Teo Thomas
Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:861584. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.861584. eCollection 2022.
guides the analysis of the of a in psychological science, the consequences for the study of race, and how scientific racism has been possible in the pursuit of knowledge. The article argues that race has not only been misused in the politics of psychology but misappropriated because of the of psychological science. The epistemic process is divided into four components to argue that naïve empiricist approaches in psychology, centered on scientific method, prevent an intricate understanding of race. Reasons for privileging method in psychology and the consequences of a are discussed, including a narrow epistemic horizon and an inability to account for the temporality and contextuality of psychological phenomena. Ignorance, failure, or unwillingness to account for epistemic complexity when studying race are identified as problems. Questions about who benefits from narrow epistemologies are answered and suggestions for a broader practice of knowledge and education are provided.
指导对心理科学中一个[未提及具体内容]的分析、种族研究的后果以及在追求知识过程中科学种族主义如何成为可能。文章认为，种族不仅在心理学政治中被滥用，而且由于心理科学的[未提及具体内容]而被挪用。认知过程分为四个部分，以论证心理学中以科学方法为中心的天真经验主义方法阻碍了对种族的深入理解。讨论了心理学中优先考虑方法的原因以及[未提及具体内容]的后果，包括狭隘的认知视野以及无法解释心理现象的时间性和情境性。在研究种族时忽视、未能或不愿意考虑认知复杂性被确定为问题。回答了关于谁从狭隘认识论中受益的问题，并提供了关于更广泛的知识和教育实践的建议。
