• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腺瘤检出率的预测因素:内镜医师操作的视频研究

Predictive factors for adenoma detection rates: a video study of endoscopist practices.

作者信息

Yang Sun Young, Quan Susan Y, Friedland Shai, Pan Jennifer Y

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2021 Feb;9(2):E216-E223. doi: 10.1055/a-1321-0990. Epub 2021 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1055/a-1321-0990
PMID:33553584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7857972/
Abstract

In 2015, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) Task Force on Quality in Endoscopy deemed adenoma detection rate (ADR) the most important quality measure for colonoscopy. There has been much interest in factors that can increase ADR. To date, however, few studies have looked at what intra-procedural endoscopist practices are associated with improving ADR. We conducted a retrospective review of colonoscopy videos to evaluate intra-procedural practices that could be associated with ADR.  Videos were recorded of colonoscopies performed between September and December 2017 at the Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Colonoscopies for screening and surveillance were included for video review. Factors assessed included withdrawal time, intra-procedural cleaning, inspection technique, and other variables (colon distention, removal of equivocal/hyperplastic polyps). A series of multiple regression analyses was conducted on variables of interest before running a final model of significant predictors.  A total of 130 videos were reviewed from nine endoscopists whose ADRs ranged between 37.5 % and 73.7 %. The final regression model was significant (F = 15.35, df = 2,  = 0.0044), R  = 0.8365) with close inspection of behind folds and quality of cecal inspection being the factors highly correlated with predicting ADR. Withdrawal and inspection times, colonic wall distention, removal of equivocal/hyperplastic polyps, quality of rectal inspection, suctioning, and washing were factors moderately correlated with predicting ADR.  We found that behind-fold inspection and a meticulous cecal inspection technique were predictive of a high ADR.

