• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支付意愿阈值对肿瘤药物降价建议的影响:加拿大卫生药品和技术局所做评估综述

The impact of willingness-to-pay threshold on price reduction recommendations for oncology drugs: a review of assessments conducted by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

作者信息

Balijepalli Chakrapani, Gullapalli Lakshmi, Joshy Juhi, Rawson Nigel Sb

机构信息

Pharmalytics Group, Vancouver, BC V6B 2Z4, Canada.

Canadian Health Policy Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2024 May;13(5):e230178. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0178. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

DOI:10.57264/cer-2023-0178
PMID:38567953
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11037021/
Abstract

Since late 2020, the Canadian Agency of Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) has been using a threshold of $50,000 (CAD) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for both oncology and non-oncology drugs. When used for oncology products, this threshold is hypothesized to have a higher impact on the time to access these drugs in Canada. We studied the impact of price reductions on time to engagement and negotiation with the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance for oncology drugs reviewed by CADTH between January 2020 and December 2022. Overall, 103 assessments reported data on price reductions recommended by CADTH to meet the cost-effectiveness threshold for reimbursement. Of these assessments, 57% (59/103) recommendations included a price reduction of greater than 70% off the list price. Eight percent (8/103) were not cost-effective even at a 100% price reduction. Of the 47 assessments that had a clear benefit, in 21 (45%) CADTH recommended a price reduction of at least 70%. The median time to price negotiation (not including time to engagement) for assessments that received at least 70% vs >70% price reduction was 2.6 vs 4.8 months. This study showed that there is a divergence between drug sponsor's incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and CADTH revised ICER leading to a price reduction to meet the $50,000/QALY threshold. For the submissions with clear clinical benefit the median length of engagement (2.5 vs 3.3 months) and median length of negotiation (3.1 vs 3.6 months) were slightly shorter compared with the submissions where uncertainties were noted in the clinical benefit according to CADTH. This study shows that using a $50,000 per QALY threshold for oncology products potentially impacts timely access to life saving medications.

摘要

自2020年末以来,加拿大卫生药品和技术局(CADTH)一直将每质量调整生命年(QALY)50,000加元的阈值用于肿瘤学和非肿瘤学药物。当应用于肿瘤学产品时,该阈值被认为会对加拿大获取这些药物的时间产生更大影响。我们研究了2020年1月至2022年12月期间CADTH审查的肿瘤学药物降价对与泛加拿大药品联盟进行接触和谈判时间的影响。总体而言,103项评估报告了CADTH为达到报销成本效益阈值而建议的降价数据。在这些评估中,57%(59/103)的建议包括降价幅度超过标价的70%。8%(8/103)即使降价100%也不具有成本效益。在47项有明确益处的评估中,21项(45%)CADTH建议至少降价70%。降价至少70%与降价幅度大于70%的评估相比,价格谈判的中位时间(不包括接触时间)分别为2.6个月和4.8个月。这项研究表明,药物申办方的增量成本效益比(ICER)与CADTH修订后的ICER之间存在差异,导致降价以达到每QALY 50,000加元的阈值。对于具有明确临床益处的提交材料,与CADTH指出临床益处存在不确定性的提交材料相比,接触的中位时长(2.5个月对3.3个月)和谈判的中位时长(3.1个月对3.6个月)略短。这项研究表明,将每QALY 50,000加元的阈值用于肿瘤学产品可能会影响及时获得救命药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff44/11037021/b92e9e3ffc4d/cer-13-230178-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff44/11037021/119845e58105/cer-13-230178-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff44/11037021/49d0e2bf1ef8/cer-13-230178-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff44/11037021/41a16a54c0ca/cer-13-230178-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff44/11037021/4d217c246c84/cer-13-230178-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff44/11037021/b92e9e3ffc4d/cer-13-230178-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff44/11037021/119845e58105/cer-13-230178-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff44/11037021/49d0e2bf1ef8/cer-13-230178-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff44/11037021/41a16a54c0ca/cer-13-230178-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff44/11037021/4d217c246c84/cer-13-230178-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff44/11037021/b92e9e3ffc4d/cer-13-230178-g5.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of willingness-to-pay threshold on price reduction recommendations for oncology drugs: a review of assessments conducted by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.支付意愿阈值对肿瘤药物降价建议的影响:加拿大卫生药品和技术局所做评估综述
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 May;13(5):e230178. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0178. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
2
Health Technology Assessment Process for Oncology Drugs: Impact of CADTH Changes on Public Payer Reimbursement Recommendations.肿瘤药物的卫生技术评估过程:加拿大药品和卫生技术局(CADTH)的变化对公共支付方报销建议的影响
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 1;29(3):1514-1526. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030127.
3
Timeliness of Health Technology Assessments and Price Negotiations for Oncology Drugs in Canada.加拿大肿瘤药物卫生技术评估与价格谈判的及时性
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 May 25;16:437-445. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S462872. eCollection 2024.
4
Activities of the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance: An Observational Analysis.泛加拿大制药联盟的活动:一项观察性分析。
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug 7;25(2):e12-e22. doi: 10.22374/1710-6222.25.2.2.
5
Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?加拿大罕见病药物的卫生技术评估与价格谈判的一致性:谁受益?
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Jun 13;17(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02390-x.
6
Health Technology Assessment Reports for Non-Oncology Medications in Canada from 2018 to 2022: Methodological Critiques on Manufacturers' Submissions and a Comparison between Manufacturer and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) Analyses.2018年至2022年加拿大非肿瘤药物的卫生技术评估报告:对制造商提交材料的方法学批判以及制造商与加拿大卫生药物和技术局(CADTH)分析之间的比较。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Nov;8(6):823-836. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00511-9. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
7
Can Standard Health Technology Assessment Approaches Help Guide the Price of Orphan Drugs in Canada? A Review of Submissions to the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Common Drug Review.标准的卫生技术评估方法能否帮助指导加拿大孤儿药的定价?对提交给加拿大卫生技术评估局通用药品评审的材料的综述。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Aug 24;12:445-457. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S264589. eCollection 2020.
8
Alignment of health technology assessments and price negotiations for new drugs for rare disorders in Canada: Does it lead to improved patient access?加拿大罕见病新药的卫生技术评估与价格谈判的一致性:是否能提高患者的可及性?
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Feb 13;27(1):e48-e64. doi: 10.15586/jptcp.v27i1.658.
9
Health-related quality of life in oncology drug reimbursement submissions in Canada: A review of submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review.加拿大肿瘤药物报销申请中的健康相关生活质量:对全加肿瘤药物审查的申请评估。
Cancer. 2020 Jan 1;126(1):148-155. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32455. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
10
Clinical benefit, reimbursement outcomes, and prices of FDA-approved cancer drugs reviewed through Project Orbis in the USA, Canada, England, and Scotland: a retrospective, comparative analysis.在美国、加拿大、英国和苏格兰,通过项目观测网(Orbis)审查的 FDA 批准的癌症药物的临床获益、报销结果和价格:一项回顾性、比较分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2024 Aug;25(8):979-988. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00286-9. Epub 2024 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of an intraoperative antibacterial envelope in preventing cardiac implantable device-associated infections: a systematic review.术中抗菌包膜预防心脏植入式设备相关感染的成本效益:一项系统评价
Europace. 2025 Jul 1;27(7). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf121.
2
Time-limited reimbursement and Temporary Access Process for early access to oncology treatments in Canada: a perspective based on the epcoritamab experience.加拿大肿瘤治疗早期获取的限时报销与临时获取流程:基于依泊妥单抗经验的视角
J Comp Eff Res. 2025 Jun;14(6):e250024. doi: 10.57264/cer-2025-0024. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Adjuvant Alectinib Versus Chemotherapy for Patients with Resectable, ALK-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Canada.

