Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Neuroimage. 2021 May 15;232:117920. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117920. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
Despite over two decades of research on the neural mechanisms underlying human visual scene, or place, processing, it remains unknown what exactly a "scene" is. Intuitively, we are always inside a scene, while interacting with the outside of objects. Hence, we hypothesize that one diagnostic feature of a scene may be concavity, portraying "inside", and predict that if concavity is a scene-diagnostic feature, then: 1) images that depict concavity, even non-scene images (e.g., the "inside" of an object - or concave object), will be behaviorally categorized as scenes more often than those that depict convexity, and 2) the cortical scene-processing system will respond more to concave images than to convex images. As predicted, participants categorized concave objects as scenes more often than convex objects, and, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), two scene-selective cortical regions (the parahippocampal place area, PPA, and the occipital place area, OPA) responded significantly more to concave than convex objects. Surprisingly, we found no behavioral or neural differences between images of concave versus convex buildings. However, in a follow-up experiment, using tightly-controlled images, we unmasked a selective sensitivity to concavity over convexity of scene boundaries (i.e., walls) in PPA and OPA. Furthermore, we found that even highly impoverished line drawings of concave shapes are behaviorally categorized as scenes more often than convex shapes. Together, these results provide converging behavioral and neural evidence that concavity is a diagnostic feature of visual scenes.
尽管对人类视觉场景(或地点)处理的神经机制进行了二十多年的研究,但仍然不清楚什么是“场景”。直观地说,我们总是在一个场景中,同时与物体的外部相互作用。因此,我们假设一个场景的诊断特征可能是凹度,描绘“内部”,并预测如果凹度是场景的诊断特征,那么:1)描绘凹度的图像,即使是非场景图像(例如,物体的“内部”-或凹面物体),也将比描绘凸度的图像更频繁地被行为归类为场景,2)皮质场景处理系统对凹面图像的反应比对凸面图像的反应更大。正如所预测的那样,参与者将凹面物体归类为场景的次数多于凸面物体,并且使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI),两个与场景选择性相关的皮质区域(旁海马位置区,PPA 和枕部位置区,OPA)对凹面物体的反应明显大于凸面物体。令人惊讶的是,我们在凹面和凸面建筑图像之间没有发现行为或神经差异。然而,在后续实验中,使用严格控制的图像,我们揭示了 PPA 和 OPA 中对场景边界(即墙壁)的凹度与凸度的选择性敏感性。此外,我们发现,即使是高度简化的凹形线图也比凸形线图更频繁地被行为归类为场景。总之,这些结果提供了行为和神经证据的收敛,表明凹度是视觉场景的一个诊断特征。