• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计并评估一种用于局部晚期或局部复发性直肠癌患者的患者决策辅助工具:一项全国多中心混合方法研究方案。

Designing and evaluating a patient decision aid for patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national multicentre mixed methods study protocol.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Swansea University Health Board, Swansea, UK

The School of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 15;12(6):e056984. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056984.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056984
PMID:35705344
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9204455/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 5%-10% of new rectal cancers are locally advanced (locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)) at presentation with 4%-8% recurring (locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC)) after initial treatment. Patients with potentially curable disease have to consider many trade-offs when considering major exenterative surgery. There are no decision tools for these patients and current resources have found to not meet minimum international standards. The overall aim of this study is to produce a validated patient decision aid (PtDA) to assist patients considering radical pelvic exenteration for LARC and LRRC created in line with international minimum standards.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a national, multicentre mixed methods project and has been designed in keeping with guidance from the International Patient Decision Aids Standard.This study is in four stages. In stage 1, we will develop the PtDA and its content using agile developmental methodology. In stage 2, we will assess the content and face validity of the PtDA using mixed-methods with key stakeholders. In stage 3, we will assess the feasibility and efficacy of the PtDA. In stage 4, we will establish the barriers and facilitators to the use of a PtDA in the outpatient setting. Questionnaires including the QQ-10, EORTC PATSAT-C33, Preparation for Decision-Making Scale and the NoMAD survey will be analysed during the study. Interviews will be analysed using thematic analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Research ethics approval from North of Scotland Research Ethics Service 19/NS/0056 (IRAS 257890) has been granted. Results will be published in open access peer-reviewed journals, presented in conferences and distributed through bowel research UK charity. External endorsement will be sought from the International Patient Decision Standards Collaboration inventory of PtDAs.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019122933.

摘要

简介

大约有 5%-10%的新发直肠癌在初诊时已处于局部晚期(局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)),而在初始治疗后,有 4%-8%的患者会出现局部复发(局部复发性直肠癌(LRRC))。对于具有潜在治愈可能的患者,在考虑进行主要的根治性切除术时,需要考虑许多权衡因素。目前,这些患者没有决策工具,而且现有的资源也不符合最低国际标准。本研究的总体目标是制作一种经过验证的患者决策辅助工具(PtDA),以帮助考虑对 LARC 和 LRRC 进行根治性骨盆切除术的患者,同时符合国际最低标准。

方法和分析

这是一项全国性的、多中心的混合方法研究,其设计符合国际患者决策辅助工具标准的指导原则。本研究分为四个阶段。在第 1 阶段,我们将使用敏捷开发方法来开发 PtDA 及其内容。在第 2 阶段,我们将使用混合方法,结合关键利益相关者,评估 PtDA 的内容和表面有效性。在第 3 阶段,我们将评估 PtDA 的可行性和效果。在第 4 阶段,我们将确定在门诊环境中使用 PtDA 的障碍和促进因素。在研究过程中,我们将分析包括 QQ-10、EORTC PATSAT-C33、决策准备量表和 NoMAD 调查在内的问卷。访谈将采用主题分析法进行分析。

伦理和传播

已获得苏格兰北部研究伦理服务处 19/NS/0056(IRAS 257890)的研究伦理批准。研究结果将在开放获取的同行评议期刊上发表,在会议上展示,并通过英国肠道研究慈善机构分发。将寻求国际患者决策标准协作库存的 PtDA 来对其进行外部认可。

