Department of Orthopaedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital, Coro West, Suite 402, 1 Hoppin St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 2;13(1):3524. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30637-5.
Non-invasive methods to document healing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) structural properties could potentially identify patients at risk for revision surgery. The objective was to evaluate machine learning models to predict ACL failure load from magnetic resonance images (MRI) and to determine if those predictions were related to revision surgery incidence. It was hypothesized that the optimal model would demonstrate a lower mean absolute error (MAE) than the benchmark linear regression model, and that patients with a lower estimated failure load would have higher revision incidence 2 years post-surgery. Support vector machine, random forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and linear regression models were trained using MRI T* relaxometry and ACL tensile testing data from minipigs (n = 65). The lowest MAE model was used to estimate ACL failure load for surgical patients at 9 months post-surgery (n = 46) and dichotomized into low and high score groups via Youden's J statistic to compare revision incidence. Significance was set at alpha = 0.05. The random forest model decreased the failure load MAE by 55% (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: p = 0.01) versus the benchmark. The low score group had a higher revision incidence (21% vs. 5%; Chi-square test: p = 0.09). ACL structural property estimates via MRI may provide a biomarker for clinical decision making.
非侵入性方法可用于记录前交叉韧带 (ACL) 的愈合结构特性,从而有可能确定需要接受翻修手术的患者。本研究旨在评估机器学习模型能否根据磁共振成像 (MRI) 预测 ACL 失效负荷,并确定这些预测是否与翻修手术发生率有关。研究假设,最优模型的平均绝对误差 (MAE) 应低于基准线性回归模型,并且预计失效负荷较低的患者在术后 2 年内的翻修发生率更高。使用来自小型猪的 MRI T*弛豫度和 ACL 拉伸测试数据对支持向量机、随机森林、AdaBoost、XGBoost 和线性回归模型进行了训练(n=65)。使用具有最低 MAE 的模型对术后 9 个月的手术患者进行 ACL 失效负荷预测(n=46),并通过 Youden's J 统计量将其分为低评分组和高评分组,以比较翻修发生率。显著性水平设为α=0.05。与基准相比,随机森林模型将失效负荷 MAE 降低了 55%(Wilcoxon 符号秩检验:p=0.01)。低评分组的翻修发生率更高(21%比 5%;卡方检验:p=0.09)。MRI 对 ACL 结构特性的评估可能为临床决策提供生物标志物。