• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗生素对肠道细菌的干扰并不会显著改变鸣禽物种对眼部疾病的宿主反应。

Antibiotic perturbation of gut bacteria does not significantly alter host responses to ocular disease in a songbird species.

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.

Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2022 Jun 10;10:e13559. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13559. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.13559
PMID:35707121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9190666/
Abstract

Bacterial communities in and on wild hosts are increasingly appreciated for their importance in host health. Through both direct and indirect interactions, bacteria lining vertebrate gut mucosa provide hosts protection against infectious pathogens, sometimes even in distal body regions through immune regulation. In house finches (), the bacterial pathogen (MG) causes conjunctivitis, with ocular inflammation mediated by pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and infection triggering MG-specific antibodies. Here, we tested the role of gut bacteria in host responses to MG by using oral antibiotics to perturb bacteria in the gut of captive house finches prior to experimental inoculation with MG. We found no clear support for an impact of gut bacterial disruption on conjunctival pathology, MG load, or plasma antibody levels. However, there was a non-significant trend for birds with intact gut communities to have greater conjunctival pathology, suggesting a possible impact of gut bacteria on pro-inflammatory cytokine stimulation. Using 16S bacterial rRNA amplicon sequencing, we found dramatic differences in cloacal bacterial community composition between captive, wild-caught house finches in our experiment and free-living finches from the same population, with lower bacterial richness and core communities composed of fewer genera in captive finches. We hypothesize that captivity may have affected the strength of results in this experiment, necessitating further study with this consideration. The abundance of anthropogenic impacts on wildlife and their bacterial communities, alongside the emergence and spread of infectious diseases, highlights the importance of studies addressing the role of commensal bacteria in health and disease, and the consequences of gut bacterial shifts on wild hosts.

摘要

野生宿主体内和体表的细菌群落,其在宿主健康方面的重要性正日益受到重视。通过直接和间接的相互作用,脊椎动物肠道黏膜上的细菌为宿主提供了抵御传染性病原体的保护,甚至有时通过免疫调节在远离身体的部位提供保护。在家雀()中,细菌病原体(MG)会引起结膜炎,眼部炎症是由促炎和抗炎细胞因子以及感染触发的 MG 特异性抗体介导的。在这里,我们通过在实验接种 MG 之前使用口服抗生素来扰乱圈养家雀肠道中的细菌,从而测试了肠道细菌在家雀对 MG 的反应中的作用。我们没有发现肠道细菌破坏对结膜病理、MG 载量或血浆抗体水平有明显影响的确切证据。然而,肠道群落完整的鸟类结膜病理更严重的趋势表明,肠道细菌可能对促炎细胞因子刺激有影响。使用 16S 细菌 rRNA 扩增子测序,我们发现实验中圈养和野生捕获的家雀以及来自同一群体的自由生活的雀之间的泄殖腔细菌群落组成存在显著差异,圈养雀的细菌丰富度较低,核心群落由较少的属组成。我们假设圈养可能影响了本实验的结果强度,因此需要进一步研究并考虑这一因素。野生动物及其细菌群落受到的人为影响以及传染病的出现和传播,突显了研究共生细菌在健康和疾病中的作用以及肠道细菌变化对野生宿主的影响的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7466/9190666/381bc00fa1a3/peerj-10-13559-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7466/9190666/225e10bb2568/peerj-10-13559-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7466/9190666/faa5037cf573/peerj-10-13559-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7466/9190666/381bc00fa1a3/peerj-10-13559-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7466/9190666/225e10bb2568/peerj-10-13559-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7466/9190666/faa5037cf573/peerj-10-13559-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7466/9190666/381bc00fa1a3/peerj-10-13559-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Antibiotic perturbation of gut bacteria does not significantly alter host responses to ocular disease in a songbird species.抗生素对肠道细菌的干扰并不会显著改变鸣禽物种对眼部疾病的宿主反应。
PeerJ. 2022 Jun 10;10:e13559. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13559. eCollection 2022.
2
Eye of the Finch: characterization of the ocular microbiome of house finches in relation to mycoplasmal conjunctivitis.雀之眼:家朱雀眼部微生物群与支原体性结膜炎的相关性特征分析
Environ Microbiol. 2017 Apr;19(4):1439-1449. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13625. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
3
Response of black-capped chickadees to house finch Mycoplasma gallisepticum.黑顶山雀对家朱雀鸡败血支原体的反应。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 16;10(4):e0124820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124820. eCollection 2015.
4
Differing House Finch Cytokine Expression Responses to Original and Evolved Isolates of .雀形目雀科不同细胞因子表达对原始和进化分离株的反应。
Front Immunol. 2018 Jan 22;9:13. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00013. eCollection 2018.
5
Characterization of unilateral conjunctival inoculation with Mycoplasma gallisepticum in house finches.鸡败血支原体单侧结膜接种在家雀中的特征描述
Avian Pathol. 2018 Oct;47(5):526-530. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2018.1495312. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
6
Natural Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in a captive flock of house finches.圈养的家朱雀群中自然感染鸡败血支原体
J Wildl Dis. 1998 Apr;34(2):289-96. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-34.2.289.
7
EFFECTS OF MYCOPLASMA GALLISEPTICUM INFECTION ON PREENING BEHAVIORS AND FEATHER QUALITY IN HOUSE FINCHES (HAEMORHOUS MEXICANUS).鸡毒支原体感染对家雀(墨西哥血雀)理羽行为和羽毛质量的影响。
J Wildl Dis. 2023 Apr 1;59(2):259-268. doi: 10.7589/JWD-D-22-00063.
8
Experimental test of microbiome protection across pathogen doses reveals importance of resident microbiome composition.跨病原体剂量的微生物组保护实验测试揭示了常驻微生物组组成的重要性。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2021 Oct 20;97(11). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiab141.
9
House Finch (Haemorhous mexicanus) Conjunctivitis, and Mycoplasma spp. Isolated from North American Wild Birds, 1994-2015.家朱雀(玫红朱雀)结膜炎以及1994年至2015年从北美野生鸟类中分离出的支原体属
J Wildl Dis. 2016 Jul;52(3):669-73. doi: 10.7589/2015-09-244. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
10
Comparative infectiousness of three passerine bird species after experimental inoculation with Mycoplasma gallisepticum.三种雀形目鸟类经鸡败血支原体实验接种后的相对传染性
Avian Pathol. 2008 Dec;37(6):635-40. doi: 10.1080/03079450802499100.

