• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年工作和社会适应量表:教师版的心理测量特性及心理社会障碍的情境可变性证据。

The Work and Social Adjustment Scale for Youth: Psychometric properties of the teacher version and evidence of contextual variability in psychosocial impairments.

机构信息

Comprehensive Assessment and Intervention Program.

Department of Educational Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2022 Aug;34(8):777-790. doi: 10.1037/pas0001139. Epub 2022 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1037/pas0001139
PMID:35696188
Abstract

Effective mental health services require accurate assessment of psychosocial impairments linked to mental health concerns. Youth who experience these impairments do so within and across various contexts (e.g., school, home). Youth may display symptoms of mental health concerns without co-occurring impairments, and vice versa. Yet, nearly all impairment measures presume that those assessed display mental health concerns. Consequently, we recently developed youth and parent versions of a five-item measure of youth psychosocial impairments (i.e., Work and Social Adjustment Scale for Youth [WSASY]), structured to assess any youth, regardless of mental health status. Across two studies, we developed and tested a WSASY teacher version, in a large sample of 382 student teacher reports (Study 1), and a subsample of 66 youth who, along with their parents and teachers, completed the WSASY and a series of school- and home-based behavioral tasks (Study 2). In Study 1, WSASY teacher reports demonstrated excellent internal consistency and unique relations with teacher reports on well-established measures of psychosocial strengths and difficulties. In Study 2, teacher, youth, and parent WSASY reports demonstrated low correspondence with each other and context-specific relations with criterion variables. This low correspondence allowed us to capitalize on an integrative approach designed to optimize informant-specific variance. Integrative scores demonstrated robust, large-magnitude relations with criterion variables across multiple information sources. These findings provide important psychometric support for use of WSASY teacher reports, and pave the way toward integrating WSASY reports from multiple informants who observe youth psychosocial impairments within different contexts and from different perspectives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

有效的心理健康服务需要准确评估与心理健康问题相关的心理社会障碍。有这些障碍的年轻人会在各种环境中(例如,学校、家庭)经历这些障碍。年轻人可能会表现出心理健康问题的症状,而没有同时出现障碍,反之亦然。然而,几乎所有的障碍评估都假定被评估者存在心理健康问题。因此,我们最近开发了一种五项目的青少年心理社会障碍评估量表(即青少年工作和社会适应量表[WSASY])的青少年和家长版本,该量表旨在评估任何青少年,无论其心理健康状况如何。在两项研究中,我们在一个由 382 名学生教师报告组成的大样本中(研究 1)和一个由 66 名青少年组成的子样本中(研究 2),开发并测试了 WSASY 教师版本。在研究 1 中,WSASY 教师报告显示出极好的内部一致性,并与教师对心理社会优势和困难的既定测量工具的报告具有独特的关系。在研究 2 中,教师、青少年和家长的 WSASY 报告彼此之间的相关性较低,与标准变量的相关性具有特定情境的特点。这种低相关性使我们能够利用一种综合方法,旨在优化特定信息提供者的方差。综合评分与来自多个信息来源的标准变量之间表现出稳健的、大效应量的关系。这些发现为使用 WSASY 教师报告提供了重要的心理计量学支持,并为整合来自多个信息提供者的 WSASY 报告铺平了道路,这些信息提供者在不同情境和从不同角度观察青少年的心理社会障碍。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale for Youth: Psychometric properties of the teacher version and evidence of contextual variability in psychosocial impairments.青少年工作和社会适应量表:教师版的心理测量特性及心理社会障碍的情境可变性证据。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Aug;34(8):777-790. doi: 10.1037/pas0001139. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
2
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale for Youth: A Measure for Assessing Youth Psychosocial Impairment Regardless of Mental Health Status.青少年工作与社会适应量表:一种用于评估青少年心理社会功能损害的工具,无论其心理健康状况如何。
J Child Fam Stud. 2019 Jan;28(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1238-6. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
3
Integrating multi-informant reports of youth mental health: A construct validation test of Kraemer and colleagues' (2003) Satellite Model.整合青少年心理健康的多渠道报告:对克雷默及其同事(2003年)卫星模型的结构效度检验
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 28;13:911629. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911629. eCollection 2022.
4
High school teacher ratings of academic, social, and behavioral difficulties: Factor structure and normative data for the School Functioning Scale.高中教师对学术、社交和行为困难的评价:学校功能量表的因子结构和规范数据。
Sch Psychol. 2019 Sep;34(5):479-491. doi: 10.1037/spq0000323. Epub 2019 May 2.
5
Parents' involvement and adolescents' school adjustment: Teacher-student relationships as a mechanism of change.家长参与和青少年的学校适应:师生关系作为变化的机制。
Sch Psychol. 2019 Jul;34(4):350-362. doi: 10.1037/spq0000288.
6
The Needs-to-Goals Gap: How informant discrepancies in youth mental health assessments impact service delivery.需求与目标差距:青少年心理健康评估中信息提供者的差异如何影响服务提供。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2022 Mar;92:102114. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102114. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
7
Psychometric properties of a parent- and teacher-report measure for autistic children: Parent-Teacher Relationship Quality Scale (PTRQS).一种针对自闭症儿童的家长和教师报告测量工具的心理测量特性:家长-教师关系质量量表(PTRQS)。
J Sch Psychol. 2022 Dec;95:25-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
8
Parent, Teacher, and Youth Reports on Measures of Reactive and Proactive Aggression.家长、教师和青少年关于反应性攻击和主动性攻击测量的报告。
Child Youth Care Forum. 2024 Aug;53(4):957-979. doi: 10.1007/s10566-023-09780-7. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
9
Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍的儿童和青少年的健康相关生活质量。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e541-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0844.
10
Parents' and teachers' ratings of family engagement: Congruence and prediction of outcomes.家长和教师对家庭参与度的评分:一致性及结果预测
Sch Psychol. 2021 May;36(3):142-154. doi: 10.1037/spq0000379.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-Informant Ratings of Childhood Limited Prosocial Emotions: Mother, Father, and Teacher Perspectives.多 informant 对儿童有限亲社会情绪的评价:母亲、父亲和教师的观点。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2023 Jan-Feb;52(1):119-133. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2151452. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
2
Conceptual, methodological, and measurement factors that disqualify use of measurement invariance techniques to detect informant discrepancies in youth mental health assessments.在青少年心理健康评估中,使测量不变性技术无法用于检测信息提供者差异的概念、方法和测量因素。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 2;13:931296. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.931296. eCollection 2022.
3
Integrating multi-informant reports of youth mental health: A construct validation test of Kraemer and colleagues' (2003) Satellite Model.
整合青少年心理健康的多渠道报告:对克雷默及其同事(2003年)卫星模型的结构效度检验
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 28;13:911629. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911629. eCollection 2022.