Department of Ophthalmology and Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands; The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
Department of Ophthalmology and Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands; Orthoptics and Optometry, University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ophthalmology. 2021 Dec;128(12):1681-1688. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
To investigate the association between smartphone use and refractive error in teenagers using the Myopia app.
Cross-sectional population-based study.
A total of 525 teenagers 12 to 16 years of age from 6 secondary schools and from the birth cohort study Generation R participated.
A smartphone application (Myopia app; Innovattic) was designed to measure smartphone use and face-to-screen distance objectively and to pose questions about outdoor exposure. Participants underwent cycloplegic refractive error and ocular biometry measurements. Mean daily smartphone use was calculated in hours per day and continuous use as the number of episodes of 20 minutes on screen without breaks. Linear mixed models were conducted with smartphone use, continuous use, and face-to-screen distance as determinants and spherical equivalent of refraction (SER) and axial length-to-corneal radius (AL:CR) ratio as outcome measures stratified by median outdoor exposure.
Spherical equivalent of refraction in diopters and AL:CR ratio.
The teenagers on average were 13.7 ± 0.85 years of age, and myopia prevalence was 18.9%. During school days, total smartphone use on average was 3.71 ± 1.70 hours/day and was associated only borderline significantly with AL:CR ratio (β = 0.008; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.001 to 0.017) and not with SER. Continuous use on average was 6.42 ± 4.36 episodes of 20-minute use without breaks per day and was associated significantly with SER and AL:CR ratio (β = -0.07 [95% CI, -0.13 to -0.01] and β = 0.004 [95% CI, 0.001-0.008], respectively). When stratifying for outdoor exposure, continuous use remained significant only for teenagers with low exposure (β = -0.10 [95% CI, -0.20 to -0.01] and β = 0.007 [95% CI, 0.001-0.013] for SER and AL:CR ratio, respectively). Smartphone use during weekends was not associated significantly with SER and AL:CR ratio, nor was face-to-screen distance.
Dutch teenagers spent almost 4 hours per day on their smartphones. Episodes of 20 minutes of continuous use were associated with more myopic refractive errors, particularly in those with low outdoor exposure. This study suggested that frequent breaks should become a recommendation for smartphone use in teenagers. Future large longitudinal studies will allow more detailed information on safe screen use in youth.
使用 Myopia 应用程序研究智能手机使用与青少年屈光不正之间的关联。
横断面基于人群的研究。
共有 6 所中学和出生队列研究 Generation R 的 525 名 12 至 16 岁的青少年参与了研究。
设计了一个智能手机应用程序(Myopia app;Innovattic),用于客观测量智能手机使用情况和面部与屏幕之间的距离,并提出有关户外活动的问题。参与者接受了睫状肌麻痹屈光不正和眼生物测量测量。平均每天的智能手机使用时间以小时/天为单位进行计算,连续使用时间以 20 分钟不间断使用屏幕的次数计算。使用线性混合模型,以智能手机使用、连续使用和面部与屏幕之间的距离为决定因素,以球镜等效值(SER)和眼轴与角膜半径比(AL:CR)为因变量,对中位数户外活动暴露情况进行分层。
屈光度的球镜等效值和 AL:CR 比值。
青少年的平均年龄为 13.7 ± 0.85 岁,近视患病率为 18.9%。在上学日,平均每天的总智能手机使用时间为 3.71 ± 1.70 小时,与 AL:CR 比值仅呈边缘显著相关(β=0.008;95%置信区间[CI],-0.001 至 0.017),而与 SER 无关。平均每天连续使用时间为 6.42 ± 4.36 次 20 分钟不间断使用屏幕的次数,与 SER 和 AL:CR 比值显著相关(β=-0.07[95%CI,-0.13 至 -0.01]和β=0.004[95%CI,0.001-0.008])。当按户外活动暴露情况分层时,仅在户外活动暴露水平较低的青少年中,连续使用时间仍具有显著意义(β=-0.10[95%CI,-0.20 至 -0.01]和β=0.007[95%CI,0.001-0.013],分别用于 SER 和 AL:CR 比值)。周末的智能手机使用时间与 SER 和 AL:CR 比值无显著相关性,面部与屏幕的距离也无显著相关性。
荷兰青少年每天花在智能手机上的时间将近 4 个小时。连续 20 分钟的使用时间与更近视的屈光不正有关,尤其是在户外活动暴露水平较低的青少年中。这项研究表明,青少年在使用智能手机时应经常休息,这应成为一项建议。未来的大型纵向研究将提供有关青少年安全屏幕使用的更详细信息。