• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期基于 MRI 的定量结果与 ACL 手术后 6 至 24 个月的正向功能表现轨迹相关。

Early MRI-based quantitative outcomes are associated with a positive functional performance trajectory from 6 to 24 months post-ACL surgery.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 May;31(5):1690-1698. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07000-8. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00167-022-07000-8
PMID:35704062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9751233/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) has been used to determine the failure properties of ACL grafts and native ACL repairs and/or restorations. How these properties relate to future clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes remain unknown. The study objective was to investigate the relationship between non-contemporaneous qMRI measures and traditional outcome measures following Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration (BEAR). It was hypothesized that qMRI parameters at 6 months would be associated with clinical, functional, and/or patient-reported outcomes at 6 months, 24 months, and changes from 6 to 24 months post-surgery.

METHODS

Data of BEAR patients (n = 65) from a randomized control trial of BEAR versus ACL reconstruction (BEAR II Trial; NCT02664545) were utilized retrospectively for the present analysis. Images were acquired using the Constructive Interference in Steady State (CISS) sequence at 6 months post-surgery. Single-leg hop test ratios, arthrometric knee laxity values, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scores were determined at 6 and 24 months post-surgery. The associations between traditional outcomes and MRI measures of normalized signal intensity, mean cross-sectional area (CSA), volume, and estimated failure load of the healing ACL were evaluated based on bivariate correlations and multivariable regression analyses, which considered the potential effects of age, sex, and body mass index.

RESULTS

CSA (r = 0.44, p = 0.01), volume (r = 0.44, p = 0.01), and estimated failure load (r = 0.48, p = 0.01) at 6 months were predictive of the change in single-leg hop ratio from 6 to 24 months in bivariate analysis. CSA (β = 0.42, p = 0.01), volume (β = 0.42, p = 0.01), and estimated failure load (β = 0.48, p = 0.01) remained significant predictors when considering the demographic variables. No significant associations were observed between MRI variables and either knee laxity or IKDC when adjusting for demographic variables. Signal intensity was also not significant at any timepoint.

CONCLUSION

The qMRI-based measures of CSA, volume, and estimated failure load were predictive of a positive functional outcome trajectory from 6 to 24 months post-surgery. These variables measured using qMRI at 6 months post-surgery could serve as prospective markers of the functional outcome trajectory from 6 to 24 months post-surgery, aiding in rehabilitation programming and return-to-sport decisions to improve surgical outcomes and reduce the risk of reinjury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

摘要

目的

定量磁共振成像(qMRI)已被用于确定 ACL 移植物和 ACL 修复物/重建物的失效特性。这些特性与未来的临床、功能和患者报告的结果之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是探讨 Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration(BEAR)后非同期 qMRI 测量值与传统结局测量值之间的关系。假设 6 个月时的 qMRI 参数与术后 6、24 个月时的临床、功能和/或患者报告的结局以及从 6 个月到 24 个月的变化有关。

方法

回顾性分析了 BEAR 与 ACL 重建(BEAR II 试验;NCT02664545)的随机对照试验中 BEAR 患者(n=65)的数据,用于本分析。在手术后 6 个月时使用 Constructive Interference in Steady State(CISS)序列获取图像。在术后 6 和 24 个月时,测定单腿跳跃试验比值、关节内松弛值和国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观评分。基于双变量相关性和多变量回归分析,评估传统结局与愈合 ACL 的标准化信号强度、平均横截面积(CSA)、体积和估计失效负荷的 MRI 测量值之间的相关性,同时考虑年龄、性别和体重指数的潜在影响。

结果

在双变量分析中,6 个月时 CSA(r=0.44,p=0.01)、体积(r=0.44,p=0.01)和估计失效负荷(r=0.48,p=0.01)与 6 至 24 个月时单腿跳跃比的变化相关。在考虑人口统计学变量时,CSA(β=0.42,p=0.01)、体积(β=0.42,p=0.01)和估计失效负荷(β=0.48,p=0.01)仍然是显著的预测因子。当调整人口统计学变量时,MRI 变量与膝关节松弛度或 IKDC 之间没有显著相关性。在任何时间点,信号强度均不显著。

