Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4355, United States of America.
Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, 2001 N Soto Street, 302-C, Los Angeles, CA 90089, United States of America.
Prev Med. 2022 Jun;159:107077. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107077. Epub 2022 May 6.
COVID-19 vaccines have been available for over a year, yet 26% of U.S. young adults remain unvaccinated. This study examines racial and ethnic disparities in young adult vaccine hesitancy and attitudes/beliefs that mediate disparities in vaccine hesitancy. Young adults (n = 2041;Mean[SD]:21.3[0.7] years-old) from a Los Angeles, CA, USA cohort were surveyed online in January-May 2021 and classified as vaccine hesitant (those who reported "Not at all likely"/"Not very likely" /"Slightly likely" to get vaccinated) versus non-hesitant (those who reported "Moderately likely"/"Very likely"/"Definitely likely" to get vaccinated or already vaccinated). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine racial/ethnic disparities in vaccine hesitancy. Factor analysis was conducted to create three subscales toward vaccination: positive, negative, and lack-of-access beliefs. Mediation analyses were performed to assess pathways from attitude/belief subscales to racial disparities in vaccine hesitancy. Overall 33.0% of respondents reported vaccine hesitancy. Black vs. White young adults had a higher prevalence of vaccine hesitancy (AOR[95%CI] = 4.3[2.4-7.8]), and Asians vs. Whites had a lower prevalence (AOR[95%CI] = 0.5[0.3-0.8]). Mediators explained 90% of the Black (vs. White) disparity in vaccine hesitancy, including significant indirect effects through positive belief-reducing (β = 0.23,p < .001) and negative belief-enhancing (β = 0.02,p = .04) effects. About 81% of the Asian (vs. White) disparity in vaccine hesitancy was explained by the three combined subscales, including significant positive belief-reducing (β = -0.18,p < .001) indirect effect. Substantial racial and ethnic disparities in young adult COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were found, which were mediated by differences in attitudes and beliefs toward vaccination. Targeted education campaigns and messages are needed to promote equitable utilization of the effective vaccine.
新冠病毒疫苗问世已经一年有余,但仍有 26%的美国年轻成年人未接种疫苗。本研究旨在探讨年轻成年人疫苗犹豫的种族和民族差异,以及导致疫苗犹豫差异的态度/信念因素。2021 年 1 月至 5 月,通过在线调查的方式对来自美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的一个队列中的 2041 名年轻成年人进行了调查,并将其分为疫苗犹豫组(报告“完全不可能”/“不太可能”/“稍微有可能”接种疫苗)和非犹豫组(报告“比较可能”/“非常可能”/“肯定会”接种疫苗或已经接种疫苗)。采用多变量逻辑回归分析疫苗犹豫的种族/民族差异。通过因子分析,我们创建了三个与疫苗接种相关的子量表:积极、消极和缺乏途径信念。采用中介分析评估了态度/信念子量表与疫苗犹豫的种族差异之间的关系。总体而言,33.0%的受访者报告存在疫苗犹豫。与白人相比,黑人和美洲原住民年轻成年人的疫苗犹豫率更高(优势比[95%置信区间]为 4.3[2.4-7.8]),而亚洲人比白人的疫苗犹豫率更低(优势比[95%置信区间]为 0.5[0.3-0.8])。这些因素解释了 90%的黑人和白人之间疫苗犹豫的差异,包括通过积极信念降低(β=0.23,p<0.001)和消极信念增强(β=0.02,p=0.04)的显著间接效应。81%的亚洲人和白人之间疫苗犹豫的差异可以通过三个子量表共同解释,包括显著的积极信念降低(β=-0.18,p<0.001)间接效应。本研究发现,年轻成年人对新冠病毒疫苗的犹豫存在明显的种族和民族差异,这与他们对疫苗接种的态度和信念差异有关。需要开展有针对性的教育宣传活动和信息传递,以促进有效疫苗的公平使用。