Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, lägg till a Sweden.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Scand J Rheumatol. 2023 Jul;52(4):364-373. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2022.2064183. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
To study the agreement between clinical axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) diagnoses and fulfilment of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) axSpA and modified New York (mNY) classification criteria, and to compare disease/health status between axSpA subtypes.
Patients with prevalent, clinical axSpA attending a rheumatology clinic were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Assessments included physical evaluation, laboratory testing, questionnaires, and appropriate imaging, allowing classification. Standard axSpA outcome measures were compared between patients fulfilling mNY/radiographic versus non-radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA/nr-axSpA) criteria.
Of 239 consecutively included patients, 141 fulfilled ASAS r-axSpA and/or mNY criteria, while 57 fulfilled nr-axSpA criteria. The agreement between r-axSpA and mNY criteria fulfilment was 94%. The positive predictive value (PPV) of a clinical ankylosing spondylitis (AS) diagnosis for mNY criteria fulfilment was 71%; the PPV of an undifferentiated axSpA (u-axSpA) diagnosis for fulfilment of nr-axSpA criteria was 30% and 40% for mNY criteria. Patients with r-axSpA/AS were older, more often men, and had longer disease duration, more uveitis, and worse spinal mobility than nr-axSpA patients, who had more enthesitis and dactylitis.
We found an overall good concordance between clinical axSpA diagnoses and classification criteria fulfilment, with 83% fulfilling ASAS axSpA and/or mNY criteria. Regarding axSpA subtypes, the concordance was weaker, and although the ICD-10 code for AS correctly identified patients meeting mNY criteria in 71% of cases, one-third of mNY-positive patients lacked an AS diagnosis. Moreover, clinical u-axSpA diagnoses could not serve as a proxy to identify nr-axSpA, highlighting the importance of thorough classification in research on axSpA subtypes.
研究临床中轴型脊柱关节炎(axSpA)诊断与满足评估强直性脊柱炎国际协会(ASAS)axSpA 标准和改良纽约(mNY)分类标准之间的一致性,并比较 axSpA 亚型之间的疾病/健康状况。
本横断面研究纳入了在风湿病诊所就诊的现患、临床中轴型 SpA 患者。评估包括体格检查、实验室检查、问卷调查和适当的影像学检查,以进行分类。比较符合 mNY/影像学 axSpA(r-axSpA/nr-axSpA)标准与不符合 r-axSpA/nr-axSpA 标准的患者的标准 axSpA 结局指标。
在连续纳入的 239 例患者中,141 例符合 ASAS r-axSpA 和/或 mNY 标准,57 例符合 nr-axSpA 标准。r-axSpA 与 mNY 标准符合的一致性为 94%。临床强直性脊柱炎(AS)诊断符合 mNY 标准的阳性预测值(PPV)为 71%;未分化 axSpA(u-axSpA)诊断符合 nr-axSpA 标准的 PPV 为 30%和 40%,符合 mNY 标准的 PPV 为 30%和 40%。r-axSpA/AS 患者年龄较大,男性更多,疾病持续时间更长,虹膜炎更多,脊柱活动度更差,而 nr-axSpA 患者附着点炎和指(趾)炎更多。
我们发现临床 axSpA 诊断与分类标准符合的总体一致性较好,符合 ASAS axSpA 和/或 mNY 标准的患者占 83%。关于 axSpA 亚型,一致性较弱,虽然 AS 的 ICD-10 编码正确识别出符合 mNY 标准的患者在 71%的病例中,但三分之一的 mNY 阳性患者没有 AS 诊断。此外,临床 u-axSpA 诊断不能作为识别 nr-axSpA 的替代指标,这突出了在 axSpA 亚型研究中进行彻底分类的重要性。