结论

6 个月时基于 qMRI 的 CSA、体积和估计失效负荷的测量值可预测术后 6 至 24 个月的功能结局轨迹。术后 6 个月时使用 qMRI 测量的这些变量可以作为术后 6 至 24 个月功能结局轨迹的前瞻性标志物,有助于康复计划和重返运动的决策,以改善手术结果并降低再次受伤的风险。

证据水平

II 级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c69/9751233/4bf684dab4e9/nihms-1815860-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c69/9751233/2cadb2c56e11/nihms-1815860-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c69/9751233/4bf684dab4e9/nihms-1815860-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c69/9751233/2cadb2c56e11/nihms-1815860-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c69/9751233/4bf684dab4e9/nihms-1815860-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Early MRI-based quantitative outcomes are associated with a positive functional performance trajectory from 6 to 24 months post-ACL surgery.早期基于 MRI 的定量结果与 ACL 手术后 6 至 24 个月的正向功能表现轨迹相关。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 May;31(5):1690-1698. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07000-8. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
2
Quantitative MRI Biomarkers to Predict Risk of Reinjury Within 2 Years After Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration.定量 MRI 生物标志物预测 ACL 桥增强修复后 2 年内再损伤的风险。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Feb;51(2):413-421. doi: 10.1177/03635465221142323. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
3
Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Is Not Inferior to Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 2 Years: Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.桥接增强前交叉韧带修复并不逊于自体移植物前交叉韧带重建 2 年的结果:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 May;48(6):1305-1315. doi: 10.1177/0363546520913532. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
4
Females Have Earlier Muscle Strength and Functional Recovery After Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.女性在桥接增强前交叉韧带修复后具有更早的肌肉力量和功能恢复。
Tissue Eng Part A. 2020 Jul;26(13-14):702-711. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0057. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
5
Report of the Clinical and Functional Primary Outcomes in Men of the ACL-SPORTS Trial: Similar Outcomes in Men Receiving Secondary Prevention With and Without Perturbation Training 1 and 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction.前交叉韧带运动损伤(ACL-SPORTS)试验男性患者临床及功能主要结局报告:ACL重建术后1年和2年接受或未接受扰动训练1和2进行二级预防的男性患者结局相似。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2523-2534. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5280-2.
6
Predictors of Healing Ligament Size and Magnetic Resonance Signal Intensity at 6 Months After Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.桥接增强前交叉韧带修复后 6 个月愈合韧带大小和磁共振信号强度的预测因素。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1361-1369. doi: 10.1177/0363546519836087. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
7
Changes in Cross-sectional Area and Signal Intensity of Healing Anterior Cruciate Ligaments and Grafts in the First 2 Years After Surgery.术后 2 年内愈合前交叉韧带和移植物的横截面积和信号强度变化。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;47(8):1831-1843. doi: 10.1177/0363546519850572. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
8
Predictive parameters for return to pre-injury level of sport 6 months following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.前交叉韧带重建手术后6个月恢复至伤前运动水平的预测参数。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Dec;23(12):3623-31. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3261-5. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
9
Comparison of Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Structures to Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis at 2-Year Follow-up.2 年随访比较前交叉韧带和前外侧结构的初次修复与重建和外侧关节外腱固定术。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jul;51(9):2300-2312. doi: 10.1177/03635465231178301. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
10
Younger Patients and Men Achieve Higher Outcome Scores Than Older Patients and Women After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后,年轻患者和男性比老年患者和女性获得更高的结果评分。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2472-2480. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5418-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes of Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration (BEAR).桥接增强前交叉韧带重建术(BEAR)的适应症、技术及结果
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2025 Apr;18(4):140-148. doi: 10.1007/s12178-025-09950-1. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
2
Association of Anterior Knee Pain With Extension Deficit After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.前交叉韧带重建术后前膝痛与伸直受限的关联:一项系统评价
