Department of Urology, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
University of Kansas, School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
J Endourol. 2023 Jan;37(1):99-104. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0195. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
Digital ureteroscopes employ "chip-on-the-tip" technology that allows for significant improvement in image resolution. However, image distortion often occurs during laser lithotripsy owing to acoustic wave production. We sought to compare image distortion using different laser power settings and distances from the laser fiber tip to the scope for the Super Pulsed Thulium Fiber (SPTF) laser and high-power Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser. Ureteroscopy was simulated using a silicon kidney-ureter-bladder model fitted with a 12F/14F access sheath and the Lithovue™ (Boston Scientific), disposable digital flexible ureteroscope. At defined laser parameters (10, 20, 30 and 40 W, short pulse), a 200-μm laser fiber was slowly retracted toward the tip of the ureteroscope during laser activation. Image distortion was identified, and distance from the laser tip to the scope tip was determined. Data from the two lasers were compared utilizing -tests. After controlling for frequency, power, and laser mode, utilizing 1.0 J of energy was significantly associated with less feedback than 0.5 J (-0.091 mm, ≤ 0.05). Increased power was associated with larger feedback distance (0.016 mm, ≤ 0.05); however, increase in frequency did not have a significant effect (-0.001 mm, = 0.39). The SPFT laser had significantly less feedback when compared with all Holmium laser modes. Increased total power results in image distortion occurring at greater distances from the tip of the ureteroscope during laser activation. Image distortion occurs further from the ureteroscope with Ho:YAG laser than with SPTF fibers at the same laser settings. In clinical practice, the tip of the laser fiber should be kept further away from the tip of the scope during ureteroscopy as the power increases as well as when utilizing the Ho:YAG system compared with the SPTF laser platform. The SPTF laser may have a better safety profile in terms of potential scope damage.
数字输尿管镜采用“尖端上的芯片”技术,可显著提高图像分辨率。然而,由于声波的产生,在激光碎石术过程中经常会出现图像失真。我们旨在比较不同激光功率设置和激光光纤尖端与输尿管镜之间的距离下使用 Super Pulsed Thulium Fiber(SPTF)激光和大功率钬:钇铝石榴石(Ho:YAG)激光时的图像失真。使用配备 12F/14F 接入鞘和 Lithovue™(波士顿科学公司)一次性数字柔性输尿管镜的硅肾输尿管膀胱模型模拟输尿管镜检查。在定义的激光参数(10、20、30 和 40 W,短脉冲)下,在激光激活过程中,将 200-μm 的激光光纤缓慢向输尿管镜尖端缩回。确定图像失真,并确定激光尖端与镜尖端的距离。利用 t 检验比较两种激光的数据。 在控制频率、功率和激光模式后,利用 1.0 J 的能量与 0.5 J 的能量相比,反馈明显减少(-0.091 mm,≤0.05)。功率增加与较大的反馈距离相关(0.016 mm,≤0.05);然而,频率增加没有显著影响(-0.001 mm,=0.39)。与所有钬激光模式相比,SPFT 激光的反馈明显较少。 在激光激活过程中,总功率增加会导致图像失真发生在离输尿管镜尖端更远的距离处。在相同的激光设置下,与 SPTF 光纤相比,Ho:YAG 激光的图像失真发生在离输尿管镜更远的位置。在临床实践中,随着功率的增加以及与 SPTF 激光平台相比使用 Ho:YAG 系统时,应将激光光纤的尖端保持在离输尿管镜尖端更远的位置。与 SPTF 激光平台相比,SPTF 激光在潜在的镜损坏方面可能具有更好的安全性。