• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习开发并验证用于院外心脏骤停患者的可解释的院前自主循环恢复(P-ROSC)评分:一项回顾性研究

Development and validation of an interpretable prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (P-ROSC) score for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using machine learning: A retrospective study.

作者信息

Liu Nan, Liu Mingxuan, Chen Xinru, Ning Yilin, Lee Jin Wee, Siddiqui Fahad Javaid, Saffari Seyed Ehsan, Ho Andrew Fu Wah, Shin Sang Do, Ma Matthew Huei-Ming, Tanaka Hideharu, Ong Marcus Eng Hock

机构信息

Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore.

Health Services Research Centre, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2022 May 6;48:101422. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101422. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101422
PMID:35706500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9096672/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) before arrival at the emergency department is an early indicator of successful resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Several ROSC prediction scores have been developed with European cohorts, with unclear applicability in Asian settings. We aimed to develop an interpretable prehospital ROSC (P-ROSC) score for ROSC prediction based on patients with OHCA in Asia.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined patients who suffered from OHCA between Jan 1, 2009 and Jun 17, 2018 using data recorded in the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS) registry. AutoScore, an interpretable machine learning framework, was used to develop P-ROSC. On the same cohort, the P-ROSC was compared with two clinical scores, the RACA and the UB-ROSC. The predictive power was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic analysis.

FINDINGS

170,678 cases were included, of which 14,104 (8.26%) attained prehospital ROSC. The P-ROSC score identified a new variable, prehospital drug administration, which was not included in the RACA score or the UB-ROSC score. Using only five variables, the P-ROSC score achieved an AUC of 0.806 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.799-0.814), outperforming both RACA and UB-ROSC with AUCs of 0.773 (95% CI 0.765-0.782) and 0.728 (95% CI 0.718-0.738), respectively.

INTERPRETATION

The P-ROSC score is a practical and easily interpreted tool for predicting the probability of prehospital ROSC.

FUNDING

This research received funding from SingHealth Duke-NUS ACP Programme Funding (15/FY2020/P2/06-A79).

摘要

背景

在抵达急诊科之前恢复自主循环(ROSC)是院外心脏骤停(OHCA)复苏成功的早期指标。欧洲队列已经开发了几种ROSC预测评分,但在亚洲环境中的适用性尚不清楚。我们旨在基于亚洲OHCA患者开发一种可解释的院前ROSC(P-ROSC)评分,用于预测ROSC。

方法

这项回顾性研究使用泛亚复苏结局研究(PAROS)登记处记录的数据,检查了2009年1月1日至2018年6月17日期间发生OHCA的患者。使用可解释的机器学习框架AutoScore来开发P-ROSC。在同一队列中,将P-ROSC与两个临床评分RACA和UB-ROSC进行比较。在受试者工作特征分析中,使用曲线下面积(AUC)评估预测能力。

结果

纳入170,678例病例,其中14,104例(8.26%)实现了院前ROSC。P-ROSC评分确定了一个新变量,即院前药物给药,这在RACA评分或UB-ROSC评分中均未包括。仅使用五个变量,P-ROSC评分的AUC达到0.806(95%置信区间[CI]0.799-0.814),优于RACA和UB-ROSC,它们的AUC分别为0.773(95%CI0.765-0.782)和0.728(95%CI0.718-0.738)。