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Oct 24;12(10):23259671241265840. doi: 10.1177/23259671241265840. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Comprehensive evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging sequences for signal intensity based assessment of anterior cruciate ligament healing following surgical treatment.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comprehensive Framework to Evaluate the Effects of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction on Graft and Cartilage Status through the Analysis of MRI T2 Relaxation Time and Knee Laxity: A Pilot Study.通过分析MRI T2弛豫时间和膝关节松弛度评估前交叉韧带损伤与重建对移植物和软骨状态影响的综合框架:一项初步研究
Life (Basel). 2021 Dec 10;11(12):1383. doi: 10.3390/life11121383.
2
Earlier Resolution of Symptoms and Return of Function After Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair As Compared With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.与前交叉韧带重建相比,桥接增强型前交叉韧带修复术后症状的早期缓解和功能恢复
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Nov 9;9(11):23259671211052530. doi: 10.1177/23259671211052530. eCollection 2021 Nov.
3
基于磁共振成像信号强度的前交叉韧带术后愈合情况的综合评估。
J Orthop Res. 2024 Jul;42(7):1587-1598. doi: 10.1002/jor.25802. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
4
Assessment of ultrashort echo time (UTE) T* mapping at 3T for the whole knee: repeatability, the effects of fat suppression, and knee position.3T 下全膝关节超短回波时间(UTE)T* 映射成像的评估:可重复性、脂肪抑制效果及膝关节位置
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Dec 1;13(12):7893-7909. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-459. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
5
LigaNET: A multi-modal deep learning approach to predict the risk of subsequent anterior cruciate ligament injury after surgery.LigaNET:一种用于预测手术后后续前交叉韧带损伤风险的多模态深度学习方法。
medRxiv. 2023 Jul 27:2023.07.25.23293102. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.25.23293102.
6
Predicting anterior cruciate ligament failure load with T* relaxometry and machine learning as a prospective imaging biomarker for revision surgery.利用 T* 弛豫度和机器学习预测前交叉韧带失效负荷,作为翻修手术的前瞻性影像学生物标志物。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 2;13(1):3524. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30637-5.
Regional Differences in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Signal Intensity After Surgical Treatment.术后前交叉韧带信号强度的区域性差异。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Dec;49(14):3833-3841. doi: 10.1177/03635465211047554. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
4
Association of Jump-Landing Biomechanics With Tibiofemoral Articular Cartilage Composition 12 Months After ACL Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后12个月跳跃着陆生物力学与胫股关节软骨成分的关联
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 21;9(7):23259671211016424. doi: 10.1177/23259671211016424. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
Visualizing pre-osteoarthritis: Integrating MRI UTE-T2* with mechanics and biology to combat osteoarthritis-The 2019 Elizabeth Winston Lanier Kappa Delta Award.可视化骨关节炎前期:将 MRI UTE-T2*与力学和生物学相结合以防治骨关节炎——2019 年伊丽莎白·温斯顿·莱尼尔·卡帕三角洲奖。
J Orthop Res. 2021 Aug;39(8):1585-1595. doi: 10.1002/jor.25045. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
6
Automated magnetic resonance image segmentation of the anterior cruciate ligament.自动磁共振成像前交叉韧带分割。
J Orthop Res. 2021 Apr;39(4):831-840. doi: 10.1002/jor.24926. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
7
The Affect of Patient Sex and Graft Type on Postoperative Functional Outcomes After Primary ACL Reconstruction.患者性别和移植物类型对初次前交叉韧带重建术后功能结果的影响。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jun 23;8(6):2325967120926052. doi: 10.1177/2325967120926052. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Is Not Inferior to Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 2 Years: Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.桥接增强前交叉韧带修复并不逊于自体移植物前交叉韧带重建 2 年的结果:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 May;48(6):1305-1315. doi: 10.1177/0363546520913532. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
9
Multiparametric MR imaging reveals early cartilage degeneration at 2 and 8 weeks after ACL transection in a rabbit model.多参数磁共振成像显示兔 ACL 切断后 2 周和 8 周时早期软骨退变。
J Orthop Res. 2020 Sep;38(9):1974-1986. doi: 10.1002/jor.24644. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
10
Quantitative imaging of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft demonstrates longitudinal compositional changes and relationships with clinical outcomes at 2 years after ACL reconstruction.前交叉韧带(ACL)移植物的定量成像显示,在 ACL 重建 2 年后,其具有纵向组成变化,并与临床结果相关。
J Orthop Res. 2020 Jun;38(6):1289-1295. doi: 10.1002/jor.24572. Epub 2020 Jan 5.