• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同创造、共同设计、共同生产促进公共卫生-对定义和区别的看法。

Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health - a perspective on definition and distinctions.

机构信息

Institute of Health Transformation, Global Obesity Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia;

Institute of Health Transformation, Global Obesity Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Public Health Res Pract. 2022 Jun 15;32(2):3222211. doi: 10.17061/phrp3222211.

DOI:10.17061/phrp3222211
PMID:35702744
Abstract

Collaboration between community members, researchers, and policy makers drives efforts to solve complex health problems such as obesity, alcohol misuse, and type 2 diabetes. Community participation is essential to ensure the optimal design, implementation and evaluation of resulting initiatives. The terms 'co-creation', 'co-design' and 'co-production' have been used interchangeably to describe the development of initiatives involving multiple stakeholders. While commonalities exist across these concepts, they have essential distinctions for public health, particularly related to the role of stakeholders and the extent and timing of their engagement. We summarise these similarities and differences drawing from the cross-disciplinary literature, including public administration and governance, service management, design, marketing and public health. Co-creation is an overarching guiding principle encompassing co-design and co-production. A clear definition of these terms clarifies aspects of participatory action research for community-based public health initiatives.

摘要

社区成员、研究人员和政策制定者之间的合作推动了解决肥胖、酗酒和 2 型糖尿病等复杂健康问题的努力。社区参与对于确保相关倡议的最佳设计、实施和评估至关重要。“共同创造”、“共同设计”和“共同生产”这些术语被交替使用,来描述涉及多个利益相关者的倡议的发展。虽然这些概念有共同之处,但它们对公共卫生具有重要的区别,特别是在利益相关者的角色以及他们参与的程度和时间方面。我们从跨学科文献中总结了这些相似之处和区别,包括公共行政和治理、服务管理、设计、营销和公共卫生。共同创造是一个总体指导原则,包含了共同设计和共同生产。这些术语的明确定义阐明了基于社区的公共卫生倡议中参与式行动研究的各个方面。

相似文献

1
Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health - a perspective on definition and distinctions.共同创造、共同设计、共同生产促进公共卫生-对定义和区别的看法。
Public Health Res Pract. 2022 Jun 15;32(2):3222211. doi: 10.17061/phrp3222211.
2
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
3
Involving the public and other stakeholders in development and evaluation of a community pharmacy alcohol screening and brief advice service.让公众和其他利益相关者参与到社区药店酒精筛查和简短咨询服务的开发和评估中。
Public Health. 2014 Apr;128(4):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.11.001. Epub 2014 Apr 6.
4
Achieving Research Impact Through Co-creation in Community-Based Health Services: Literature Review and Case Study.通过社区卫生服务中的共同创造实现研究影响力:文献综述与案例研究
Milbank Q. 2016 Jun;94(2):392-429. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12197.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
A personal reflection on co-creation in public health: a dream partly realised.个人对公共卫生共创的反思:部分梦想已成真。
Public Health Res Pract. 2022 Jun 15;32(2):3222210. doi: 10.17061/phrp3222210.
7
Involving the public in mental health and learning disability research: Can we, should we, do we?让公众参与心理健康和学习障碍研究:我们能吗?我们应该吗?我们做到了吗?
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Oct;24(8):570-579. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12404. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
8
Research circles as a method for implementing new services in the public health and welfare system.研究圈作为在公共卫生和福利系统中实施新服务的方法。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2366087. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2366087. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
9
A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.对研究伙伴关系方法的原则、策略、结果和影响的综述:综合研究伙伴关系文献的第一步。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 25;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9.
10
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.

引用本文的文献

1
A Co-Created, Community-Informed Model for Electric Vehicle Adoption in Disadvantaged Communities.一种为弱势社区采用电动汽车而共同创建、基于社区信息的模式。
Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2025 Sep;146. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2025.104853. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
2
Mixed methods systematic review of consumer engagement in rural health practice, research, and education.农村医疗卫生实践、研究与教育中消费者参与情况的混合方法系统评价。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jul 1;40(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf140.
3
Participatory Development of Digital Innovations for Health Promotion Among Older Adults: Qualitative Insights on Individual, Contextual, and Technical Factors.
老年人健康促进数字创新的参与式发展:关于个体、背景和技术因素的定性见解
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 21;22(8):1311. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081311.
4
The MyRelief Digital Educational Self-Management Program for Persistent Low Back Pain: Feasibility Uncontrolled Trial.用于持续性下腰痛的MyRelief数字教育自我管理计划:可行性非对照试验
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 27;9:e74948. doi: 10.2196/74948.
5
Facilitators and barriers to codesigning social robots with older adults living with dementia: A scoping review.与患有痴呆症的老年人共同设计社交机器人的促进因素和障碍:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 17;11:20552076251365066. doi: 10.1177/20552076251365066. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
The Heart Health Yarning Tool: Co-Designing a Shared Decision-Making Tool With Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Risk Management.心脏健康预警工具:与原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民共同设计一个用于心血管疾病预防和风险管理的共享决策工具。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70387. doi: 10.1111/hex.70387.
7
Active involvement of children aged 11-12 years in the development of a healthy nutrition intervention - a qualitative evaluation from researchers' and children's perspectives.11至12岁儿童积极参与健康营养干预措施的制定——从研究人员和儿童视角进行的定性评估
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 14;25(1):2767. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24019-x.
8
Educated peers' experiences and perceptions of the group-based FallFitness exercise programme for older adults.受过教育的同龄人对老年人基于群体的秋季健身锻炼计划的体验和看法。
Age Ageing. 2025 Aug 1;54(8). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf218.
9
Ganz Salzburg bewegen [All of Salzburg Moving]: a large-scale public involvement project with underserved groups, for the co-design of local and contextualized physical activity promotion concepts.整个萨尔茨堡行动:一个针对服务不足群体的大规模公众参与项目,旨在共同设计本地化和情境化的体育活动推广概念。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 5;11(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00766-4.
10
The involvement of individuals with speech and language impairments in research: insights from a co-creation process.有言语和语言障碍的个体参与研究:共同创造过程中的见解。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 4;11(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00762-8.