解读

P-ROSC评分是一种实用且易于解释的工具,用于预测院前ROSC的可能性。

资金

本研究获得新加坡健康城杜克-国大急性冠脉综合征项目基金(15/FY2020/P2/06-A79)的资助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98de/9096672/244bce4c938f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98de/9096672/7d1539368e90/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98de/9096672/e3250e860f80/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98de/9096672/244bce4c938f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98de/9096672/7d1539368e90/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98de/9096672/e3250e860f80/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98de/9096672/244bce4c938f/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of an interpretable prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (P-ROSC) score for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using machine learning: A retrospective study.使用机器学习开发并验证用于院外心脏骤停患者的可解释的院前自主循环恢复(P-ROSC)评分:一项回顾性研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 May 6;48:101422. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101422. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Development and validation of the SARICA score to predict survival after return of spontaneous circulation in out of hospital cardiac arrest using an interpretable machine learning framework.使用可解释机器学习框架开发和验证 SARICA 评分,以预测院外心脏骤停自主循环恢复后的生存率。
Resuscitation. 2022 Jan;170:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.11.029. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
3
Point-of-care testing for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitated at the ED to predict ROSC: Development and external validation of POC-ED-ROSC model.在 ED 对院外心脏骤停复苏的成人进行即时检测以预测 ROSC:POC-ED-ROSC 模型的开发和外部验证。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;71:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.06.022. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
4
End-tidal Carbon Dioxide + Return of Spontaneous Circulation After Cardiac Arrest (RACA) Score to Predict Outcomes After Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest.心肺复苏后呼气末二氧化碳与自主循环恢复(RACA)评分预测院外心脏骤停后结局。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Apr 4;24(3):605-614. doi: 10.5811/westjem.59005.
5
Validation of the ROSC after cardiac arrest (RACA) score in Pan-Asian out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.泛亚地区院外心脏骤停患者心脏骤停后自主循环恢复(ROSC)评分的验证
Resuscitation. 2020 Apr;149:53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.029. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
6
Decision tree model for predicting long-term outcomes in children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide, population-based observational study.预测院外心脏骤停儿童长期预后的决策树模型:一项基于全国人群的观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2014 Jun 27;18(3):R133. doi: 10.1186/cc13951.
7
Validation of the return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest (RACA) score in two different national territories.验证心脏骤停后自主循环恢复(RACA)评分在两个不同国家/地区的有效性。
Resuscitation. 2019 Jan;134:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
8
Validation of Utstein-Based score to predict return of spontaneous circulation (UB-ROSC) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.验证基于乌斯廷的评分系统(UB-ROSC)预测院外心脏骤停患者自主循环恢复的能力。
Resuscitation. 2024 Apr;197:110113. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110113. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
9
Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation at hospital arrival - survival and neurological outcome without extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.院外心搏骤停伴心肺复苏到达医院后持续发作 - 体外心肺复苏术对存活率和神经功能结局无影响。
Crit Care. 2018 Sep 29;22(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2176-9.
10
Identification of Factors Associated with Return of Spontaneous Circulation after Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Using Natural Language Processing.运用自然语言处理技术识别与儿科院外心脏骤停后自主循环恢复相关的因素。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(5):687-694. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2074180. Epub 2022 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of return of spontaneous circulation prediction scores in patients with cardiac arrest during ambulance transport.救护车转运期间心脏骤停患者自主循环恢复预测评分的比较
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01265-1.
2
P-ROSC, UB-ROSC, and RACA Scores in Predicting the Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort.院外心脏骤停中P-ROSC、UB-ROSC和RACA评分对自主循环恢复的预测:一项回顾性队列研究
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 17;13(1):e39. doi: 10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2631. eCollection 2025.
3
LC risk score - development and evaluation of a scale for assessing the risk of developing long COVID.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Assessment of an Interpretable Machine Learning Triage Tool for Estimating Mortality After Emergency Admissions.开发和评估一种可解释的机器学习分诊工具,用于估算急诊入院后的死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2118467. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18467.
2
Out of hospital cardiac arrest: Past, present, and future.院外心搏骤停:过去、现在和未来。
Resuscitation. 2021 Aug;165:101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
3
Swarm Learning for decentralized and confidential clinical machine learning.
长新冠风险评分——一种评估发生长新冠风险的量表的开发与评估
Arch Med Sci. 2024 Apr 21;21(1):121-130. doi: 10.5114/aoms/187781. eCollection 2025.
4
Application of Machine Learning for Patients With Cardiac Arrest: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器学习在心脏骤停患者中的应用:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 10;27:e67871. doi: 10.2196/67871.
5
Utilization of non-invasive ventilation before prehospital emergency anesthesia in trauma - a cohort analysis with machine learning.创伤患者院前紧急麻醉前无创通气的应用——一项基于机器学习的队列分析
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 3;33(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01350-1.
6
Which Matters More for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival: Witnessed Arrest or Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?对于院外心脏骤停存活而言,哪个因素更重要:有人目睹骤停还是旁观者心肺复苏?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Feb 18;14(4):e038427. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038427. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
7
External Validation and Comparison of Statistical and Machine Learning-Based Models in Predicting Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.基于统计和机器学习的模型在预测院外心脏骤停后结局中的外部验证和比较:一项多中心回顾性分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):e037088. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037088. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
8
The short- and mid-term mortality trends in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors: insights from a 5-year multicenter retrospective study in Taiwan.院外心脏骤停幸存者的短期和中期死亡率趋势:来自台湾一项为期5年的多中心回顾性研究的见解。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Aug 19;19:100747. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100747. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
The Current Discussion Regarding End-of-Life Care for Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Initial Non-Shockable Rhythm: A Narrative Review.关于初始非可电击心律的院外心脏骤停患者临终关怀的当前讨论:一项叙述性综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Mar 25;60(4):533. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040533.
10
Prediction Models for Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Patients with Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.心脏骤停患者自主循环恢复的预测模型:一项系统评价与批判性评估
Emerg Med Int. 2023 Nov 21;2023:6780941. doi: 10.1155/2023/6780941. eCollection 2023.
群体学习用于去中心化和保密的临床机器学习。
Nature. 2021 Jun;594(7862):265-270. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03583-3. Epub 2021 May 26.
4
Prediction of breakthrough pain during labour neuraxial analgesia: comparison of machine learning and multivariable regression approaches.预测分娩时椎管内镇痛的爆发性疼痛:机器学习和多变量回归方法的比较。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2021 Feb;45:99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
5
AutoScore: A Machine Learning-Based Automatic Clinical Score Generator and Its Application to Mortality Prediction Using Electronic Health Records.自动评分:一种基于机器学习的自动临床评分生成器及其在使用电子健康记录进行死亡率预测中的应用。
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Oct 21;8(10):e21798. doi: 10.2196/21798.
6
Clinical Predictive Models of Sudden Cardiac Arrest: A Survey of the Current Science and Analysis of Model Performances.临床心脏性猝死预测模型:当前科学调查与模型性能分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Aug 18;9(16):e017625. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.017625. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
7
Validation of the ROSC after cardiac arrest (RACA) score in Pan-Asian out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.泛亚地区院外心脏骤停患者心脏骤停后自主循环恢复(ROSC)评分的验证
Resuscitation. 2020 Apr;149:53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.029. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
8
An Utstein-based model score to predict survival to hospital admission: The UB-ROSC score.一种基于Utstein的预测入院存活率的模型评分:UB-ROSC评分。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;308:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.01.032. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
9
Validation of the return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest (RACA) score in two different national territories.验证心脏骤停后自主循环恢复(RACA)评分在两个不同国家/地区的有效性。
Resuscitation. 2019 Jan;134:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
10
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: current concepts.院外心脏骤停:当前概念。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 10;391(10124):970-979. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30472-0.