-ground processing with a family of local image statistics that specified textures that varied in the strength and spatial scale of structure, and the extent to which features are oriented. For image statistics that generated approximately isotropic textures, the threshold for identification of figure-ground structure was determined by the difference in correlation strength in figure vs. ground, independent of whether the correlations were present in figure, ground, or both. However, for image statistics with strong orientation content, thresholds were up to two times higher for correlations in the ground, vs. the figure. This held equally for texture-defined objects with convex or concave boundaries, indicating that these threshold differences are driven by border ownership, not boundary shape. Similar threshold differences were found for presentation times ranging from 125 to 500 ms. These findings identify a qualitative difference in how texture is used for figure-ground analysis, vs. texture discrimination. Additionally, it reveals a functional recursion: texture differences are needed to identify tentative boundaries and consequent scene organization into figure and ground, but then scene organization modifies sensitivity to texture differences according to the figure-ground assignment.
视觉纹理是用于组织图形与背景的重要线索。尽管处理纹理差异是使用此线索提取图形与背景组织的前提条件,但这些阶段是截然不同的过程。区分这些阶段的一个潜在指标是纹理统计信息在图形与背景中可能发挥不同作用。为了确定是否如此,我们使用一系列特定纹理的局部图像统计信息来探测图形与背景的处理,这些纹理在结构强度和空间尺度以及特征定向程度上有所不同。对于生成近似各向同性纹理的图像统计信息,图形与背景结构的识别阈值由图形与背景中相关强度的差异决定,而与相关信息是存在于图形、背景还是两者都无关。然而,对于具有强烈定向内容的图像统计信息,地面的相关阈值比图形的阈值高 2 倍。对于具有凸形或凹形边界的纹理定义对象,这同样适用,表明这些阈值差异是由边界所有权而不是边界形状驱动的。在 125 到 500 毫秒的呈现时间范围内都发现了类似的阈值差异。这些发现确定了纹理在图形与背景分析中与纹理辨别之间的使用存在定性差异。此外,它揭示了一种功能递归:需要纹理差异来识别暂定边界,并根据图形-背景分配来修改对纹理差异的敏感性。