Stanley Thomas R, Knopf Fritz L
U.S. Geological Survey, Midcontinent Ecological Science Center, Fort Collins, CO 80525-3400, U.S.A.
Conserv Biol. 2002 Feb;16(1):225-231. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00269.x.
Riparian vegetation in western North America provides important habitat for breeding birds and valuable forage for grazing livestock. Whereas a number of studies have documented the response of riparian vegetation to the removal of cattle, few have experimentally evaluated specific grazing systems. We evaluated the responses of vegetation and breeding birds to two cycles of late-season (August-September) grazing followed by 34 months of rest on the Arapaho National Wildlife Refuge, Colorado. We used a before-and-after control-impact (BACI) design, with two control (ungrazed) and two treatment ( grazed) pastures composing the experimental units. Vegetation characteristics and bird densities were quantified on sample plots prior to and following two cycles of the treatment. We found no statistical differences in vegetation change and few differences in bird-density change among pastures. Inspection of means for pastures, however, suggests that changes in shrub vigor and spatial pattern differed among ungrazed and grazed pastures and that changes in population density for three of the nine bird species and three guilds studied differed among pastures. Our results suggest that habitat for grazing-sensitive birds may be restored while still allowing late-season grazing, although the rate at which species are recovered will be slower than if all cattle are removed.
北美西部的河岸植被为繁殖鸟类提供了重要栖息地,也为放牧牲畜提供了宝贵的草料。虽然有多项研究记录了河岸植被对去除牛群的反应,但很少有研究对特定的放牧系统进行实验评估。我们在科罗拉多州的阿拉帕霍国家野生动物保护区评估了植被和繁殖鸟类对两个周期的季末(8月至9月)放牧以及随后34个月休牧的反应。我们采用了前后对照影响(BACI)设计,以两个对照(未放牧)牧场和两个处理(放牧)牧场作为实验单元。在两个周期的处理前后,对样地的植被特征和鸟类密度进行了量化。我们发现牧场之间在植被变化上没有统计学差异,鸟类密度变化的差异也很少。然而,对牧场均值的检查表明,未放牧和放牧牧场之间灌木活力和空间格局的变化有所不同,并且所研究的9种鸟类中的3种以及3个鸟类群落的种群密度变化在牧场之间也存在差异。我们的结果表明,虽然允许季末放牧,但对放牧敏感鸟类的栖息地仍可能得到恢复,尽管物种恢复的速度将比去除所有牛群的情况要慢。