• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大民众更倾向于资助哪些公共卫生干预措施?一项离散选择实验。

What public health interventions do people in Canada prefer to fund? A discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

School of Public Health and Social Policy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 13;22(1):1178. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13539-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-13539-5
PMID:35698077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9189791/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess public support of tailored and targeted public health interventions for marginalized communities.

METHODS

We conducted a discrete choice experiment using a web-based survey advertised to Facebook and Instagram users living in Canada, aged > 16. Participants were asked to choose between funding two hypothetical public health programs. Each program was described by its purpose; expected increase in life expectancy; and target audience. Demographically weighted generalized linear mixed-effects models were constructed to identify program factors associated with program selection.

RESULTS

Participants completed up to 8 discrete choice comparison exercises each resulting in 23,889 exercises were completed by 3054 participants. Selected programs were less likely to focus on prevention (vs. treatment). For each 1-year increase in the marginal years of life gained, there was a 15% increase in the odds of a program being selected. Interventions tailored to marginalized communities or targeting stigmatized health conditions were less likely to be selected compared to interventions targeted to the general population or targeting chronic health conditions. Noteworthy exceptions included an increased preference for interventions aligning with the perceived needs or cultural expectations for marginalized communities.

CONCLUSIONS

Stigmatizing perceptions of health conditions and key populations likely influence public health programming preferences of Canadians.

PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS

Informational campaigns highlighting disparities experienced by marginalized populations may improve support for targeted and tailored interventions.

摘要

目的

评估公众对面向边缘社区的定制和靶向公共卫生干预措施的支持程度。

方法

我们使用基于网络的调查进行了离散选择实验,该调查针对居住在加拿大的年龄大于 16 岁的 Facebook 和 Instagram 用户进行宣传。参与者被要求在两个假设的公共卫生计划之间进行选择。每个计划都通过其目的、预期寿命的增加和目标受众来描述。构建了人口加权广义线性混合效应模型,以确定与计划选择相关的计划因素。

结果

参与者完成了最多 8 个离散选择比较练习,每个练习都有 3054 名参与者完成了 23889 次练习。选择的计划不太可能侧重于预防(而不是治疗)。每增加一年获得的边缘寿命,选择计划的几率就会增加 15%。与针对普通人群或针对慢性健康状况的干预措施相比,针对边缘化社区量身定制或针对污名化健康状况的干预措施不太可能被选中。值得注意的例外情况包括,人们更倾向于选择与边缘化社区的感知需求或文化期望相一致的干预措施。

