Suppr超能文献

健康人群压力疼痛阈值的个体影响因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Personal influencing factors for pressure pain threshold in healthy people: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium; Research School CAPHRI, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM), the Netherlands.

Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM), the Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Aug;139:104727. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104727. Epub 2022 Jun 11.

Abstract

All studies that investigated personal factors influencing pressure pain threshold (PPT) in healthy people were synthesized. Data was summarized, and risk of bias (RoB) and level of evidence were determined. Results were pooled per influencing factor, grouped by body region and included in meta-analyses. Fifty-four studies were eligible. Five had low, nine moderate, and 40 high RoB. Following meta-analyses, a strong conclusion was found for the influence of scapular position, a moderate for the influence of gender, and a weak for the influence of age (shoulder/arm region) and blood pressure on PPT. In addition, body mass index, gender (leg region), alcohol consumption and pain vigilance may not influence PPT. Based on qualitative summary, depression and menopause may not influence PPT. For other variables there was only preliminary or conflicting evidence. However, caution is advised, since the majority of included studies showed a high RoB and several were not eligible to include in meta-analyses. Heterogeneity was high in the performed meta-analyses, and most conclusions were weak. More standardized research is necessary.

摘要

所有研究健康人群中影响压力疼痛阈值(PPT)的个体因素的研究都进行了综合分析。总结了数据,并确定了偏倚风险(RoB)和证据水平。根据影响因素对结果进行了汇总,按身体部位分组,并纳入了荟萃分析。有 54 项研究符合条件。其中 5 项研究的 RoB 较低,9 项研究的 RoB 为中等,40 项研究的 RoB 较高。荟萃分析后,发现肩胛位置对 PPT 的影响很强,性别对 PPT 的影响为中等,年龄(肩部/手臂区域)和血压对 PPT 的影响较弱。此外,体重指数、性别(腿部区域)、酒精摄入和疼痛警觉性可能不会影响 PPT。基于定性总结,抑郁和更年期可能不会影响 PPT。对于其他变量,只有初步的或相互矛盾的证据。然而,需要谨慎,因为大多数纳入的研究都显示出较高的 RoB,并且有几项研究不符合纳入荟萃分析的条件。进行的荟萃分析中存在高度的异质性,并且大多数结论都较弱。需要进行更标准化的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验