Departamento de Pediatría, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Menufia, Shibin el-Kom, Egypt.
Departamento de Pediatría, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Menufia, Shibin el-Kom, Egypt.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2022 May;96(5):402-409. doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is commonly used in Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs). However, strong evidence for this practice is lacking and there is a dire need for paediatric randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our aim was to assess the usefulness of SUP with omeprazole in critically ill children.
We conducted a randomized, controlled open-label trial, including 144 children admitted into a PICU with a paediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score of less than 16. We randomly allocated patients to SUP with omeprazole or no SUP. The primary outcome was development of upper gastrointestinal bleeding or nosocomial infection.
The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding was 27.1%, but clinically significant bleeding developed in only 5.6% of patients. We did not find a significant difference in the incidence of bleeding between the prophylaxis and control groups (27.8% vs 26.4%; P = .85). We also did not find a significant difference between the groups in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (9.6% vs 8.3%; P = .77). The incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) was higher in the prophylaxis group compared to the control group (30.6% vs 12.5%; P = .014). None of the patients developed Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. We did not find significant differences in mortality, length of PICU stay or duration of mechanical ventilation. Mechanical ventilation was an independent predictor of bleeding (OR, 6.4; 95%CI, 2.73-14.9).
In PICU patients with mild to moderate organ dysfunction, omeprazole does not seem to be useful for prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding while at the same time increasing the risk of CLABSI. Thus, we recommend restricting SUP to mechanically ventilated children.
应激性溃疡预防(SUP)在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中普遍应用。然而,该实践缺乏强有力的证据,急需开展儿科随机对照试验(RCT)。本研究旨在评估使用奥美拉唑预防 SUP 在危重症患儿中的作用。
我们开展了一项随机、对照、开放标签试验,纳入了 144 名进入 PICU 且儿科序贯器官衰竭评估(pSOFA)评分<16 的患儿。我们将患者随机分为奥美拉唑 SUP 组或无 SUP 组。主要结局为上消化道出血或医院获得性感染的发生。
胃肠道出血的发生率为 27.1%,但仅有 5.6%的患者出现有临床意义的出血。我们未发现预防组和对照组出血发生率有显著差异(27.8%比 26.4%;P=0.85)。两组呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发生率也无显著差异(9.6%比 8.3%;P=0.77)。预防组中心静脉相关血流感染(CLABSI)的发生率高于对照组(30.6%比 12.5%;P=0.014)。无患者发生艰难梭菌相关性腹泻。两组死亡率、PICU 住院时间或机械通气时间均无显著差异。机械通气是出血的独立预测因素(OR,6.4;95%CI,2.73-14.9)。
在器官功能轻度至中度障碍的 PICU 患儿中,奥美拉唑似乎不能预防胃肠道出血,反而增加 CLABSI 的风险。因此,我们建议将 SUP 仅限于机械通气患儿。