本文引用的文献

1
Gut microbiome composition, not alpha diversity, is associated with survival in a natural vertebrate population.肠道微生物群组成,而非α多样性,与一个自然脊椎动物种群的生存相关。
Anim Microbiome. 2021 Dec 20;3(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s42523-021-00149-6.
2
Experimental test of microbiome protection across pathogen doses reveals importance of resident microbiome composition.跨病原体剂量的微生物组保护实验测试揭示了常驻微生物组组成的重要性。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2021 Oct 20;97(11). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiab141.
3
Antibiotics and fecal transfaunation differentially affect microbiota recovery, associations, and antibiotic resistance in lemur guts.
抗生素和粪便菌群移植对狐猴肠道微生物群的恢复、关联及抗生素耐药性有不同影响。
Anim Microbiome. 2021 Oct 1;3(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s42523-021-00126-z.
4
Captivity reduces diversity and shifts composition of the Brown Kiwi microbiome.圈养会降低褐几维鸟微生物组的多样性并改变其组成。
Anim Microbiome. 2021 Jul 8;3(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s42523-021-00109-0.
5
Comparable response of wild rodent gut microbiome to anthropogenic habitat contamination.野生啮齿动物肠道微生物组对人为栖息地污染的可比响应。
Mol Ecol. 2021 Jul;30(14):3485-3499. doi: 10.1111/mec.15945. Epub 2021 May 27.
6
The fecal microbiota of wild and captive raptors.野生和圈养猛禽的粪便微生物群。
Anim Microbiome. 2020 May 6;2(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s42523-020-00035-7.
7
A time-lagged association between the gut microbiome, nestling weight and nestling survival in wild great tits.野生大山雀的肠道微生物组、雏鸟体重和雏鸟存活率之间存在时间滞后的关联。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Apr;90(4):989-1003. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13428. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
8
The study of host-microbiome (co)evolution across levels of selection.宿主-微生物组(共)进化的跨选择水平研究。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Sep 28;375(1808):20190604. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0604. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
9
Microbial transmission in animal social networks and the social microbiome.动物社交网络中的微生物传播与社交微生物组。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Aug;4(8):1020-1035. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1220-8. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
10
Microbiome and pathogen interaction with the immune system.微生物组与病原体和免疫系统的相互作用。
Poult Sci. 2020 Apr;99(4):1906-1913. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Mar 2.