National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
BMJ. 2022 Jun 13;377:e067085. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067085.
Management of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) centers on medication to prevent myocardial infarction and death. Many anti-anginal medications also have benefit for reducing symptoms, and have been proven to be effective against placebo control. Before effective preventive medications were available, patients with stable CAD often underwent revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), on the plausible assumption that these procedures would prevent adverse events and reduce symptoms. However, recent randomized controlled trials have cast doubt on these assumptions.Considering results from the recent ISCHEMIA trial, we discuss the evidence base that underpins revascularization for stable CAD in contemporary practice. We also focus on patient groups at high risk of myocardial infarction and death, for whom revascularization is often recommended. We outline the areas of uncertainty, unanswered research questions, and key areas of potential miscommunication in doctor-patient consultations.
稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的管理侧重于预防心肌梗死和死亡的药物治疗。许多抗心绞痛药物也有助于减轻症状,并已被证明对安慰剂对照有效。在有效的预防性药物可用之前,稳定型 CAD 患者通常接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的血运重建,其合理假设是这些程序将预防不良事件并减轻症状。然而,最近的随机对照试验对这些假设提出了质疑。
考虑到最近的 ISCHEMIA 试验的结果,我们讨论了支持当代稳定型 CAD 血运重建的循证医学基础。我们还关注心肌梗死和死亡风险较高的患者群体,这些患者通常被建议进行血运重建。我们概述了不确定性领域、未解决的研究问题以及医患咨询中潜在的沟通错误关键领域。