Suppr超能文献

谨慎影响回避和趋近行为的方式不同。

Caution Influences Avoidance and Approach Behaviors Differently.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut 06001.

Department of Neuroscience, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut 06001

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2022 Jul 27;42(30):5899-5915. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1892-21.2022. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

Abstract

While conflict between incompatible goals has well-known effects on actions, in many situations the same action may produce harmful or beneficial consequences during different periods in a nonconflicting manner, e.g., crossing the street during a red or green light. To avoid harm, subjects must be cautious to inhibit the action specifically when it is punished, as in passive avoidance, but act when it is beneficial, as in active avoidance or active approach. In mice of both sexes performing a signaled action to avoid harm or obtain reward, we found that addition of a new rule that punishes the action when it occurs unsignaled delays the timing of the signaled action in an apparent sign of increased caution. Caution depended on task signaling, contingency, and reinforcement type. Interestingly, caution became persistent when the signaled action was avoidance motivated by danger but was only transient when it was approach motivated by reward. Although caution is represented by the activity of neurons in the midbrain, it developed independent of frontal cortex or basal ganglia output circuits. These results indicate that caution disrupts actions in different ways depending on the motivational state and may develop from unforeseen brain circuits. Actions, such as crossing the street at a light, can have benefits during one light signal (getting somewhere) but can be harmful during a different signal (being run over). Humans must be cautious to cross the street during the period marked by the appropriate signal. In mice performing a signaled action to avoid harm or obtain reward, we found that addition of a new rule that punishes the action when it occurs unsignaled, delays the timing of the signaled action in an apparent sign of increased caution. Caution became persistent when the signaled action was motivated by danger, but not when it was motivated by reward. Moreover, the development of caution did not depend on prototypical frontal cortex circuits.

摘要

虽然目标冲突对行为有众所周知的影响,但在许多情况下,同一行为在非冲突情况下可能在不同时期产生有害或有益的后果,例如,在红灯或绿灯时穿过街道。为了避免伤害,主体必须谨慎地在动作受到抑制时抑制动作,例如在被动回避中,但在动作有益时,例如在主动回避或主动接近中采取行动。在男女两性的老鼠中,执行一个有信号的动作来避免伤害或获得奖励,我们发现,增加一个新规则,即在没有信号时惩罚该动作,会导致有信号的动作的时间延迟,这显然表明谨慎程度增加。谨慎取决于任务信号、偶然性和强化类型。有趣的是,当信号驱动的动作是由危险引起的回避时,谨慎是持久的,但当信号驱动的动作是由奖励引起的接近时,谨慎是短暂的。虽然谨慎是由中脑神经元的活动来表示的,但它是独立于额叶皮层或基底神经节输出回路而发展起来的。这些结果表明,谨慎会根据动机状态以不同的方式破坏动作,并且可能是从意想不到的大脑回路中发展出来的。例如,在红灯时穿过街道可以在一个信号期间(到达目的地)获得好处,但在另一个信号期间(被车撞)可能会造成伤害。人类必须在适当的信号标记期间谨慎地过马路。在老鼠执行一个有信号的动作来避免伤害或获得奖励时,我们发现,增加一个新规则,即在没有信号时惩罚该动作,会导致有信号的动作的时间延迟,这显然表明谨慎程度增加。当信号驱动的动作是由危险引起的回避时,谨慎是持久的,但当信号驱动的动作是由奖励引起的接近时,谨慎是短暂的。此外,谨慎的发展并不依赖于典型的额叶皮层回路。

相似文献

1
Caution Influences Avoidance and Approach Behaviors Differently.谨慎影响回避和趋近行为的方式不同。
J Neurosci. 2022 Jul 27;42(30):5899-5915. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1892-21.2022. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
10
Basal Ganglia Output Controls Active Avoidance Behavior.基底神经节输出控制主动回避行为。
J Neurosci. 2016 Oct 5;36(40):10274-10284. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1842-16.2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamical prefrontal population coding during defensive behaviours.防御行为期间的动态前额叶群体编码
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7869):690-694. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03726-6. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
7
Pavlovian Control of Escape and Avoidance.巴甫洛夫式的逃避和回避控制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Oct;30(10):1379-1390. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01224. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
9
Basal Ganglia Output Controls Active Avoidance Behavior.基底神经节输出控制主动回避行为。
J Neurosci. 2016 Oct 5;36(40):10274-10284. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1842-16.2016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验