结论

对健康状况和重点人群的污名化看法可能会影响加拿大人对公共卫生计划的偏好。

公共卫生意义

强调边缘化人群所经历的差距的宣传活动可能会提高对有针对性和定制干预措施的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a3/9190090/1b4aeb9b51ae/12889_2022_13539_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a3/9190090/d635cf196353/12889_2022_13539_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a3/9190090/1b4aeb9b51ae/12889_2022_13539_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a3/9190090/d635cf196353/12889_2022_13539_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a3/9190090/1b4aeb9b51ae/12889_2022_13539_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
What public health interventions do people in Canada prefer to fund? A discrete choice experiment.加拿大民众更倾向于资助哪些公共卫生干预措施?一项离散选择实验。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 13;22(1):1178. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13539-5.
2
Comparison of Equity Preferences for Life Expectancy Gains: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among the Japanese and Korean General Public.预期寿命增益的公平偏好比较:日本和韩国普通民众的离散选择实验
Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 May;18:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
3
Public preferences for interventions to prevent emerging infectious disease threats: a discrete choice experiment.公众对预防新出现传染病威胁干预措施的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 16;8(2):e017355. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017355.
4
Valuing health at the end of life: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.临终时对健康的重视:一项基于陈述偏好的离散选择实验。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jan;124:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.022. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
5
How Do Older Adults Consider Age, Life Expectancy, Quality of Life, and Physician Recommendations When Making Cancer Screening Decisions? Results from a National Survey Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.老年人在做出癌症筛查决策时如何考虑年龄、预期寿命、生活质量和医生建议?基于离散选择实验的全国性调查结果。
Med Decis Making. 2019 Aug;39(6):621-631. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19853516. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
6
Capturing Adult Patient Preferences Toward Benefits and Risks of Second-Line Antihyperglycemic Medications Used in Type 2 Diabetes: A Discrete Choice Experiment.捕获成年患者对 2 型糖尿病二线抗高血糖药物的获益-风险偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Can J Diabetes. 2020 Feb;44(1):6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 May 7.
7
A discrete-choice experiment to elicit preferences of patients with epilepsy for self-management programs.一项用于引出癫痫患者对自我管理项目偏好的离散选择实验。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Feb;79:58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.11.015. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
8
What Aspects of Illness Influence Public Preferences for Healthcare Priority Setting? A Discrete Choice Experiment in the UK.疾病的哪些方面影响公众对医疗保健优先事项设定的偏好?英国的离散选择实验。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Dec;39(12):1443-1454. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01067-w. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
9
Socioeconomic factors and parents' preferences for internet- and mobile-based parenting interventions to prevent youth mental health problems: A discrete choice experiment.社会经济因素以及父母对基于互联网和移动设备的育儿干预措施预防青少年心理健康问题的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Internet Interv. 2022 Mar 8;28:100522. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100522. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
Women's preferences for attributes of first-trimester miscarriage management: a stated preference discrete-choice experiment.女性对孕早期流产管理属性的偏好:一项陈述偏好离散选择实验
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):551-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00459.x. Epub 2008 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Continuing medical education in China: evidence from primary health workers' preferences for continuing traditional Chinese medicine education.中国的继续医学教育:来自基层卫生工作者对继续接受传统中医药教育偏好的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 3;23(1):1200. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10153-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Eliciting Health Care Preferences With Discrete Choice Experiments.通过离散选择实验引出医疗保健偏好。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e228794. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8794.
2
Application of Discrete Choice Experiment in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis.离散选择实验在医疗保健中的应用:文献计量分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 4;9:673698. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.673698. eCollection 2021.
3
Canada: Health System Review.加拿大:卫生体系综述
Health Syst Transit. 2020 Nov;22(3):1-194.
4
Describing practices of priority setting and resource allocation in publicly funded health care systems of high-income countries.描述高收入国家公共资助的医疗保健系统中优先排序和资源分配的实践。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 27;21(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06078-z.
5
The Health Equity Framework: A Science- and Justice-Based Model for Public Health Researchers and Practitioners.健康公平框架:面向公共卫生研究人员和从业者的科学与公正为本的模型。
Health Promot Pract. 2021 Nov;22(6):741-746. doi: 10.1177/1524839920950730. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
6
Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions.运用离散选择实验来衡量对难以观察的选择属性的偏好,以为卫生政策决策提供信息。
Health Econ Rev. 2020 Jun 11;10(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00276-x.
7
Public opinion about evidence-informed health policy development in U.S. Congress.公众对美国国会循证卫生政策制定的看法。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Dec 31;10(6):1549-1553. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz083.
8
Conceptual framework of equity-focused implementation research for health programs (EquIR).健康项目公平导向实施研究的概念框架(EquIR)。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 May 31;18(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0984-4.
9
Mental health and HIV/AIDS: the need for an integrated response.心理健康与艾滋病病毒/艾滋病:需要采取综合应对措施。
AIDS. 2019 Jul 15;33(9):1411-1420. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002227.
10
Equity Weights for Socioeconomic Position: Two Methods-Survey of Stated Preferences and Epidemiological Data.社会经济地位的权衡权重:两种方法——表述性偏好调查和流行病学数据。
Value Health. 2019 Feb;22(2):247-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Aug 28.