Suppr超能文献

与高清结肠镜检查相比,智能电子分光技术(i-scan)是否能提高腺瘤检出率?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Does i-scan improve adenoma detection rate compared to high-definition colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Aziz Muhammad, Ahmed Zohaib, Haghbin Hossein, Pervez Asad, Goyal Hemant, Kamal Faisal, Kobeissy Abdallah, Nawras Ali, Adler Douglas G

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2022 Jun 10;10(6):E824-E831. doi: 10.1055/a-1794-0346. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Recent studies evaluated the impact of i-scan in improving the adenoma detection rate (ADR) compared to high-definition (HD) colonoscopy. We aimed to systematically review and analyze the impact of this technique. A thorough search of the following databases was undertaken: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science. Full-text RCTs and cohort studies directly comparing i-scan and HD colonoscopy were deemed eligible for inclusion. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled and compared using random effects model and DerSimonian-Laird approach. For each outcome, relative risk (RR), 95 % confidence interval (CI), and value was generated.  < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of five studies with six arms were included in this analysis. A total of 2620 patients (mean age 58.6 ± 7.2 years and female proportion 44.8 %) completed the study and were included in our analysis. ADR was significantly higher with any i-scan (RR: 1.20, [CI: 1.06-1.34],  = 0.003) compared to HD colonoscopy. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that ADR was significantly higher using i-scan with surface and contrast enhancement only (RR: 1.25, [CI: 1.07-1.47],  = 0.004). i-scan has the potential to increase ADR using the surface and contrast enhancement method. Future studies evaluating other outcomes of interest such as proximal adenomas and serrated lesions are warranted.

摘要

最近的研究评估了与高清(HD)结肠镜检查相比,智能电子分光技术(i-scan)在提高腺瘤检出率(ADR)方面的影响。我们旨在系统地回顾和分析这项技术的影响。对以下数据库进行了全面检索:PubMed/Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane和科学网。直接比较i-scan和HD结肠镜检查的全文随机对照试验(RCT)和队列研究被认为符合纳入标准。使用随机效应模型和DerSimonian-Laird方法汇总并比较二分结果。对于每个结果,生成相对风险(RR)、95%置信区间(CI)和P值。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。本分析共纳入五项研究,六个研究组。共有2620例患者(平均年龄58.6±7.2岁,女性比例44.8%)完成研究并纳入我们的分析。与HD结肠镜检查相比,任何一种i-scan的ADR均显著更高(RR:1.20,[CI:1.06-1.34],P=0.003)。亚组分析表明,仅使用表面和对比增强的i-scan的ADR显著更高(RR:1.25,[CI:1.07-1.47],P=0.004)。i-scan有潜力通过表面和对比增强方法提高ADR。未来有必要开展评估其他感兴趣结局(如近端腺瘤和锯齿状病变)的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69c0/9187364/c9551498ef75/10-1055-a-1794-0346-i2574ei1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验