前瞻性注册编号

CRD42019122933。

相似文献

1
Designing and evaluating a patient decision aid for patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer: a national multicentre mixed methods study protocol.设计并评估一种用于局部晚期或局部复发性直肠癌患者的患者决策辅助工具:一项全国多中心混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 15;12(6):e056984. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056984.
2
Development and evaluation of a patient decision aid for patients considering ongoing medical or surgical treatment options for ulcerative colitis using a mixed-methods approach: protocol for DISCUSS study.采用混合方法研究开发和评估溃疡性结肠炎患者考虑持续医学或手术治疗选择的患者决策辅助工具:DISCUSS 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 14;10(1):e031845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031845.
3
Observational study of the development and evaluation of a fertility preservation patient decision aid for teenage and adult women diagnosed with cancer: the Cancer, Fertility and Me research protocol.针对被诊断患有癌症的青少年及成年女性的生育力保存患者决策辅助工具的开发与评估的观察性研究:癌症、生育力与我研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 13;7(3):e013219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013219.
4
Development of a risk prediction tool for patients with locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer undergoing pelvic exenteration: protocol for a mixed-methods study.局部晚期和复发性直肠癌患者行盆腔廓清术的风险预测工具的开发:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 30;13(8):e075304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075304.
5
The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice.直肠癌决策辅助工具的评估及其在临床实践中实施的影响因素。
BMC Surg. 2014 Mar 21;14:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-16.
6
Effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for patients with generalised anxiety disorder: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.基于网络的广泛性焦虑症患者决策辅助工具的有效性:一项随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 10;10(12):e039956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039956.
7
Development and usability testing of a patient decision aid for newly diagnosed relapsing multiple sclerosis patients.新发复发型多发性硬化症患者决策辅助工具的开发与可用性测试
BMC Neurol. 2019 Jul 20;19(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1382-7.
8
Quality of internet information to aid patient decision making in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer.用于辅助局部晚期和复发性直肠癌患者决策的互联网信息质量
Surgeon. 2022 Dec;20(6):e382-e391. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.12.008. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
9
Development of a web-based patient decision aid for initiating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs using user-centred design methods.使用以用户为中心的设计方法开发一种基于网络的患者决策辅助工具,用于启动改善病情抗风湿药物治疗。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0433-5.
10
A 'combined framework' approach to developing a patient decision aid: the PANDAs model.一种用于开发患者决策辅助工具的“综合框架”方法:熊猫模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 24;14:503. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0503-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A Prospective Observational Cohort Study Comparing High-Complexity Against Conventional Pelvic Exenteration Surgery.一项比较高复杂性盆腔廓清术与传统盆腔廓清术的前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 1;17(1):111. doi: 10.3390/cancers17010111.
2
A systematic review of oncosurgical and quality of life outcomes following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer.局部晚期和复发性直肠癌盆腔廓清术后肿瘤外科治疗及生活质量结果的系统评价
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025 Jan;107(1):2-11. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0031. Epub 2024 Feb 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of internet information to aid patient decision making in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer.用于辅助局部晚期和复发性直肠癌患者决策的互联网信息质量
Surgeon. 2022 Dec;20(6):e382-e391. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.12.008. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
2
Do Personal Stories Make Patient Decision Aids More Effective? An Update from the International Patient Decision Aids Standards.个人故事是否使患者决策辅助工具更有效?来自国际患者决策辅助标准的更新。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):897-906. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211011100. Epub 2021 May 22.
3
Guidance and/or Decision Coaching with Patient Decision Aids: Scoping Reviews to Inform the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS).指导和/或决策辅导与患者决策辅助工具:范围综述为国际患者决策辅助标准(IPDAS)提供信息。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):938-953. doi: 10.1177/0272989X21997330. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
4
Systematic review of outcomes following pelvic exenteration for the treatment of primary and recurrent locally advanced rectal cancer.系统评价盆腔廓清术治疗原发性和复发性局部晚期直肠癌的疗效。
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Nov;22(11):835-845. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1883-1. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
5
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
6
The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL).内容和表面有效性在工具开发中的重要性:从服务使用者在开发“恢复生活质量量表”(ReQoL)时吸取的经验教训。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1893-1902. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1847-y. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
7
Impact of Recurrence and Salvage Surgery on Survival After Multidisciplinary Treatment of Rectal Cancer.复发与挽救性手术对直肠癌多学科治疗后生存的影响
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 10;35(23):2631-2638. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.72.1464. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
8
Montgomery and informed consent: where are we now?蒙哥马利案与知情同意:我们如今处于何种境地?
BMJ. 2017 May 12;357:j2224. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2224.
9
Changes in treatment patterns for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in the United States over the past decade: An analysis from the National Cancer Data Base.过去十年美国局部晚期直肠癌患者治疗模式的变化:来自国家癌症数据库的分析
Cancer. 2016 Jul 1;122(13):1996-2003. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29993. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
10
Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? A critical review of theory and evidence.个人故事是否使患者决策辅助工具更有效?理论与证据的批判性回顾。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S9. Epub 2013 Nov 29.