• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少学校欺凌受害发生率和减轻其心理健康影响的家庭干预的实证和理论基础。

Empirical and theoretical foundations of family interventions to reduce the incidence and mental health impacts of school bullying victimization.

机构信息

QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Qld, Australia.

School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Qld, Australia.

出版信息

Int Rev Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 17;34(2):140-153. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2022.2045260. Epub 2022 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1080/09540261.2022.2045260
PMID:35699098
Abstract

Bullying victimisation is a serious risk factor for mental health problems in children and adolescents. School bullying prevention programs have consistently produced small to moderate reductions in victimisation and perpetration. However, these programs do not necessarily help all students affected by bullying. Paradoxically whole-school programs lead to higher levels of depression and poorer self-esteem for students who continue to be victimised after program implementation. This may be because some elements of whole-school programs make victims more visible to their peers, thus further eroding their peer social status. Three main identified risk factors for children and adolescents who continue to be victimised following school bullying prevention programs are peer rejection, internalising problems, and lower quality parent-child relationships. All are potentially modifiable through family interventions. A large body of research demonstrates the influence of families on children's social skills, peer relationships and emotional regulation. This paper describes the theoretical foundations and empirical evidence for reducing the incidence and mental health outcomes of school bullying victimisation through family interventions. Family interventions should be available to complement school efforts to reduce bullying and improve the mental health of young people.

摘要

受欺凌是儿童和青少年心理健康问题的一个严重风险因素。学校欺凌预防计划一直能在一定程度上减少受欺凌和欺凌行为。然而,这些计划并不一定能帮助所有受欺凌影响的学生。矛盾的是,对于那些在计划实施后仍继续受欺凌的学生来说,全员参与的学校计划会导致更高的抑郁水平和更低的自尊心。这可能是因为全员参与的学校计划的某些元素使受害者更容易被同龄人看到,从而进一步削弱了他们的同伴社会地位。在学校欺凌预防计划之后继续受欺凌的儿童和青少年的三个主要确定的风险因素是同伴拒绝、内化问题和较差的亲子关系。所有这些都可以通过家庭干预来改变。大量研究表明,家庭对儿童的社交技能、同伴关系和情绪调节有影响。本文描述了通过家庭干预减少学校欺凌受害发生率和心理健康结果的理论基础和实证证据。家庭干预应该作为学校减少欺凌和改善年轻人心理健康的努力的补充。

相似文献

1
Empirical and theoretical foundations of family interventions to reduce the incidence and mental health impacts of school bullying victimization.减少学校欺凌受害发生率和减轻其心理健康影响的家庭干预的实证和理论基础。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 17;34(2):140-153. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2022.2045260. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
2
Editorial: Selective Prevention in Anti-Bullying Programs: Could Targeting Personality Be the Answer?社论:反欺凌计划中的选择性预防:针对个性特征是否可行?
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;59(4):504-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
3
Combining whole-school and targeted programs for the reduction of bullying victimization: A randomized, effectiveness trial.结合全校和有针对性的项目减少受欺凌:一项随机、有效性试验。
Aggress Behav. 2020 May;46(3):193-209. doi: 10.1002/ab.21881. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
4
Protecting the mental health of future adults: Disentangling the determinants of adolescent bullying victimisation.保护未来成年人的心理健康:厘清青少年受欺凌的决定因素。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 May;253:112942. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112942. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
5
Early risk factors for joint trajectories of bullying victimisation and perpetration.早期风险因素对受欺凌和欺凌行为轨迹的影响。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;32(9):1723-1731. doi: 10.1007/s00787-022-01989-6. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
6
Mental health problems both precede and follow bullying among adolescents and the effects differ by gender: a cross-lagged panel analysis of school-based longitudinal data in Vietnam.心理健康问题在青少年受欺凌之前和之后都存在,且影响因性别而异:越南一项基于学校纵向数据的交叉滞后面板分析。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 May 18;13:35. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0291-x. eCollection 2019.
7
Effectiveness and micro-costing of the KiVa school-based bullying prevention programme in Wales: study protocol for a pragmatic definitive parallel group cluster randomised controlled trial.威尔士KiVa校内欺凌预防项目的有效性及微观成本核算:一项实用确定性平行组整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 1;16:104. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2746-1.
8
Randomized controlled trial of a family intervention for children bullied by peers.针对遭受同伴欺凌儿童的家庭干预随机对照试验。
Behav Ther. 2014 Nov;45(6):760-77. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
9
Who Becomes a Bullying Perpetrator After the Experience of Bullying Victimization? The Moderating Role of Self-esteem.遭受欺凌经历后谁会成为欺凌加害者?自尊的调节作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Nov;47(11):2414-2423. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0913-7. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
10
Bullying victimisation, internalising symptoms, and conduct problems in South African children and adolescents: a longitudinal investigation.南非儿童和青少年中的欺凌受害情况、内化症状及行为问题:一项纵向调查
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014 Nov;42(8):1313-24. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9888-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between school bullying and internet addiction among adolescents: a moderated mediation model.青少年中校园欺凌与网络成瘾之间的关联:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 27;13:1502726. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1502726. eCollection 2025.
2
The Relationship of Rejection Sensitivity to Depressive Symptoms in Adolescence: The Indirect Effect of Perceived Social Acceptance by Peers.青少年期拒绝敏感性与抑郁症状的关系:同伴感知社会接纳的间接影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Dec 22;14(1):10. doi: 10.3390/bs14010010.