Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Leiden Intensive Care Focused Echography (ALIFE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2022 Sep;48(9):1833-1839. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
Ultrasonography of the diaphragm in the zone of apposition has become increasingly popular to evaluate muscle thickness and thickening fraction. However, measurements in this anatomical location are frequently hindered by factors that constrain physical accessibility or that alter diaphragm position. Therefore, other anatomical positions at the chest wall for transducer placement are used, but the variability in diaphragm thickness across the dome has not been systematically studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate anatomical variation of diaphragm thickness in 46 healthy volunteers on three ventrodorsal lines and two craniocaudal positions on these three lines. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for diaphragm thickness in the craniocaudal direction on the mid-axillary line was significantly higher than those on the posterior axillary and midclavicular lines, suggesting it had the lowest variability (ICC = .89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.93, ICC = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62-0.85, ICC = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43-0.47, p < 0.05). Average diaphragm thickness was comparable on the posterior axillary and midaxillary lines and substantially larger on the midclavicular line (1.24 mm [1.06-1.47], 1.27 mm [1.10-1.42] and 2.32 [1.97-2.70], p < 0.01). We conclude that the normal diaphragm has a large variability in thickness, especially in the ventrodorsal direction. Variability in craniocaudal position is the lowest at the midaxillary line, which therefore appears to be the preferred site for diaphragm thickness measurement.
超声检查膈在贴附区,已成为评估肌肉厚度和增厚分数越来越受欢迎。然而,在这个解剖位置的测量经常受到限制物理可达性或改变膈肌位置的因素。因此,使用其他在胸壁的解剖位置来放置换能器,但横膈膜厚度在穹顶的变化没有进行系统研究。本研究的目的是评估 46 名健康志愿者在三个腹背线上和这三条线的两个颅尾位置的膈厚度的解剖变异。腋中线的膈厚度的组内相关系数(ICC)明显高于腋后线和锁骨中线,提示其变异性最低(ICC=0.89,95%置信区间:0.83-0.93,ICC=0.74,95%置信区间:0.62-0.85,ICC=0.62,95%置信区间:0.43-0.47,p<0.05)。在腋后线和腋中线上的平均膈厚度是可比的,而在锁骨中线上的厚度显著更大(1.24 毫米[1.06-1.47]、1.27 毫米[1.10-1.42]和 2.32[1.97-2.70],p<0.01)。我们得出结论,正常的横膈膜在厚度上有很大的变化,特别是在腹背方向。颅尾位置的变化在腋中线上是最低的,因此似乎是测量膈厚度的首选部位。