• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能手机应用程序测量屈光不正的初步评估。

Preliminary Evaluation of a Smartphone App for Refractive Error Measurement.

机构信息

Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Feb 1;11(2):40. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.2.40.

DOI:10.1167/tvst.11.2.40
PMID:35703567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8899852/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential feasibility of using a smartphone app in myopia screening.

METHODS

The app estimates myopic refractive error by measuring the far point distance for reading three 20/20 Tumbling E letters. In total, 113 myopic subjects with astigmatism no greater than -1.75 diopters (D) were enrolled from 5 sites. The mean age was 22 ± 8.5 years. The app measurement was compared with noncycloplegic subjective refraction measurement or autorefractor if subjective refraction was not available. In addition, 22 subjects were tested with the app for repeatability.

RESULTS

For 201 eyes included, the range of spherical equivalent refraction error was 0 to -10.2 D. The app measurement and clinical measurement was highly correlated (Pearson R = 0.91, P < 0.001). There was a small bias (0.17 D) in the app measurement overall, and it was significantly different across the 5 sites due to different age of subjects enrolled at those sites (P = 0.001) - young adults in their 20s were underestimated the most by 0.49 D, whereas children were overestimated by 0.29 D. The mean absolute deviation of the app measurement was 0.65 D. The repeatability of multiple testing in terms of 95% limit of agreement was ±0.61 D.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the app measurement is consistent with clinical measurement performed by vision care professionals. The repeatability is comparable with that of some autorefractors. Age-associated human factors may influence the app measurement.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

The app could be potentially used as a mass screening tool for myopia.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估使用智能手机应用程序进行近视筛查的潜在可行性。

方法

该应用程序通过测量阅读三个 20/20 Tumbling E 字母的远距距离来估计近视屈光不正。总共从 5 个地点招募了 113 名散光不超过-1.75 屈光度(D)的近视受试者。平均年龄为 22 ± 8.5 岁。如果无法进行主观验光,则将应用程序测量结果与非睫状肌麻痹主观验光或自动验光仪进行比较。此外,对 22 名受试者进行了应用程序的可重复性测试。

结果

对于包括的 201 只眼睛,球镜等效屈光误差范围为 0 至-10.2 D。应用程序测量值与临床测量值高度相关(Pearson R = 0.91,P < 0.001)。整体上,应用程序测量值存在较小的偏差(0.17 D),并且由于在这些地点招募的受试者年龄不同,应用程序测量值在 5 个地点之间存在显著差异(P = 0.001)-20 多岁的年轻人被低估了 0.49 D,而儿童则被高估了 0.29 D。应用程序测量值的平均绝对偏差为 0.65 D。以 95%一致性界限表示的多次测试的重复性为±0.61 D。

结论

总体而言,应用程序测量值与视力保健专业人员进行的临床测量值一致。重复性与某些自动验光仪相当。与年龄相关的人为因素可能会影响应用程序的测量值。

翻译贡献者

Zhonglin Li

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc0b/8899852/f780ce0ce743/tvst-11-2-40-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc0b/8899852/147fce0ba4ca/tvst-11-2-40-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc0b/8899852/60482e049539/tvst-11-2-40-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc0b/8899852/0cd25f1ebeb3/tvst-11-2-40-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc0b/8899852/f780ce0ce743/tvst-11-2-40-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc0b/8899852/147fce0ba4ca/tvst-11-2-40-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc0b/8899852/60482e049539/tvst-11-2-40-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc0b/8899852/0cd25f1ebeb3/tvst-11-2-40-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc0b/8899852/f780ce0ce743/tvst-11-2-40-f004.jpg

