Jaubert Maxime, Le Baron Marie, Jacquet Christophe, Couvreur Antoine, Fabre-Aubrespy Maxime, Flecher Xavier, Ollivier Matthieu, Argenson Jean-Noel
Institute for Locomotion, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Northern Hospital, Marseille, France.
Institute for Locomotion, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology ISM, CNRS, Aix-Marseille University, St. Marguerite Hospital, Marseille, France.
Bone Jt Open. 2022 Jun;3(6):485-494. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.36.BJO-2022-0024.R1.
Two-stage exchange revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed in case of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been considered for many years as being the gold standard for the treatment of chronic infection. However, over the past decade, there have been concerns about its safety and its effectiveness. The purposes of our study were to investigate our practice, collecting the overall spacer complications, and then to analyze their risk factors.
We retrospectively included 125 patients with chronic hip PJI who underwent a staged THA revision performed between January 2013 and December 2019. All spacer complications were systematically collected, and risk factors were analyzed. Statistical evaluations were performed using the Student's -test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher's exact test.
Our staged exchange practice shows poor results, which means a 42% mechanical spacer failure rate, and a 20% recurrent infection rate over the two years average follow-up period. Moreover, we found a high rate of spacer dislocation (23%) and a low rate of spacer fracture (8%) compared to the previous literature. Our findings stress that the majority of spacer complications and failures is reflecting a population with high comorbid burden, highlighted by the American Society of Anesthesiology grade, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Lee score associations, as well as the cardiac, pulmonary, kidney, or hepatic chronic conditions.
Our experience of a two-stage hip exchange revision noted important complication rates associated with high failure rates of polymethylmethacrylate spacers. These findings must be interpreted in the light of the patient's comorbidity profiles, as the elective population for staged exchange has an increasing comorbid burden leading to poor results. In order to provide better results for this specific population, our conclusion suggests that comparative strategy studies are required to improve our therapeutic indication. Cite this article: 2022;3(6):485-494.
多年来,两阶段翻修全髋关节置换术(THA)一直被视为治疗假体周围关节感染(PJI)的金标准。然而,在过去十年中,人们对其安全性和有效性产生了担忧。我们研究的目的是调查我们的实践情况,收集总的间隔物并发症,然后分析其危险因素。
我们回顾性纳入了2013年1月至2019年12月期间接受分期THA翻修术的125例慢性髋关节PJI患者。系统收集所有间隔物并发症,并分析危险因素。使用学生t检验、曼-惠特尼U检验和费舍尔精确检验进行统计学评估。
我们的分期翻修实践结果不佳,这意味着在平均两年的随访期内,机械性间隔物失败率为42%,再感染率为20%。此外,与以往文献相比,我们发现间隔物脱位率较高(23%),间隔物骨折率较低(8%)。我们的研究结果强调,大多数间隔物并发症和失败反映了一个合并症负担较高的人群,美国麻醉医师协会分级、查尔森合并症指数和李评分关联以及心脏、肺部、肾脏或肝脏慢性疾病突出了这一点。
我们两阶段髋关节翻修术的经验表明,与聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯间隔物的高失败率相关的并发症发生率很高。这些发现必须根据患者的合并症情况来解释,因为分期翻修的选择性人群合并症负担不断增加,导致结果不佳。为了给这一特定人群提供更好的结果,我们的结论表明需要进行比较策略研究以改善我们的治疗指征。引用本文:2022;3(6):485-494。