SCUT-Zhuhai Institute of Modern Industrial Innovation, School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, 381 Wushan Road, Guangzhou 510640, PR China; HNU-HSF Collaborative Innovation Laboratory, School of Food Science and Engineering, Hainan University, 58 People Road, Haikou 570228, PR China.
SCUT-Zhuhai Institute of Modern Industrial Innovation, School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, 381 Wushan Road, Guangzhou 510640, PR China.
Carbohydr Polym. 2022 Sep 1;291:119623. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119623. Epub 2022 May 17.
Gum arabic (GA) is the most widely used natural emulsifier in food industry. However, due to its high price and unstable market supply, the search for substitutes of gum arabic has attracted the attention of researchers. Recent studies have shown that sugar beet pectin (SBP) has great potential as a natural emulsifier. However, the mechanisms and differences of GA- and SBP-stabilized emulsions are still unclear. In this study, the interfacial behavior of GA and SBP on the oil-water interface was studied and compared through dissipative quartz crystal microbalance and interfacial dilatational rheology. Then, droplet size, zeta-potential and viscosity of the emulsion stabilized by GA and SBP were measured. Meanwhile, the long-term stability of GA- and SBP-stabilized emulsions was evaluated and compared through a LUMiSizer stability analyzer. The study showed that at the same concentration, SBP-stabilized emulsion had significant advantages of a smaller droplet size, a larger viscosity, a thicker and more elastic interfacial layer, and better long-term stability. A comparison of the long-term stability of SBP2.0%- and GA15.0%-stabilized emulsions, evidenced that the elasticity of the interfacial layer plays a crucial role in the long-term stability of emulsions. This research may provide useful information for finding alternatives to GA.
阿拉伯胶(GA)是食品工业中应用最广泛的天然乳化剂。然而,由于其价格高且市场供应不稳定,寻找阿拉伯胶的替代品引起了研究人员的关注。最近的研究表明,糖甜菜果胶(SBP)作为一种天然乳化剂具有很大的潜力。然而,GA 和 SBP 稳定的乳状液的机制和差异仍不清楚。在本研究中,通过耗散石英晶体微天平(D-QCM)和界面扩张流变学研究并比较了 GA 和 SBP 在油水界面上的界面行为。然后,测量了由 GA 和 SBP 稳定的乳液的粒径、Zeta 电位和粘度。同时,通过 LUMiSizer 稳定性分析仪评估和比较了 GA 和 SBP 稳定的乳状液的长期稳定性。研究表明,在相同浓度下,SBP 稳定的乳液具有更小的粒径、更大的粘度、更厚且更有弹性的界面层以及更好的长期稳定性等显著优势。对 SBP2.0%-和 GA15.0%-稳定的乳液的长期稳定性进行比较,证明了界面层的弹性在乳液的长期稳定性中起着关键作用。这项研究可能为寻找 GA 的替代品提供有用的信息。