2008 - 2019年治疗完整性报告
Treatment Integrity Reporting in 2008-2019.
作者信息
Falakfarsa Galan, Brand Denys, Jones Lea, Godinez Erik S, Richardson Deborah C, Hanson Robbie J, Velazquez Savannah D, Wills Colin
机构信息
Department of Psychology, California State University, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95819-6007 USA.
出版信息
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 May 3;15(2):443-453. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00573-9. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Treatment integrity is the extent to which procedures are implemented in a manner consistent with their prescribed protocols and is necessary for reaching accurate conclusions regarding functional relations between dependent (i.e., behavior) and independent (i.e., the environment) variables. Several studies assessing the frequency that studies report treatment integrity have been conducted. However, no review has included articles from Thus, the current study reviewed between 2008 and 2019 to assess the frequency of studies reporting treatment integrity data. A total of 193 articles consisting of 205 studies met the inclusionary criteria for this review. Ninety-six studies (46.83%) reported treatment integrity data, compared to 193 (94.15%) that provided interobserver agreement data. Additionally, 98 studies (47.80%) were considered high risk for treatment implementation inaccuracies. Recommendations and implications for research and practice are discussed.
治疗完整性是指程序按照其规定方案实施的程度，对于得出关于因变量（即行为）和自变量（即环境）之间功能关系的准确结论而言，这是必要的。已经开展了多项研究来评估研究报告治疗完整性的频率。然而，尚无综述纳入[具体来源未提及]的文章。因此，本研究回顾了2008年至2019年间的[相关内容未明确]，以评估报告治疗完整性数据的研究频率。共有193篇文章（包含205项研究）符合本综述的纳入标准。96项研究（46.83%）报告了治疗完整性数据，相比之下，有193项研究（94.15%）提供了观察者间一致性数据。此外，98项研究（47.80%）被认为存在治疗实施不准确的高风险。文中讨论了对研究和实践的建议及影响。
Zotero 插件