• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整合法医精神病患者暴力风险评估中的静态和可修正风险因素:FoVOx 的可行性研究。

Integrating static and modifiable risk factors in violence risk assessment for forensic psychiatric patients: a feasibility study of FoVOx.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

The Oxford Clinic, Littlemore Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Nord J Psychiatry. 2023 Apr;77(3):240-246. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2022.2084158. Epub 2022 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1080/08039488.2022.2084158
PMID:35697296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10108825/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Risk assessment is integral to forensic psychiatry. Previous work has highlighted the benefits of using scalable and evidence-based actuarial risk tools developed within forensic populations, such as the online Forensic Psychiatry and Violence Oxford (FoVOx) violence risk assessment tool. We examined the feasibility of using FoVOx in a Swedish forensic cohort and tested whether adding modifiable (dynamic) factors would increase its useability to clinicians.

METHODS

We completed FoVOx assessments on all patients discharged from forensic psychiatric hospitals in Stockholm County, Sweden, between 2012 and 2017 and investigated recidivism rates. In addition, interviews were conducted with the clinicians responsible for each patient on the perceived accuracy, usefulness, and impact of FoVOx, which was examined using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Ninety-five discharges from forensic psychiatric hospitals were followed up. The median FoVOx score was a 7% likelihood of violent reoffending in two years after discharge. Six discharged patients (6%) were confirmed as violent recidivists using official records with a similar distribution of FoVOx risk categories as the rest of the sample. FoVOx was considered accurate by clinicians in more than half of cases, who suggested that modifiable risk factors could be added to increase acceptability. All clinicians thought that FoVOx was useful, and in 20% of discharges, it would have materially altered patient care. Overall, FoVOx was thought to impact decision-making and risk management, was practical to use, and could be completed without reference to written case material.

CONCLUSION

Completing FoVOx in forensic psychiatric hospitals can complement current approaches to clinical decision-making on violence risk assessment and management.

摘要

简介

风险评估是法医精神病学的重要组成部分。之前的工作强调了使用在法医人群中开发的可扩展和基于证据的评估工具(如在线法医精神病学和暴力牛津(FoVOx)暴力风险评估工具)的好处。我们考察了在瑞典法医队列中使用 FoVOx 的可行性,并测试了添加可修改(动态)因素是否会提高其对临床医生的可用性。

方法

我们对 2012 年至 2017 年间从斯德哥尔摩县瑞典法医精神病院出院的所有患者完成了 FoVOx 评估,并调查了累犯率。此外,我们对负责每位患者的临床医生进行了访谈,了解他们对 FoVOx 的准确性、有用性和影响的看法,使用主题分析对其进行了检验。

结果

对 95 名从法医精神病院出院的患者进行了随访。FoVOx 评分中位数为两年内再次发生暴力犯罪的可能性为 7%。使用官方记录确认了 6 名出院患者(6%)为暴力累犯,其 FoVOx 风险类别分布与样本其余部分相似。FoVOx 在超过一半的情况下被临床医生认为是准确的,他们建议可以添加可修改的风险因素来提高可接受性。所有临床医生都认为 FoVOx 有用,在 20%的出院患者中,它将极大地改变患者的护理。总体而言,FoVOx 被认为会影响决策和风险管理,使用起来很实用,并且无需参考书面病例材料即可完成。

