• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

问题提示清单对乳腺癌患者的有效性:一项随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of question prompt lists in patients with breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Nursing, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Center for Nursing and Healthcare Research in Clinical Practice Application, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Graduate Institute of Information Management, National Taipei University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Sep;105(9):2984-2994. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.05.016. Epub 2022 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2022.05.016
PMID:35697559
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of a question prompt list (QPL) in decision self-efficacy, decision-making participation, patient-physician communication, decisional conflict or regret, and health status in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 240 patients with breast cancer were randomly assigned to a QPL group or control group (n = 120 each). The intervention and control groups received an additional educational QPL booklet and routine care, respectively.

RESULTS

The intervention group exhibited significant improvements in decision self-efficacy, perceived patient-physician interactions, and patient-physician communication compared with the control group. Multilevel modeling analyses revealed significant group-time interaction effects on decision self-efficacy (β = 9.99, P < 0.01), perceived patient-physician interactions (β = 8.10, P < 0.01), patient-physician communication (β = 5.02, P < 0.01), and anxiety status (β = -3.78, P < 0.05). The QPL intervention exerted more favorable effects than routine care, with repeated measurements of the same patients and the data of patients under the care of the same surgeons accounted for.

CONCLUSIONS

The QPL intervention exerted multidimensional effects on decision-making outcomes among patients with breast cancer.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Clinicians can integrate a QPL into routine care for patients with breast cancer.

摘要

目的

评估问题提示清单(QPL)在乳腺癌患者决策自我效能感、决策参与、医患沟通、决策冲突或后悔以及健康状况方面的有效性。

方法

将 240 名乳腺癌患者随机分为 QPL 组和对照组(每组 120 名)。干预组和对照组分别接受了额外的教育 QPL 小册子和常规护理。

结果

与对照组相比,干预组在决策自我效能感、感知医患互动和医患沟通方面均有显著改善。多层次模型分析显示,决策自我效能感(β=9.99,P<0.01)、感知医患互动(β=8.10,P<0.01)、医患沟通(β=5.02,P<0.01)和焦虑状况(β=-3.78,P<0.05)存在显著的组-时间交互效应。与常规护理相比,QPL 干预具有更有利的效果,考虑了同一患者的重复测量和同一外科医生护理下的患者数据。

结论

QPL 干预对乳腺癌患者的决策结果产生了多维影响。

实用意义

临床医生可以将 QPL 纳入乳腺癌患者的常规护理中。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of question prompt lists in patients with breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial.问题提示清单对乳腺癌患者的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Sep;105(9):2984-2994. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.05.016. Epub 2022 May 30.
2
Randomized trial of a question prompt list to increase patient active participation during interactions with black patients and their oncologists.一项关于问题提示列表的随机试验,旨在提高黑人患者与其肿瘤学家互动期间患者的积极参与度。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 May;100(5):818-826. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.026. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
3
Effectiveness of a Question Prompt List Intervention for Older Patients Considering Major Surgery: A Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial.针对考虑接受重大手术的老年患者的问题提示清单干预措施的有效性:一项多中心随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jan 1;155(1):6-13. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3778.
4
Navigating high-risk surgery: protocol for a multisite, stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial of a question prompt list intervention to empower older adults to ask questions that inform treatment decisions.应对高风险手术:一项多中心、阶梯式楔形、整群随机试验的方案,该试验采用问题提示列表干预措施,以促使老年人提出有助于治疗决策的问题。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 29;7(5):e014002. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014002.
5
The evaluation of a question prompt list for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in pediatric care: A pilot study.儿科护理中注意力缺陷/多动障碍问题提示清单的评估:一项试点研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Jan-Feb;13(1):172-186. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
6
Supporting doctor-patient communication: Providing a question prompt list and audio recording of the consultation as communication aids to outpatients in a cancer clinic.支持医患沟通:为癌症诊所的门诊患者提供问题提示清单和咨询录音作为沟通辅助工具。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Sep;101(9):1594-1600. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
7
The characteristics and effectiveness of Question Prompt List interventions in oncology: a systematic review of the literature.肿瘤学中问题提示清单干预措施的特点与效果:文献系统评价
Psychooncology. 2015 Mar;24(3):245-52. doi: 10.1002/pon.3637. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
8
Enhancing decision making about participation in cancer clinical trials: development of a question prompt list.提高癌症临床试验参与决策:问题提示清单的制定。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Aug;19(8):1227-38. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0942-6. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
9
Effects of a Patient Question Prompt List on Question Asking and Self-Efficacy During Outpatient Palliative Care Appointments.患者问题提示清单对门诊姑息治疗预约时提问和自我效能的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Apr;65(4):285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.12.010. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
10
Question Prompt List as a Communication Tool for Adults With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Incorporation of Patients' Perspectives.问题提示清单作为胃食管反流病成人的沟通工具:纳入患者观点。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 1;56(7):565-570. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001613. Epub 2021 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of question prompt list interventions for patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.问题提示清单干预措施对癌症患者的有效性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Jul 25;12:100765. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100765. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Evaluating the Health Literacy Characteristics of Question Prompt Lists on National Cancer Institute Designated Cancer Center Websites.评估美国国立癌症研究所指定癌症中心网站上问题提示列表的健康素养特征。
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02675-2.
3
Assessment of Appearance-related Questions About Breast Reconstruction Generated by Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer.
由聊天生成式预训练变换器生成的关于乳房重建的外貌相关问题评估
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Mar 21;13(3):e6625. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006625. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Development of a generic decision guide for patients in oncology: a qualitative interview study.肿瘤学患者通用决策指南的制定:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 10;25(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02960-6.
5
Adapting and Validating a Patient Prompt List to Assist Localized Prostate Cancer Patients with Treatment Decision Making.调整并验证一份患者提示清单,以协助局限性前列腺癌患者进行治疗决策。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 4;12(19):1981. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191981.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.
7
Enhancing doctor-patient relationships in community health care institutions: the Patient Oriented Four Habits Model (POFHM) trial-a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial protocol.提升社区医疗机构中的医患关系:以患者为中心的四项习惯模式(POFHM)试验——一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 29;23(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04948-w.
8
Communication in Cancer Care in Asia: A Narrative Review.亚洲癌症护理中的沟通:叙事综述
JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Jun;9:e2200266. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00266.