• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在直接竞争中,空间体验和群体大小对蚁群的价值。

The value of spatial experience and group size for ant colonies in direct competition.

机构信息

School of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Department of Geophysics, Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Insect Sci. 2023 Feb;30(1):241-250. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.13090. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1111/1744-7917.13090
PMID:35696548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10084317/
Abstract

Animals often search for food more efficiently with experience. However, the contribution of experience to foraging success under direct competition has rarely been examined. Here we used colonies of an individually foraging desert ant to investigate the value of spatial experience. First, we trained worker groups of equal numbers to solve either a complex or a simple maze. We then tested pairs of both groups against one another in reaching a food reward. This task required solving the same complex maze that one of the groups had been trained in, to determine which group would exploit better the food reward. The worker groups previously trained in the complex mazes reached the food reward faster and more of these workers fed on the food than those trained in simple mazes, but only in the intermediate size group. To determine the relative importance of group size versus spatial experience in exploiting food patches, we then tested smaller trained worker groups against larger untrained ones. The larger groups outcompeted the smaller ones, despite the latter's advantage of spatial experience. The contribution of spatial experience, as found here, appears to be small, and depends on group size: an advantage of a few workers of the untrained group over the trained group negates its benefits.

摘要

动物通常通过经验更有效地寻找食物。然而,经验对直接竞争下觅食成功的贡献很少被检验。在这里,我们使用单个觅食的沙漠蚂蚁的殖民地来研究空间经验的价值。首先,我们训练数量相等的工蚁群体来解决复杂或简单的迷宫。然后,我们在到达食物奖励的过程中测试两组之间的配对。这个任务要求解决其中一个群体接受过训练的复杂迷宫,以确定哪个群体能更好地利用食物奖励。以前在复杂迷宫中受过训练的工蚁群体更快地到达了食物奖励,并且比那些在简单迷宫中受过训练的工蚁群体更多地食用了食物,但这只发生在中等大小的群体中。为了确定在利用食物斑块方面,群体大小与空间经验的相对重要性,我们随后测试了较小的受过训练的工蚁群体与较大的未受过训练的群体之间的对抗。尽管后者具有空间经验的优势,但较大的群体还是战胜了较小的群体。如这里所发现的,空间经验的贡献似乎很小,并且取决于群体大小:未受过训练的群体中少数工蚁的优势可以抵消其益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/378b/10084317/2eaf68875b54/INS-30-241-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/378b/10084317/edc386996021/INS-30-241-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/378b/10084317/e239b3b46dcb/INS-30-241-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/378b/10084317/2eaf68875b54/INS-30-241-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/378b/10084317/edc386996021/INS-30-241-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/378b/10084317/e239b3b46dcb/INS-30-241-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/378b/10084317/2eaf68875b54/INS-30-241-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The value of spatial experience and group size for ant colonies in direct competition.在直接竞争中,空间体验和群体大小对蚁群的价值。
Insect Sci. 2023 Feb;30(1):241-250. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.13090. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
2
The interplay between maze complexity, colony size, learning and memory in ants while solving a maze: A test at the colony level.蚂蚁在解决迷宫问题时,迷宫复杂性、蚁群规模、学习与记忆之间的相互作用:蚁群层面的一项测试。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0183753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183753. eCollection 2017.
3
The effect of maze complexity on maze-solving time in a desert ant.迷宫复杂度对沙漠蚂蚁解决迷宫问题所需时间的影响。
Behav Processes. 2019 Sep;166:103893. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103893. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
4
Non-spatial information on the presence of food elevates search intensity in ant workers, leading to faster maze solving in a process parallel to spatial learning.食物存在的非空间信息会提高蚂蚁工人的搜索强度,从而在与空间学习并行的过程中更快地解决迷津。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 28;15(2):e0229709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229709. eCollection 2020.
5
The combined role of visual and olfactory cues in foraging by ants in laboratory mazes.视觉和嗅觉线索在实验室迷宫中蚂蚁觅食行为中的联合作用。
Curr Zool. 2022 Aug 5;69(4):401-408. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoac058. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Evidence for the effect of brief exposure to food, but not learning interference, on maze solving in desert ants.食物短暂暴露对沙漠蚂蚁走迷宫的影响的证据,但不是学习干扰。
Integr Zool. 2022 Sep;17(5):704-714. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12622. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
7
The organization of foraging in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta.火蚁,即不被征服的红火蚁的觅食组织。
J Insect Sci. 2011;11:26. doi: 10.1673/031.011.0126.
8
Desert Ants Learn to Avoid Pitfall Traps While Foraging.沙漠蚂蚁在觅食时学会避开陷阱。
Biology (Basel). 2022 Jun 10;11(6):897. doi: 10.3390/biology11060897.
9
Foraging arena size and structural complexity affect the dynamics of food distribution in ant colonies.觅食区域的大小和结构复杂性会影响蚁群中食物分配的动态变化。
Environ Entomol. 2010 Dec;39(6):1936-42. doi: 10.1603/EN10148.
10
Biomarkers in a socially exchanged /fluid reflect colony maturity, behavior, and distributed metabolism.生物标志物在社会交换/流动的环境中反映着群体的成熟度、行为和分布式代谢。
Elife. 2021 Nov 2;10:e74005. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74005.