本文引用的文献

1
Special FDA designations for drug development: orphan, fast track, accelerated approval, priority review, and breakthrough therapy.药物研发的特殊 FDA 认定:孤儿药、快速通道、加速批准、优先审评和突破性疗法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Aug;25(6):979-997. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01639-x. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
2
Launch and Post-Launch Prices of Injectable Cancer Drugs in the US: Clinical Benefit, Innovation, Epidemiology, and Competition.美国注射用癌症药物的上市和上市后价格:临床获益、创新、流行病学和竞争。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jan;42(1):117-131. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01320-4. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
3
FDA approval, clinical trial evidence, efficacy, epidemiology, and price for non-orphan and ultra-rare, rare, and common orphan cancer drug indications: cross sectional analysis.
加拿大可切除的ALK阳性非小细胞肺癌患者辅助使用阿来替尼与化疗的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01488-x.
4
A Hemophilia Joint Health Score-Based Model for the Economic Evaluation of Hemophilia A Prophylaxis Interventions.一种基于血友病关节健康评分的甲型血友病预防干预措施经济评估模型。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Jul;43(7):765-778. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01484-1. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
5
Timeliness of Health Technology Assessments and Price Negotiations for Oncology Drugs in Canada.加拿大肿瘤药物卫生技术评估与价格谈判的及时性
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 May 25;16:437-445. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S462872. eCollection 2024.
FDA 批准、临床试验证据、疗效、流行病学和非孤儿和超罕见、罕见和常见孤儿癌药物适应证的价格:横断面分析。
BMJ. 2023 May 9;381:e073242. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073242.
4
Launch sequencing of pharmaceuticals with multiple therapeutic indications: evidence from seven countries.多治疗适应症药品的上市序贯:来自七个国家的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 13;23(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09095-2.
5
Overall Survival, Progression-Free Survival, and Tumor Response Benefit Supporting Initial US Food and Drug Administration Approval and Indication Extension of New Cancer Drugs, 2003-2021.总生存期、无进展生存期和肿瘤反应获益支持美国食品药品监督管理局于2003年至2021年首次批准新癌症药物并扩大其适应症
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 10;40(35):4095-4106. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00535. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
6
The Economic Burden of Cancer in Canada from a Societal Perspective.从社会视角看加拿大的癌症经济负担。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Apr 14;29(4):2735-2748. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29040223.
7
Health Technology Assessment Process for Oncology Drugs: Impact of CADTH Changes on Public Payer Reimbursement Recommendations.肿瘤药物的卫生技术评估过程:加拿大药品和卫生技术局(CADTH)的变化对公共支付方报销建议的影响
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 1;29(3):1514-1526. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030127.
8
Cancer statistics, 2022.癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
9
Similarities and Differences in Health Technology Assessment Systems and Implications for Coverage Decisions: Evidence from 32 Countries.卫生技术评估系统的异同及其对覆盖决策的影响:来自32个国家的证据
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 May;6(3):315-328. doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00311-5. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
10
Potential Life-Years Lost: The Impact of the Cancer Drug Regulatory and Funding Process in Canada.潜在生命年损失:加拿大癌症药物监管和筹资过程的影响。
Oncologist. 2020 Jan;25(1):e130-e137. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0314. Epub 2019 Sep 10.