摘要

2015年,美国胃肠内镜学会(ASGE)和美国胃肠病学会(ACG)内镜质量特别工作组将腺瘤检出率(ADR)视为结肠镜检查最重要的质量指标。人们对可提高ADR的因素颇感兴趣。然而,迄今为止,很少有研究探讨术中内镜医师的哪些操作与ADR的改善相关。我们对结肠镜检查视频进行了回顾性分析,以评估可能与ADR相关的术中操作。 视频记录了2017年9月至12月在帕洛阿尔托退伍军人事务医疗保健系统进行的结肠镜检查。纳入用于视频回顾的筛查和监测结肠镜检查。评估的因素包括退镜时间、术中清洁、检查技术以及其他变量(结肠扩张、切除可疑/增生性息肉)。在运行最终的显著预测因子模型之前,对感兴趣的变量进行了一系列多元回归分析。 共回顾了来自9位内镜医师的130个视频,他们的ADR在37.5%至73.7%之间。最终回归模型具有显著性(F = 15.35,df = 2, = 0.0044),R = 0.8365),对皱襞后方的仔细检查和盲肠检查质量是与预测ADR高度相关的因素。退镜和检查时间、结肠壁扩张、切除可疑/增生性息肉、直肠检查质量、吸引和冲洗是与预测ADR中度相关的因素。 我们发现,对皱襞后方的检查和细致的盲肠检查技术可预测高ADR。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/228a/7857972/85a7ba56bd44/10-1055-a-1321-0990-i2015ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/228a/7857972/e1a1d9bcd469/10-1055-a-1321-0990-i2015ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/228a/7857972/9630033ebdf7/10-1055-a-1321-0990-i2015ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/228a/7857972/85a7ba56bd44/10-1055-a-1321-0990-i2015ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/228a/7857972/e1a1d9bcd469/10-1055-a-1321-0990-i2015ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/228a/7857972/9630033ebdf7/10-1055-a-1321-0990-i2015ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/228a/7857972/85a7ba56bd44/10-1055-a-1321-0990-i2015ei3.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictive factors for adenoma detection rates: a video study of endoscopist practices.腺瘤检出率的预测因素:内镜医师操作的视频研究
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Feb;9(2):E216-E223. doi: 10.1055/a-1321-0990. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
2
The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.南非威特沃特斯兰德大学唐纳德·戈登医学中心结肠镜检查的“内幕”:门诊内镜科室的实践审核。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Nov 27;110(12):1186-1190. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i12.14419.
3
Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).结肠镜退镜技术质量与腺瘤检出率的变化(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
4
The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate.除腺瘤检出率外的次要质量指标可提高腺瘤漏检率预测能力。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 May;111(5):723-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.440. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
5
Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.息肉大小标注海报提高了内镜医生在大型社区实践中的息肉测量准确性,但对腺瘤检出率没有影响。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep;17(10):2034-2041. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
6
Video-Based Assessments of Colonoscopy Inspection Quality Correlate With Quality Metrics and Highlight Areas for Improvement.基于视频的结肠镜检查质量评估与质量指标相关,并突出了需要改进的领域。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;17(4):691-700. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.060. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
7
The Goalposts Have Moved: Can Surgery Residents Meet Updated Quality Benchmarks for Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy?目标已变:外科住院医师能否达到结肠镜检查腺瘤检出率的最新质量基准?
Am Surg. 2016 Sep;82(9):835-8.
8
Polypectomy rate: a surrogate for adenoma detection rate varies by colon segment, gender, and endoscopist.息肉切除术率:腺瘤检出率的替代指标因结肠节段、性别和内镜医师而异。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jul;12(7):1137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.11.023. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
9
Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.提供锯齿状息肉检出率基准数据:新罕布什尔结肠镜检查登记处的分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1188-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
10
Factors Associated with Surveillance Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.与监测腺瘤和锯齿状息肉检出率相关的因素。
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Dec;62(12):3579-3585. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4792-7. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Automatic Quality Control System and Adenoma Detection Rates During Routine Colonoscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.常规结肠镜检查期间的自动质量控制系统与腺瘤检出率:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2457241. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57241.
2
Establishment and evaluation of a nomogram predicting risks of missed diagnoses of colorectal polyps.建立并评估一种预测结直肠息肉漏诊风险的列线图。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02415-6.
3
Does i-scan improve adenoma detection rate compared to high-definition colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
State of the Science on Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and How to Achieve Them.结直肠镜检查质量指标现状及达成方法。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug;115(8):1183-1190. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000622.
2
A prospective RCT comparing combined chromoendoscopy with water exchange (CWE) vs water exchange (WE) vs air insufflation (AI) in adenoma detection in screening colonoscopy.一项前瞻性 RCT 比较了联合染色内镜与水交换(CWE)、水交换(WE)和空气注入(AI)在筛查结肠镜检查中腺瘤检测中的效果。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 May;7(4):477-487. doi: 10.1177/2050640619832196. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
3
Quality assurance of computer-aided detection and diagnosis in colonoscopy.
与高清结肠镜检查相比,智能电子分光技术(i-scan)是否能提高腺瘤检出率?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Jun 10;10(6):E824-E831. doi: 10.1055/a-1794-0346. eCollection 2022 Jun.
结肠镜中计算机辅助检测和诊断的质量保证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jul;90(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
4
Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO: a randomized controlled trial using a tandem colonoscopy approach.对比水下全结肠镜与标准 CO 检查的腺瘤和息肉遗漏率:使用串联结肠镜方法的随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):591-598. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.046. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
5
Defining adenoma detection rate benchmarks in average-risk male veterans.定义平均风险男性退伍军人中腺瘤检出率的基准。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jan;89(1):137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
6
Is the level of cleanliness using segmental Boston bowel preparation scale associated with a higher adenoma detection rate?使用分段波士顿肠道准备量表的清洁程度是否与更高的腺瘤检出率相关?
Ann Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar-Apr;31(2):217-223. doi: 10.20524/aog.2018.0231. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
How to Improve Your Adenoma Detection Rate During Colonoscopy.如何在结肠镜检查中提高腺瘤检出率
Gastroenterology. 2016 Dec;151(6):1054-1057. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
8
Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme.分剂量准备用于结肠镜检查可提高腺瘤检出率:一项在有组织筛查计划中的随机对照试验。
Gut. 2017 Feb;66(2):270-277. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310685. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
9
Longer Withdrawal Time Is Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Interval Cancer After Screening Colonoscopy.筛查结肠镜检查后,较长的撤镜时间与间隔期癌症发生率降低相关。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Oct;149(4):952-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.06.044. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
10
Position change during colonoscope withdrawal increases polyp and adenoma detection in the right but not in the left side of the colon: results of a randomized controlled trial.结肠镜退镜过程中改变体位可增加结肠右侧而非左侧息肉和腺瘤的检出率:一项随机对照试验的结果
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):488-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.035. Epub 2015 Apr 22.