Suppr超能文献

干预措施对中年和老年颈痛人群的效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。

Effectiveness of interventions for middle-aged and ageing population with neck pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.

Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Research Unit, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 15;12(6):e060373. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060373.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Neck pain (NP) is a common musculoskeletal complaint and is increasing in prevalence. Current clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews recommended conservative, pharmacological and invasive interventions for individuals with NP. However, optimal management specifically for those who are middle-aged or older adults (≥45 years) is not available; and important considering our ageing population.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted following the Cochrane guidelines. Eligibility criteria include randomised controlled/clinical trials evaluating any of acute (<3 months) or chronic (≥3 months) non-specific NP, whiplash associated disorders, cervical radiculopathy and cervicogenic headache. Any interventions and outcome measures detailed within The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains will be included. Two independent reviewers will search key databases (AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PEDro and PsycINFO), grey literature, key journals and reference lists in May 2022. Two reviewers will decide eligibility and assess risk of bias (ROB) of included studies. The kappa statistic will be used to evaluate agreement between the reviewers at each stage. Data will be extracted by one reviewer and checked for accuracy by a second reviewer. Descriptive data and ROB will be summarised and tabulated. Traditional pairwise meta-analysis using random-effect model will be performed for all direct comparisons, and NMA using a frequentist random-effect model then performed based on NP classification where possible. A network of traditional pairwise meta-analysis allows comparisons of multiple interventions from both direct and indirect evidence to provide a hierarchal establishment for enhancing decision making of clinical practitioners.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethic approval is not required as the study is a literature review. The findings will be shared with the national and international researchers, healthcare professionals and the general public through publishing in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021284618.

摘要

简介

颈部疼痛(NP)是一种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,其发病率正在上升。目前的临床实践指南和系统评价建议对 NP 患者采用保守、药物和侵入性干预措施。然而,对于中年或老年人(≥45 岁),目前尚无最佳治疗方法;考虑到我们的老龄化人口,这一点尤为重要。

方法和分析

我们将按照 Cochrane 指南进行系统评价和网络荟萃分析(NMA)。纳入标准包括评估急性(<3 个月)或慢性(≥3 个月)非特异性 NP、挥鞭伤相关疾病、颈神经根病和颈源性头痛的任何随机对照/临床试验。将包括国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)详细描述的任何干预措施和结果测量。两位独立评审员将于 2022 年 5 月检索 AMED、CENTRAL、CINAHL、Embase、MEDLINE、PEDro 和 PsycINFO 等主要数据库、灰色文献、主要期刊和参考文献列表。两位评审员将决定纳入研究的资格和评估偏倚风险(ROB)。将使用 Kappa 统计量评估评审员在每个阶段的一致性。数据将由一位评审员提取,并由第二位评审员检查准确性。将对描述性数据和 ROB 进行总结和制表。将对所有直接比较进行传统的成对荟萃分析,使用随机效应模型;并根据 NP 分类,尽可能使用基于似然的随机效应模型进行 NMA。传统的成对荟萃分析网络允许对来自直接和间接证据的多种干预措施进行比较,为临床医生的决策提供层次结构。

伦理与传播

由于本研究是文献综述,因此不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过在同行评议期刊上发表和在会议上发表来与国内外研究人员、医疗保健专业人员和公众分享。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021284618。

相似文献

6
Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers.用于治疗压疮的敷料和外用剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6(6):CD011947. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011947.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Neck pain with radiculopathy: A systematic review of classification systems.神经根病性颈痛的分类系统:系统评价。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021 Aug;54:102389. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102389. Epub 2021 May 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验