Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Research School CAPHRI, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Clin J Pain. 2024 Oct 1;40(10):563-577. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001234.
This study aimed to apply the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) grading system for identifying nociplastic pain in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) awaiting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and propose criteria to fine-tune decision-making. In addition, the study aimed to characterize a "probable" versus "no or possible" nociplastic pain mechanism using biopsychosocial variables and compare both groups in their 1-year post-TKA response.
A secondary analysis of baseline data of a longitudinal prospective study involving 197 patients with KOA awaiting total TKA in Belgium and the Netherlands was performed. Two approaches, one considering 4 and the other 3 pain locations (step 2 of the grading system), were presented. Linear mixed model analyses were performed to compare the probable and no or possible nociplastic pain mechanism groups for several preoperative biopsychosocial-related variables and 1-year postoperative pain. Also, a sensitivity analysis, comparing 3 pain mechanism groups, was performed.
Thirty (15.22%-approach 4 pain locations) and 46 (23.35%-approach 3 pain locations) participants were categorized under probable nociplastic pain. Irrespective of the pain location approach or sensitivity analysis, the probable nociplastic pain group included more woman, was younger, exhibited worse results on various preoperative pain-related and psychological variables, and had more pain 1-year post-TKA compared with the other group.
This study proposed additional criteria to fine-tune the grading system for nociplastic pain (except for discrete/regional/multifocal/widespread pain) and characterized a subgroup of patients with KOA with probable nociplastic pain. Future research is warranted for further validation.
本研究旨在应用国际疼痛研究协会(IASP)分级系统识别等待全膝关节置换术(TKA)的膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者的神经病理性疼痛,并提出细化决策的标准。此外,本研究旨在使用生物心理社会变量来描述“可能”与“无或可能”神经病理性疼痛机制,并比较两组患者 TKA 后 1 年的反应。
对在比利时和荷兰进行的一项涉及 197 例 KOA 患者的前瞻性纵向研究的基线数据进行二次分析。提出了两种方法,一种考虑了 4 个疼痛部位,另一种考虑了 3 个疼痛部位(分级系统的第 2 步)。采用线性混合模型分析比较可能的神经病理性疼痛机制组和无或可能的神经病理性疼痛机制组的几个术前生物心理社会相关变量和 1 年后的疼痛。还进行了敏感性分析,比较了 3 个疼痛机制组。
30 名(4 个疼痛部位方法,15.22%)和 46 名(3 个疼痛部位方法,23.35%)患者被归类为可能的神经病理性疼痛。无论疼痛部位方法或敏感性分析如何,可能的神经病理性疼痛组女性比例更高,年龄更小,各种术前疼痛相关和心理变量的结果更差,并且 TKA 后 1 年疼痛更严重。
本研究提出了细化神经病理性疼痛分级系统的额外标准(除了离散/区域性/多灶性/广泛性疼痛),并描述了 KOA 患者中可能存在神经病理性疼痛的亚组。需要进一步验证。