Anzieu D
Int J Psychoanal. 1987;68 ( Pt 1):9-19.
After summarizing the seven questions put by Freud in his 1937 paper 'Analysis terminable and interminable', the author reports on the case of a female patient in whose second analysis four difficulties arose: the condensation of several traumas; a preverbal main trauma; the need for a permanent auxiliary ego to perform certain psychical functions; and resistance to analysis of her sexual inhibitions. The concept of the 'skin-ego' is proposed as a guide to interpretation. Several factors in the negative therapeutic reaction are demonstrated: in neurotic patients, fulfillment of incestuous oedipal wishes with the analyst may be postponed until after the end of the analysis, thereby abolishing that end; while in borderline patients the need for an indestructible, immortal external object may make it impossible to bring the analysis to an end, the transference being both anaclitic and paradoxical. Three other cases are discussed more briefly and illustrate the alterations of the ego when confronted with destructive envy, boundless greed and the repetition compulsion. The concept of the 'all-embracing object', as distinct from the part-object and whole object, can explain some patients' need to change analysts.
在总结了弗洛伊德1937年论文《可终结的与不可终结的分析》中提出的七个问题后,作者报告了一位女性患者的案例,在其第二次分析中出现了四个难题:多种创伤的凝缩;言语前的主要创伤;需要一个永久性的辅助自我来执行某些心理功能;以及对分析其性抑制的抵抗。“皮肤自我”的概念被提出来作为解释的指导。文中展示了消极治疗反应中的几个因素:在神经症患者中,与分析师乱伦的俄狄浦斯愿望的实现可能会推迟到分析结束之后,从而使分析的结束化为泡影;而在边缘型患者中,对一个不可毁灭、不朽的外部客体的需求可能会使分析无法结束,这种移情既是依赖型的又是矛盾型的。另外三个案例被更简要地讨论,说明了自我在面对破坏性嫉妒、无节制的贪婪和强迫性重复时的变化。与部分客体和整体客体不同的“包容一切的客体”概念,可以解释一些患者更换分析师的需求。