Suppr超能文献

利用脸书新冠疫情趋势与影响调查的1300万份回复,研究2021年1月至2022年2月期间的疫苗犹豫、疫苗接种和戴口罩情况。

Leveraging 13 million responses to the Facebook COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey to examine vaccine hesitancy, vaccination, and mask wearing, January 2021-February 2022.

作者信息

Nguyen Quynh C, Yardi Isha, Gutierrez Francia Ximena Marin, Mane Heran, Yue Xiaohe

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, Maryland, United States.

Department of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Res Sq. 2022 Jun 10:rs.3.rs-1712246. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1712246/v1.

Abstract

The urgency of the COVID-19 global pandemic called upon the joint efforts from the scientific and private sectors to work together to track vaccine acceptance, prevention behaviors, and symptoms. Our study utilized individual responses to the Facebook’s COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey from January 2021 to February 2022 (n=13,426,245) to examine contextual and individual-level predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, vaccination, and mask wearing. Adjusted logistic regression models were developed to examine individual and zip code predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and vaccination status. Given the COVID vaccine was rolled out in phases in the U.S. we conducted analyses stratified by time, January 2021-May 2021 (Time 1) and June 2021-February 2022 (Time 2). On January 2021 only 9% of Facebook respondents reported receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, and 45% were vaccine hesitant. By February 2022, 80% of respondents were vaccinated and only 18% were vaccine hesitant. Individuals who were older, held higher educational degrees, worked in white collar jobs, wore a mask most of the time or some of the time, and identified as white and Asian had higher COVID-19 vaccination rates and lower vaccine hesitancy across Time 1 and Time 2. COVID vaccinations were lower among essential workers and blue-collar occupations (OR=0.31-0.40) including those in food preparation and serving, construction, installation and repair, transportation, and production in Time 1. In Time 2, these disparities attenuated but were still present (OR-0.36-0.64). For these same occupation groups, vaccine hesitancy was higher (OR=1.88-2.30 in Time 1) and (OR=2.05-2.80 in Time 2). By Time 2, all adults were eligible for the COVID-19 vaccine, but blacks (OR=0.71; 95% CI: 0.70-0.72) and multiracial (OR=0.47; 95% CI: 0.47-0.48) individuals had lower vaccination and higher vaccine hesitancy compared to whites. Associations found in earlier phases of the pandemic were generally found to also be present later in the pandemic, indicating stability in inequities. Additionally, inequities in these important outcomes suggests more work is needed to bridge gaps to ensure that the burden of COVID-19 risk does not disproportionately fall upon subgroups of the population.

摘要

新冠疫情全球大流行的紧迫性促使科学界和私营部门共同努力,追踪疫苗接受情况、预防行为和症状。我们的研究利用了2021年1月至2022年2月期间对脸书新冠疫情趋势与影响调查的个人回复(n = 13426245),以研究新冠疫苗犹豫、接种情况和佩戴口罩的背景及个人层面预测因素。我们建立了调整后的逻辑回归模型,以研究新冠疫苗犹豫和接种状况的个人及邮政编码层面预测因素。鉴于新冠疫苗在美国分阶段推出,我们按时间进行了分层分析,即2021年1月至2021年5月(时间1)和2021年6月至2022年2月(时间2)。2021年1月,只有9%的脸书受访者表示接种了新冠疫苗,45%的人对疫苗持犹豫态度。到2022年2月,80%的受访者接种了疫苗,只有18%的人对疫苗持犹豫态度。在时间1和时间2期间,年龄较大、受教育程度较高、从事白领工作、大部分时间或有时佩戴口罩,以及自认为是白人和亚洲人的个体,新冠疫苗接种率较高,疫苗犹豫程度较低。在时间1,包括食品制备和服务、建筑、安装和维修、运输及生产行业的一线工作人员和蓝领职业人群中的新冠疫苗接种率较低(优势比=0.31 - 0.40)。在时间2,这些差距有所缩小但仍然存在(优势比=0.36 - 0.64)。对于这些相同的职业群体,疫苗犹豫程度较高(时间1的优势比=1.88 - 2.30)和(时间2的优势比=2.05 - 2.80)。到时间2时,所有成年人都有资格接种新冠疫苗,但与白人相比,黑人(优势比=0.71;95%置信区间:0.70 - 0.72)和多种族人群(优势比=0.47;95%置信区间:0.47 - 0.48)的接种率较低,疫苗犹豫程度较高。在疫情早期阶段发现的关联在疫情后期通常也存在,这表明不平等现象具有稳定性。此外,这些重要结果中的不平等现象表明,需要做更多工作来弥合差距,以确保新冠风险负担不会不成比例地落在部分人群亚组身上。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a919/9196118/791b13715758/nihpp-rs1712246v1-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验