引用本文的文献

1
Egg-Laying Behavior of Ants Is Influenced More Strongly by Temperature Than Daylength.蚂蚁的产卵行为受温度的影响比受日照长度的影响更强。
Biology (Basel). 2022 Nov 25;11(12):1714. doi: 10.3390/biology11121714.

本文引用的文献

1
Leg or antenna injury in ants impairs survival but does not hinder searching for food.蚂蚁的腿部或触角受伤会影响其生存,但不会妨碍它们寻找食物。
Curr Zool. 2021 Mar 15;68(4):441-450. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoab027. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Evidence for the effect of brief exposure to food, but not learning interference, on maze solving in desert ants.食物短暂暴露对沙漠蚂蚁走迷宫的影响的证据,但不是学习干扰。
Integr Zool. 2022 Sep;17(5):704-714. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12622. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
3
Non-spatial information on the presence of food elevates search intensity in ant workers, leading to faster maze solving in a process parallel to spatial learning.
食物存在的非空间信息会提高蚂蚁工人的搜索强度,从而在与空间学习并行的过程中更快地解决迷津。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 28;15(2):e0229709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229709. eCollection 2020.
4
Bumblebees learn foraging routes through exploitation-exploration cycles.大黄蜂通过利用-探索循环来学习觅食路线。
J R Soc Interface. 2019 Jul 26;16(156):20190103. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0103. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
5
The effect of maze complexity on maze-solving time in a desert ant.迷宫复杂度对沙漠蚂蚁解决迷宫问题所需时间的影响。
Behav Processes. 2019 Sep;166:103893. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103893. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
6
Consistent differences in foraging behavior in 2 sympatric harvester ant species may facilitate coexistence.两种同域分布的收获蚁物种在觅食行为上的持续差异可能有助于它们共存。
Curr Zool. 2018 Oct;64(5):653-661. doi: 10.1093/cz/zox054. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
7
Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition.植物群落中的竞争与共存:种内竞争比种间竞争更强。
Ecol Lett. 2018 Sep;21(9):1319-1329. doi: 10.1111/ele.13098. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
8
How ecology shapes exploitation: a framework to predict the behavioural response of human and animal foragers along exploration-exploitation trade-offs.生态如何塑造开发:预测人类和动物觅食者在探索-开发权衡中行为反应的框架。
Ecol Lett. 2018 Jun;21(6):779-793. doi: 10.1111/ele.12949. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
9
The interplay between maze complexity, colony size, learning and memory in ants while solving a maze: A test at the colony level.蚂蚁在解决迷宫问题时,迷宫复杂性、蚁群规模、学习与记忆之间的相互作用:蚁群层面的一项测试。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0183753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183753. eCollection 2017.
10
Effects of recent experience on foraging decisions by bumble bees.近期经历对大黄蜂觅食决策的影响。
Oecologia. 1993 May;94(2):244-246. doi: 10.1007/BF00341323.