Berenstein I
Int J Psychoanal. 1987;68 ( Pt 1):21-35.
The author reviews 'Analysis terminable and interminable' and traces the similarities to and differences from the situation fifty years ago, discussing Freud's personal circumstances in 1937 and the circumstances of the psychoanalytical movement and concentrating on the relationship with Ferenczi; a consideration of social and political circumstances and some of the points dealt with in Freud's eight sections from the standpoint of today. He discusses the various possible connotations of the terms 'terminable' and 'interminable'. Other terms that could be used coincide only partially: finite and infinite; capable of being worked through and not capable of being worked through; expressible and inexpressible; finished and unfinished; possible and impossible. The author considers new circumstances for the practice of psychoanalysis in situations of social trauma which raise the question of analysis possible and impossible. Finally, an attempt is made to arrive at a provisional definition of the conditions under which analysis may be regarded as terminable or interminable.
作者回顾了《可终止的与不可终止的分析》,追溯了与五十年前情况的异同,讨论了1937年弗洛伊德的个人境遇以及精神分析运动的境遇,并着重探讨了与费伦齐的关系;从当今的角度审视社会和政治环境以及弗洛伊德八个章节中所涉及的一些要点。他讨论了“可终止的”和“不可终止的”这两个术语的各种可能内涵。其他可使用的术语只是部分重合:有限与无限;能够被分析透彻与无法被分析透彻;可表达与不可表达;完成与未完成;可能与不可能。作者思考了在社会创伤情境下精神分析实践的新情况,这些情况引发了分析可能与否的问题。最后,尝试对可将分析视为可终止或不可终止的条件给出一个临时定义。