New England Center for Children, Southborough, Massachusetts 01772, USA.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Spring;45(1):69-82. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-69.
Research suggests that inexperienced individuals cannot accurately implement stimulus preference assessments given written instructions alone. Training that includes written instructions supplemented with feedback from a professional with expertise in conducting preference assessments has proven effective; unfortunately, expert-facilitated direct training may not be widely available. In the current study, we used multiple baseline designs to evaluate the efficacy of an antecedent-only self-instructional package to train staff members to implement two methods of stimulus preference assessments. Accuracy was low when participants had access to written instructions alone. When access to enhanced written instructions was provided (i.e., technical jargon was minimized; instructions included pictures, diagrams, and step-by-step examples), inexperienced staff accurately implemented the assessments. Results are discussed in terms of opportunities to disseminate behavior-analytic technologies through self-instruction and print resources.
研究表明,仅凭书面说明,缺乏经验的个体无法准确实施刺激偏好评估。包含书面说明和来自具有偏好评估专业知识的专业人员反馈的培训已被证明是有效的;不幸的是,专家协助的直接培训可能无法广泛获得。在当前的研究中,我们使用多个基线设计来评估仅使用前因的自我指导包培训员工实施两种刺激偏好评估方法的效果。当参与者仅获得书面说明时,准确性较低。当提供增强的书面说明时(即,尽量减少技术术语;说明包括图片、图表和逐步示例),缺乏经验的员工准确地实施了评估。结果将从自我指导和印刷资源传播行为分析技术的机会方面进行讨论。