相似文献

1
Preliminary Evaluation of a Smartphone App for Refractive Error Measurement.智能手机应用程序测量屈光不正的初步评估。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Feb 1;11(2):40. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.2.40.
2
Does the Accuracy and Repeatability of Refractive Error Estimates Depend on the Measurement Principle of Autorefractors?自动折射仪的测量原理是否会影响屈光不正估计的准确性和可重复性?
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Jan 5;10(1):2. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.1.2. eCollection 2021 Jan.
3
Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?使用自动验光仪(Grand-Seiko WV-500)进行复验验光时涉及的系统测量误差:通过眼镜镜片测量调节滞后是否有效?
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007 May;27(3):281-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00466.x.
4
Accuracy of autorefraction in an adult Indian population.在成年印度人群中自动折射的准确性。
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251583. eCollection 2021.
5
Agreement Between Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in Keraring-Implanted Keratoconic Eyes.角膜交联植入圆锥角膜眼中自动验光与主观验光的一致性
Eye Contact Lens. 2017 Mar;43(2):116-122. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000244.
6
Smartphone Use Associated with Refractive Error in Teenagers: The Myopia App Study.智能手机使用与青少年屈光不正的关系:近视 APP 研究。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Dec;128(12):1681-1688. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
7
Accuracy of a Smartphone-based Autorefractor Compared with Criterion-standard Refraction.基于智能手机的自动验光仪与标准验光法的准确性比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 2018 Dec;95(12):1135-1141. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001308.
8
Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia.评估一种临床像差仪的低阶精度和重复性、高阶重复性以及器械性近视。
Optometry. 2005 Aug;76(8):461-72. doi: 10.1016/j.optm.2005.07.006.
9
The child self-refraction study results from urban Chinese children in Guangzhou.广州城市汉族儿童的主观眼折射研究结果。
Ophthalmology. 2011 Jun;118(6):1162-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.003. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
10
Comparison of spherical equivalent refraction and astigmatism measured with three different models of autorefractors.三种不同型号自动验光仪测量的等效球镜度和散光的比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Jan;81(1):56-61. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200401000-00011.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of smartphone technology for detection of paediatric ocular diseases-a systematic review.智能手机技术用于检测儿童眼部疾病的有效性——一项系统评价
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 May 30;25(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04160-2.
2
Evaluation of Portable, Low-Cost Autorefractor in School Students with Limited Eye Care Access in Northeastern Brazil.巴西东北部眼保健服务有限的在校学生便携式低成本自动验光仪评估
Vision (Basel). 2025 Feb 27;9(1):17. doi: 10.3390/vision9010017.
3
Increasing myopia in Scotland at age of 3.5-5.5 years: A retrospective epidemiological study.

本文引用的文献

1
Design, methodology, and baseline of whole city-million scale children and adolescents myopia survey (CAMS) in Wenzhou, China.中国温州全市百万规模儿童青少年近视调查(CAMS)的设计、方法及基线情况
Eye Vis (Lond). 2021 Aug 19;8(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40662-021-00255-1.
2
Ophthalmology training in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.撒哈拉以南非洲的眼科培训:范围综述。
Eye (Lond). 2021 Apr;35(4):1066-1083. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-01335-7. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
3
Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.
苏格兰3.5至5.5岁儿童近视率上升:一项回顾性流行病学研究。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025 May;45(3):834-844. doi: 10.1111/opo.13461. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
4
Development and performance evaluation of a Bengali-adapted mHealth app for early detection of impaired visual acuity.一款用于早期检测视力受损的孟加拉语适配移动健康应用程序的开发与性能评估。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 3;10(23):e40853. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40853. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
5
Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening.使用智能手机进行主观屈光测试进行视力筛查。
J Vis Exp. 2024 Oct 18(212). doi: 10.3791/67506.
6
Assessment of Eye Care Apps for Children and Adolescents Based on the Mobile App Rating Scale: Content Analysis and Quality Assessment.基于移动应用评级量表评估儿童和青少年眼保健应用:内容分析和质量评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Sep 13;12:e53805. doi: 10.2196/53805.
7
Using Smartphones to Enhance Vision Screening in Rural Areas: Pilot Study.利用智能手机加强农村地区视力筛查:试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Apr 4;8:e55270. doi: 10.2196/55270.
2020 年失明和视力障碍的原因及 30 多年来的趋势,以及与 VISION 2020:看见的权利相关的可避免盲的患病率:全球疾病负担研究的分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e144-e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
4
The profile of astigmatism in 6-12-year-old children in Iran.伊朗 6-12 岁儿童散光特征。
J Optom. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
5
Comparing the Netra smartphone refractor to subjective refraction.比较 Netra 智能手机折射仪与主观折射。
Clin Exp Optom. 2020 Jul;103(4):501-506. doi: 10.1111/cxo.13003. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
6
Intraocular pressure and myopia progression in Chinese children: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study.中国儿童的眼压与近视进展:安阳儿童眼研究。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;103(3):349-354. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311831. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
7
Global prevalence of visual impairment associated with myopic macular degeneration and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050: systematic review, meta-analysis and modelling.全球与近视性黄斑变性相关的视力障碍患病率及 2000 年至 2050 年的时间趋势:系统评价、荟萃分析和建模。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;102(7):855-862. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311266. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
8
Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球失明和远距离视力损伤原因 1990-2020:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Dec;5(12):e1221-e1234. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
9
The epidemics of myopia: Aetiology and prevention.近视的流行:病因与预防。
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018 Jan;62:134-149. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
10
A review of proximal inputs to the near response.对近反射的近端输入的综述。
Clin Exp Optom. 2016 Jan;99(1):30-8. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12301.