• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床医生注意力的概念和度量:范围综述方案。

Concepts and metrics of clinician attention: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA

College of Nursing, University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 13;12(6):e052334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052334.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052334
PMID:35697461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9196160/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is growing emphasis on the importance of both the cognitive and behavioural phenomenon of attention for clinicians engaged in patient care. Aspects of attention such as cognitive load, distraction and task switching have been studied in various settings with different methodologies. Using the protocol described here, we aim to systematically review the medical literature in order to map the concept of attention and to synthesise diverse concepts and methods under the broader category of research focused on 'attention'.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Following the methodology described by the Joanna Briggs Institute and Arksey and O'Malley, our scoping review conducts an iterative search of Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline (PubMed) and EMBASE (Ovid). An initial limited search based on key concepts and terminology will generate relevant articles which in turn will be mined for additional keywords and index terms to guide a formal literature search. Our multidisciplinary team will extract data into a matrix, including a small random sample of the same studies (to ensure concordance), and present the results in a descriptive narrative format.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As a secondary analysis, our study does not require ethics approval, and we will ensure that included studies have appropriate approval. We anticipate results will identify diverse ways of conceptualising clinician attention and will provide a foundation for developing additional metrics and study methods to optimise attention in the clinical environment. We will disseminate results through journals and conferences and coordinate with colleagues doing work in adjacent fields.

摘要

简介

越来越多的临床医生开始关注认知和行为注意力现象的重要性。在不同的环境中,使用不同的方法,已经研究了注意力的各个方面,如认知负荷、分心和任务切换。使用这里描述的方案,我们旨在系统地审查医学文献,以便绘制注意力的概念图,并将注意力集中在“注意力”这一广泛类别下的各种概念和方法进行综合。

方法和分析

根据 Joanna Briggs 研究所和 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的方法,我们的范围综述对 Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature(CINAHL)、Medline(PubMed)和 EMBASE(Ovid)进行迭代搜索。基于关键概念和术语的初步有限搜索将生成相关文章,这些文章反过来又将被挖掘出更多的关键字和索引词,以指导正式的文献搜索。我们的多学科团队将把数据提取到一个矩阵中,包括对相同研究的一个小随机样本(以确保一致性),并以描述性叙述格式呈现结果。

伦理和传播

作为二次分析,我们的研究不需要伦理批准,我们将确保所包括的研究具有适当的批准。我们预计结果将确定临床医生注意力的不同概念化方式,并为开发额外的指标和研究方法以优化临床环境中的注意力提供基础。我们将通过期刊和会议传播结果,并与相邻领域的同事协调。

相似文献

1
Concepts and metrics of clinician attention: a scoping review protocol.临床医生注意力的概念和度量:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 13;12(6):e052334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052334.
2
Inpatient clinician workload: a scoping review protocol to understand the definition, measurement and impact of non-procedural clinician workloads.住院临床医生工作量:一个范围综述方案,旨在了解非程序性临床医生工作量的定义、测量和影响。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 12;12(12):e062878. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062878.
3
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.
4
Scoping review protocol: what is the state of evidence for the use of communication apps with immigrant seniors in long-term care and community settings?范围综述方案:在长期护理和社区环境中,使用通讯应用程序与移民老年人沟通的证据状况如何?
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 21;14(8):e089939. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089939.
5
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.围产期大麻使用的危害减少:临床实践范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.
6
Educating hospital patients to prevent falls: protocol for a scoping review.教育住院患者预防跌倒:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):e030952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030952.
7
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
8
Virtual team-based care planning with older persons in formal care settings: a scoping review protocol.虚拟团队为正式照护环境中的老年人制定照护计划:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 16;11(11):e054900. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054900.
9
Indigenous perspectives on concepts and determinants of flourishing in a health and well-being context: a scoping review protocol.原住民视角下健康与幸福背景下繁荣的概念和决定因素:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 10;11(2):e045893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045893.
10
Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare worker support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a protocol for a scoping review.卫生组织发生患者安全事件后有效实施医护人员支持干预措施的关键因素:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):e061543. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061543.

引用本文的文献

1
Attention Among Health Care Professionals : A Scoping Review.医疗保健专业人员的关注度:一项范围综述
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Jul;177(7):941-952. doi: 10.7326/M23-3229. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward a Medical "Ecology of Attention".迈向医学“注意力生态学”。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 28;384(4):299-301. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2027190. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
2
Assessing the cognitive and work load of an inpatient safety dashboard in the context of opioid management.评估在阿片类药物管理背景下的住院患者安全仪表板的认知和工作负荷。
Appl Ergon. 2020 May;85:103047. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103047. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
3
Using Cognitive Load Theory to Improve Posthospitalization Follow-Up Visits.运用认知负荷理论改善出院后随访
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Aug;10(4):610-614. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694748. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
4
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
5
Task errors by emergency physicians are associated with interruptions, multitasking, fatigue and working memory capacity: a prospective, direct observation study.急诊医师的任务错误与中断、多任务处理、疲劳和工作记忆容量有关:一项前瞻性、直接观察研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Aug;27(8):655-663. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007333. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
6
Impact of Interruptions, Distractions, and Cognitive Load on Procedure Failures and Medication Administration Errors.干扰、分心及认知负荷对操作失败和用药错误的影响。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2017 Oct/Dec;32(4):309-317. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000256.
7
Improving our understanding of multi-tasking in healthcare: Drawing together the cognitive psychology and healthcare literature.增进我们对医疗保健中多任务处理的理解:整合认知心理学与医疗保健文献。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Mar;59(Pt A):45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.021. Epub 2016 Sep 11.
8
Aviation and healthcare: a comparative review with implications for patient safety.航空与医疗保健:对患者安全影响的比较性综述。
JRSM Open. 2015 Dec 2;7(1):2054270415616548. doi: 10.1177/2054270415616548. eCollection 2016 Jan.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
10
A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.综述的类型学:对14种综述类型及相关方法的分析。
Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.