结论

在法医精神病院中完成 FoVOx 可以补充当前在暴力风险评估和管理方面进行临床决策的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aec7/10108825/e6db181f90cf/IPSC_A_2084158_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aec7/10108825/e6db181f90cf/IPSC_A_2084158_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aec7/10108825/e6db181f90cf/IPSC_A_2084158_F0001_B.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrating static and modifiable risk factors in violence risk assessment for forensic psychiatric patients: a feasibility study of FoVOx.整合法医精神病患者暴力风险评估中的静态和可修正风险因素:FoVOx 的可行性研究。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2023 Apr;77(3):240-246. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2022.2084158. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
2
Assessment of violence risk in 440 psychiatric patients in China: examining the feasibility and acceptability of a novel and scalable approach (FoVOx).中国 440 名精神科患者暴力风险评估:新型可扩展方法(FoVOx)的可行性和可接受性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 2;21(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03115-3.
3
A Clinical Feasibility Study of the Forensic Psychiatry and Violence Oxford (FoVOx) Tool.法医精神病学与暴力牛津(FoVOx)工具的临床可行性研究
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 13;10:901. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00901. eCollection 2019.
4
Prediction of violent crime on discharge from secure psychiatric hospitals: A clinical prediction rule (FoVOx).从安全精神病院出院时暴力犯罪的预测:临床预测规则(FoVOx)。
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;47:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
5
The impact of confidence on the accuracy of structured professional and actuarial violence risk judgments in a sample of forensic psychiatric patients.在一组法医精神病患者样本中,信心对结构化专业和精算暴力风险判断准确性的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2003 Dec;27(6):573-87. doi: 10.1023/b:lahu.0000004887.50905.f7.
6
[Patients in forensic and general psychiatry. Do risk assessment measures detect differing risks of future violence?].[法医精神病学和普通精神病学中的患者。风险评估措施能否检测出未来暴力的不同风险?]
Nervenarzt. 2006 May;77(5):576-86. doi: 10.1007/s00115-005-1918-5.
7
Inpatient violence in forensic psychiatry: Does change in dynamic risk indicators of the IFTE help predict short term inpatient violence?法医精神病学中的住院患者暴力:国际暴力风险评估工具的动态风险指标变化是否有助于预测短期住院患者暴力?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Sep-Oct;66:101448. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
8
Applicability of two violence risk assessment tools in a psychiatric prison hospital population.两种暴力风险评估工具在精神病监狱医院人群中的适用性。
Behav Sci Law. 2020 Sep;38(5):471-481. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2474. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
9
Predictors of length of stay in forensic psychiatry: the influence of perceived risk of violence.法医精神病学住院时间的预测因素:暴力感知风险的影响。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Nov-Dec;37(6):635-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.038. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
10
European violence risk and mental disorders (EU-VIORMED): a multi-centre prospective cohort study protocol.欧洲暴力风险与精神障碍研究(EU-VIORMED):一项多中心前瞻性队列研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 19;19(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2379-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Duration of forensic psychiatric care and subsequent criminal recidivism in individuals sentenced in Sweden between 2009 and 2019.2009年至2019年期间在瑞典被判刑的个体中法医精神病护理的时长及随后的再次犯罪情况。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 14;14:1129993. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1129993. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The predictive performance of criminal risk assessment tools used at sentencing: Systematic review of validation studies.量刑时使用的犯罪风险评估工具的预测性能:验证研究的系统评价
J Crim Justice. 2022 Jul-Aug;81:101902. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101902.
2
Modifiable risk factors for inpatient violence in psychiatric hospital: prospective study and prediction model.精神科住院患者暴力的可修正风险因素:前瞻性研究和预测模型。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;53(2):590-596. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721002063. Epub 2021 May 24.
3
Associations between individual antipsychotics and the risk of arrests and convictions of violent and other crime: a nationwide within-individual study of 74 925 persons.
个体抗精神病药物与暴力及其他犯罪的逮捕和定罪风险之间的关联:一项对74925人的全国性个体内研究。
Psychol Med. 2021 Mar 11;52(16):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000556.
4
Assessment of violence risk in 440 psychiatric patients in China: examining the feasibility and acceptability of a novel and scalable approach (FoVOx).中国 440 名精神科患者暴力风险评估:新型可扩展方法(FoVOx)的可行性和可接受性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 2;21(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03115-3.
5
The HCR-20 and violence risk assessment - will a peak of inflated expectations turn to a trough of disillusionment?《HCR-20与暴力风险评估——过高期望的峰值会转向幻灭的低谷吗?》
BJPsych Bull. 2020 Dec;44(6):269-271. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2020.14.
6
Applicability of two violence risk assessment tools in a psychiatric prison hospital population.两种暴力风险评估工具在精神病监狱医院人群中的适用性。
Behav Sci Law. 2020 Sep;38(5):471-481. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2474. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
7
Mortality among male forensic and non-forensic psychiatric patients: matched cohort study of rates, predictors and causes-of-death.男性法医精神病患者和非法医精神病患者的死亡率:发病率、预测因素及死因的匹配队列研究
Nord J Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;74(7):489-496. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2020.1743753. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
8
Offense-Related Issues in Forensic Psychiatric Treatment: A Thematic Analysis.法医精神病治疗中与犯罪相关的问题:一项主题分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 8;10:925. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00925. eCollection 2019.
9
A Clinical Feasibility Study of the Forensic Psychiatry and Violence Oxford (FoVOx) Tool.法医精神病学与暴力牛津(FoVOx)工具的临床可行性研究
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 13;10:901. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00901. eCollection 2019.
10
Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics.校准:预测分析的阿喀琉斯之踵。
BMC Med. 2019 Dec 16;17(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1466-7.