Suppr超能文献

比较超脉冲铥光纤激光与低功率钬激光在小儿输尿管镜手术中的效果。

Comparing Pediatric Ureteroscopy Outcomes with SuperPulsed Thulium Fiber Laser and Low-Power Holmium:YAG Laser.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Urol. 2022 Aug;208(2):426-433. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002666. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The thulium fiber laser is a promising new lithoptripsy technology never before studied in the pediatric population. Our center adopted the first platform in North America, the SuperPulsed thulium fiber laser (SPTF). We aimed to compare outcomes in pediatric ureteroscopy using the SPTF to those using the gold standard, low-power holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, consecutive cohort study of unilateral ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy performed in pediatric patients from 2016 to 2021 as an early adopter of the SPTF. Thirty-day complications and stone-free status, defined as the absence of a stone fragment on followup imaging within 90 days, were analyzed using logistic regression. Operative times were compared using linear regression. Propensity scores for use of SPTF were used in regression analyses to account for potential cohort imbalance.

RESULTS

A total of 125 cases were performed in 109 pediatric patients: 93 with Ho:YAG and 32 with SPTF. No significant difference was noted in age (p=0.2), gender (p=0.6), stone burden (p >0.9) or stone location (p=0.1). The overall stone-free rate was 62%; 70% with SPTF and 59% with Ho:YAG. The odds of having a residual stone fragment were significantly lower with SPTF than with Ho:YAG (OR=0.39, 95% CI: 0.19-0.77, p=0.01). There was no significant difference in operative time (p=0.8). Seven (25%) complications were noted with SPTF and 19 (22%) with Ho:YAG (p=0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

The SPTF laser was associated with a higher stone-free rate than the low-power Ho:YAG laser without compromising operative time and safety.

摘要

目的

铥光纤激光是一种有前途的新型碎石技术,以前从未在儿科人群中研究过。我们中心采用了北美第一台 SuperPulsed 铥光纤激光(SPTF)。我们旨在比较使用 SPTF 的小儿输尿管镜检查的结果与使用金标准低功率钬:钇-铝-石榴石(Ho:YAG)激光的结果。

材料和方法

这是一项回顾性、连续队列研究,对 2016 年至 2021 年期间作为 SPTF 的早期采用者进行的单侧输尿管镜检查和激光碎石术的小儿患者进行分析。使用逻辑回归分析 30 天并发症和无结石状态(定义为在 90 天内随访成像中无结石碎片)。使用线性回归比较手术时间。使用倾向评分进行 SPTF 使用的回归分析,以说明潜在的队列不平衡。

结果

共对 109 例小儿患者的 125 例进行了手术:93 例采用 Ho:YAG,32 例采用 SPTF。年龄(p=0.2)、性别(p=0.6)、结石负荷(p>0.9)或结石位置(p=0.1)无显著差异。总体无结石率为 62%;SPTF 为 70%,Ho:YAG 为 59%。与 Ho:YAG 相比,SPTF 组有残留结石碎片的可能性明显降低(OR=0.39,95%CI:0.19-0.77,p=0.01)。手术时间无显著差异(p=0.8)。SPTF 组有 7 例(25%)并发症,Ho:YAG 组有 19 例(22%)(p=0.6)。

结论

SPTF 激光与低功率 Ho:YAG 激光相比,结石清除率更高,而不会影响手术时间和安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验